So what?What does the next verse say?
Hebrews 4:11 NET Thus we must make every effort to enter that rest so that no one may fall by following the same pattern of disobedience.
So what?What does the next verse say?
Hebrews 4:11 NET Thus we must make every effort to enter that rest so that no one may fall by following the same pattern of disobedience.
So what?
good postYet He wept over Jerusalem. If they didn't come (and as a nation they never did) that can only prove, by your logic, that God never drew them...if He had drawn them, they'd inexorably have come. They didn't, so while they had heard, they must not have been drawn.
:think:
Yet Christ wept over their REFUSING to come to Him...which they could only do if they were drawn by the Father...meaning He was lamenting, by your logic, the Father's will in NOT drawing them.
I'm sure you don't see the problem there.
what's that?The rest is the millennial Sabbath.
What does the next verse say?
Hebrews 4:11 NET Thus we must make every effort to enter that rest so that no one may fall by following the same pattern of disobedience.
Yet He wept over Jerusalem. If they didn't come (and as a nation they never did)
that can only prove, by your logic, that God never drew them...if He had drawn them, they'd inexorably have come. They didn't, so while they had heard, they must not have been drawn.
Yet Christ wept over their REFUSING to come to Him
...which they could only do if they were drawn by the Father...meaning He was lamenting, by your logic, the Father's will in NOT drawing them.
I'm sure you don't see the problem there.
Right. God takes no pleasure in the (willful) death of the wicked.
You've got it!!!
If as you just figured out, God never drew them, then their refusal is based on something different than His offer of grace, right?
I see your logical problem, for sure . . .
The "refusal" to come to God was universal, due to original sin.
God chose an elect to be redeemed in and by Jesus Christ, that overrode and nullified the natural refusal of men to turn to God.
IOW's, God's drawing of sinners to faith in Jesus Christ, was never universally offered, but particularly designated only to those elect souls, known by God in Christ before the foundation of the world.
God does not accept the works or the obedience of sinners.
God is not willing that any should perish, 2 Peter 3:9. To teach that he is, is to teach that he is unjust.
If he is unjust then it is not possible to believe or trust in him.
Paul wrote, "For he that has enter into his rest, he has also ceased from his own works" Hebrews 4:10.
God is not willing that any redeemed in Christ should perish . . And they never will . . They are promised everlasting life!
Not so the wicked reprobate. They are not included in this promise of life and inheritance of God's glory.
The context of II Peter 3:9 pertains only to those who have been saved in Christ, and has nothing to do with those God has left in their sins. (Reprobates)
Yet He wept over Jerusalem. If they didn't come (and as a nation they never did) that can only prove, by your logic, that God never drew them...if He had drawn them, they'd inexorably have come. They didn't, so while they had heard, they must not have been drawn.
:think:
Yet Christ wept over their REFUSING to come to Him...which they could only do if they were drawn by the Father...meaning He was lamenting, by your logic, the Father's will in NOT drawing them.
I'm sure you don't see the problem there.
This is a very important doctrine, yet it is not mentioned in the "Canons of Dort" nor is it mentioned in the 33 "Canons of the Council of Trent". There is some mention of having faith in Christ. But there is no mention of being found "In Christ".
The "In Christ" doctrine was a big part of what Paul taught, "And be found "IN CHRIST", not having my own righteousness which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith" Philippians 3:9.
The reason that Calvinist, Catholics and others do not teach the "In Christ" doctrine is because they don't believe in it. In the Calvinist doctrine they are not saved by being "In Christ" they are saved by being predestinated. Even though there is no scripture about anyone being predestinated to heaven or to hell. Catholics apparently do not believe that they need to be "In Christ" simply because they don't teach it. If they don't teach it, its because they don't believe it.
For the Christian the "In Christ" doctrine is everything. It is his only hope. In the judgment if one is not found to be "In Christ" he will perish. God only accepts the righteousness of Christ. This is why Paul said, "Not having my own righteousness, which is of the law". If you enter in to the judgment with your own righteousness, which is of the law, you will perish.
What does it mean to be "In Christ?"
It means that you have ceased from your own works (religion) and you are resting in the works and the person of Jesus Christ for your salvation. Paul wrote, "For he that has enter into his rest, he has also ceased from his own works" Hebrews 4:10. It means that you have stopped trying to be good enough and have come to the realization that Christ was good enough for you. If anyone will be saved in the judgment it will be because of the merits of Jesus Christ.
The elect were in Christ before the foundation of the world Ephesians 1:4. They were in union with Christ that early.
Why Calvinist, Catholics, Others, Never Talk About Being "In Christ"
...because they are not deceived in the same way as others in false denominations.
To be "In Christ" means that you are trusting in HIS righteousness and in HIS atonement for your sins. This is how Jesus justifies the ungodly, Romans 4:5.
Jesus puts those in him whom he chooses. That happens when Jesus saves someone. Jesus puts himself in that person and puts that person in him.
Jesus tells us whom he chooses. He chooses those who believe and obey by repenting of their sins.
What you are talking about is sanctification.
The Christian life that is lived before God as a sinner. You may fool some, but you can't fool God.
Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men
Pate is right about thatRobert Pate says they do. He says they only have to believe first.