Whiny Atheists

[WizardofOz]

Subscribers rarely get banned. The higher up the metal scale (bronze, silver, gold) the less likely that is to occur . . . Lifetime members NEVER get banned that I've heard about.

:chuckle: Silent Hunter is even guilty of being an off-topic whiny athest

 

[Silent Hunter]

It wasnt disagreement with me, but disagreement that what is being discussed us actually happening at all - huge difference.

Disagreement with the majority doesn't make one . . . wrong . . . except on TOL.

 

[Silent Hunter]

The cross is being included on a secular basis.

That's the pretext at least . . . .

That is why the suit has been dismissed in the past and likely will be again.

That the cross (and you admit that it is) has ANY religious significance is offensive when I'm paying for its upkeep with MY taxes.

Any ol' beam pulled out from the wreckage and propped up by the relief workers. Kind of too late to revise history though, isn't it?

I understand they still have quite a bit of the scrap from the WTC that hasn't been disposed of yet.

 

[Angel4Truth]

Disagreement with the majority doesn't make one . . . wrong . . . except on TOL.

The majority disagree that humanists are actually trying to stop roadside memorials that use crosses for them? Since when?

 

[resurrected]

Subscribers rarely get banned.

i wear my bannings like a badge of honor

 

[Angel4Truth]

:rotfl:

 

[Eeset]

Banned permanently, probably not. However, they DO get banned.

I was banned after becoming a lifetime member. Several times. I also know that I came very close to getting banned permanently. Membership at any level is not going to prevent Knight or other Mods from banning someone who violates rules and degrades the TOL site.

 

[Rusha]

I was banned after becoming a lifetime member. Several times. I also know that I came very close to getting banned permanently. Membership at any level is not going to prevent Knight or other Mods from banning someone who violates rules and degrades the TOL site.

Exactly.

 

[WizardofOz]

That the cross (and you admit that it is) has ANY religious significance is offensive when I'm paying for its upkeep with MY taxes.

You do realize you're paying for a lot of crosses with your taxpayer money, right?

I understand they still have quite a bit of the scrap from the WTC that hasn't been disposed of yet.

Yeah, why feature scrap that has historical significance and relevance when all this other junk scrap is available? lain:

Maybe the American Atheists can yet fashion a flying spaghetti monster monument out of some. :idunno:

 

[Silent Hunter]

The majority disagree that humanists are actually trying to stop roadside memorials that use crosses for them? Since when?

:doh:

 

[Silent Hunter]

You do realize you're paying for a lot of crosses with your taxpayer money, right?

Yip . . . and I disagree with that one too . . . but . . . not the ones used to mark the graves.

Yeah, why feature scrap that has historical significance and relevance when all this other junk scrap [that has historical significance] is available?

Exactly . . .

Maybe the American Atheists can yet fashion a flying spaghetti monster monument out of some.

Are you trying to remove all doubt that you're an idiot?

 

[Angel4Truth]

:doh:

1) res called purex a retard for claiming multiple times that no atheists/humanists were demanding roadside crosses removed after being shown otherwise over and over
2) you questioned res saying namecalling without reason
3) he had a reason, and it was the repeated false assertion that what is said in many news articles is false.
4) you then said disagreement is a reason?, and it was more than that - not simple disagreement with a person but that the article was false and I said the disagreement wasnt with me, but with the false assertion that what the article said isnt actually happening by purex
5)you then said the majority disagree which lead to that.

 

[Silent Hunter]

1) res called purex a retard for claiming multiple times that no atheists/humanists were demanding roadside crosses removed after being shown otherwise over and over
2) you questioned res saying namecalling without reason
3) he had a reason, and it was the repeated false assertion that what is said in many news articles is false.
4) you then said disagreement is a reason?, and it was more than that - not simple disagreement with a person but that the article was false and I said the disagreement wasnt with me, but with the false assertion that what the article said isnt actually happening by purex
5)you then said the majority disagree which lead to that.

:sigh:

You need a new hobby . . .

 

[Angel4Truth]

:sigh:

I have one, and hope you will too one day so i can still mess with you in heaven

 

[Silent Hunter]

I have one, and hope you will too one day so i can still mess with you in heaven

 

[resurrected]

1) res called purex a retard for claiming multiple times that no atheists/humanists were demanding roadside crosses removed after being shown otherwise over and over
2) you questioned res saying namecalling without reason
3) he had a reason, and it was the repeated false assertion that what is said in many news articles is false.
4) you then said disagreement is a reason?, and it was more than that - not simple disagreement with a person but that the article was false and I said the disagreement wasnt with me, but with the false assertion that what the article said isnt actually happening by purex
5)you then said the majority disagree which lead to that.

it worries me that you're able to keep track of what's going on here :noid:

 

[Silent Hunter]

it worries me that you're able to keep track of what's going on here

It isn't so much keeping up as it is gearing up for one of her patented strawmen and/or one of her usual ad hominems.

 

[Angel4Truth]

it worries me that you're able to keep track of what's going on here :noid:

 

[Angel4Truth]

It isn't so much keeping up as it is gearing up for one of her patented strawmen and/or one of her usual ad hominems.

No, sadly you make a poor medium.

 

[WizardofOz]

Maybe the American Atheists can yet fashion a flying spaghetti monster monument out of some.

Are you trying to remove all doubt that you're an idiot?

:sigh:
What is idiotic about that?

Perhaps you're not up on current events. :idunno: