1PeaceMaker
New member
All that matters is that Angel knows my definition. She does ... as does Arthur.
What a special dodge, dumping logic over alliances.
The *level* of abuse would coincide with how much a person loves their children and/or themselves.
Since my children were and will always be first, their well-being and mine trumped everything else.
You don't need to share what caused your breakup.
So basically, zero tolerance. No abuse. Leave at the first sign of abuse. Correct?
Simply put ... a spouse who is capable of physically violating their spouse, including death threats, should be considered a lethal threat.
A spouse who commits adultery has no qualms with putting his/her spouse at risk of illness and diseases, including death. Only an insecure woman would put up with that type of treatment. Only someone who despises women would expect them to put up with that type of behavior.
So your definition of abuse is putting the physically putting the spouse/children at risk of harm or actually harming them.
Is that all?
Pretty clear ... or do I need to draw you a picture?
Not totally clear. Are there any other kinds of abuse you would include?