Attorney client privilege disallows me to go into specifics, as well as privacy laws and doctor patient privilege.
Who Posted?
- Thread starter chrysostom
- Start date
Attorney client privilege disallows me to go into specifics, as well as privacy laws and doctor patient privilege.
He did. We differed on it. My response was to a post defaming the dead in that Colorado theater shooting, some of whom were members of the armed forces. The poster in question called them cowards. I responded that the poster was an odious object floating in the punch bowl of life. The post defaming the dead received no infraction or warning.
My objection was two fold. First, that the response wasn't needless or, in the context of the sponsoring post, disruptive. You can't disrupt someone insulting others by insulting what they've done. The point of that joke being to parallel the conduct that takes what should be a public good and makes it unpalatable and foul. That's what the poster did.
My second objection involved not being given some indication, like a warning, that would indicate a desire for me to leave the angry defamer be. I've seen far worse given far less attention. The post that defamed the dead, by way of.
I said that to Spectrox because I didn't want him to think I was abandoning the thread and my answer when I knew I wouldn't be around. I initially thought to withdraw until the infraction point was no longer in play, but subsequently decided that doing that would amount to punishing myself for something I didn't believe merited notice to begin with and so I altered my course accordingly.
You, on the other hand, cried like a girl who'd had her pony stolen, made a special thread and stomped off, sulking.
That's why I found your accusations particularly amusing. You have this way of projecting that I hadn't paid sufficient attention to before, when I was for reasons that escape me now, taking you seriously. :e4e:
You don't have to go into specifics. I already said I'm sure people violate the cannon of ethics, as do people in any number of situations.
But there's nothing in the practice of law that is inherently immoral or unethical, only men who fail to act morally or ethically. And that problem is in the man, not the law or its practice.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
In other words, I shouldn't let it bother me when you bait and taunt, mock and name-call?
My friends know about my sense of humor. That you don't know me well enough to know that about me is okay - and in fact, I'd like to keep it that way.
Ummm....no. If I have something to say I'll say it and say it civilly - thanks for trying to shut me down, but no.
Otherwise you'll post this video ad nauseam? Let the video clucking - I mean counting - begin.
I doubt that's true. You don't credit her much. That's another mistake then.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
It's advice anna, learned from over ten years here.
take it or leave it
stay and enjoy the place or rage against those who irritate you or take a break now and then
do whatever you want
like I said earlier, I'm not trying to convince anybody here :idunno:
take it or leave it
stay and enjoy the place or rage against those who irritate you or take a break now and then
do whatever you want
like I said earlier, I'm not trying to convince anybody here :idunno:
Wearing how many masks?
And be assured that when you do, if he doesn't like you, he's going to mischaracterize you doing it.
Generous of you.
lain:Oh, don't sell yourself short. I think you're doing a smashing job of convincing people, if slowly. Anna being the latest.
anna - do you remember October 2011 when Town and I were butting heads and the whole board was in an uproar and I backed him into a corner and pounded him into silt and he slunk off butthurt for a month or so with a teary-eyed drama queen farewell?
fool said something pithy during that period when the whole board was in an uproar.
(that fool - he's nobody's fool )
He said, in response to somebody whining about me and Town butting heads, something to the effect of "meh - they must be having fun or they'd stop"
As long as you're having fun anna, don't stop
fool said something pithy during that period when the whole board was in an uproar.
(that fool - he's nobody's fool
)He said, in response to somebody whining about me and Town butting heads, something to the effect of "meh - they must be having fun or they'd stop"
As long as you're having fun anna, don't stop
and if you want to let it bother you when I bait and taunt, mock and name-call, why you go right ahead, bless your little heart
Are you that far into your own narrative that you think that's what actually happened?
Interesting. I don't think you are. I think this is just you trying everything. But it won't work.
I remember you misusing the Holy, stalking me to the point of infraction. I recall chrys running along like a shadow. But I also recall and left a pretty clear answer to your overall nonsense here. I'll come back and link to it at some point.
You're troubled.
He was wrong. I like spirited debate. I don't mind rough and tumble. What you do is something else. Not to everyone, only to those who call you on the smell of it.
It never bothers me when you bait and taunt. But you really should get a new dress.and if you want to let it bother you when I bait and taunt, mock and name-call, why you go right ahead, bless your little heart
My son and I were discussing it this afternoon and he thought Leonidas' face chopped on Barney would be cool.
Remember my old Barney avatar?
No. Did you do Barney?
:freak:
Oh shoot - you joined right after I left April 1st
I think this was it
Oh shoot - you joined right after I left April 1st
I think this was it
:freak:
Oh shoot - you joined right after I left April 1st
I think this was it
Both avatars totally rock
I see zoo's lurking on the board
Will he post today?
Tune in later and find out
Will he post today?
Tune in later and find out
thanks for not going all creepy stalker control-issue obsessive and locking it on us