It is silly to think that God should not put humans to a test if He knows in advance they will fail.If God knew Adam would sin. Why did God tell Adam not to eat the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?
It is silly to think that God should not put humans to a test if He knows in advance they will fail.If God knew Adam would sin. Why did God tell Adam not to eat the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil?
Will a loving God condemn a sinner to hell in wrath? Of course. The Bible is full of support for that fact, even if some sinners struggle with how that could be true.That this can be believed at the same time by the same person who believes GOD is love is amazing to me.
The consequences of sin is death, ie, all death is for personal sin, not Adam's sin:
Jeremiah 31:30
Instead, everyone will die for their own sin
Of course we did. All men (those who reach the age of accountability, that is) choose to sin, rather than loving God.
Those who do not reach the age of accountability are not condemned, for there is no wickedness in them.
We are stuck with the consequences of Adam's sin, yes.
But we are not punished for Adam's sin, because Christ went to the cross.
That this can be believed at the same time by the same person who believes GOD is love is amazing to me.
The consequences of sin is death, ie, all death is for personal sin, not Adam's sin:
Jeremiah 31:30
Instead, everyone will die for their own sin
So you think that we do not live in a fallen world? That is a consequence of Adam's fall.
Spirits cannot die like a body can. By becoming a soul in a body, Adam brought death to all sinners, not sin: the serpent had already fallen when ALL was pronounced good and he sinned before Adam ate by tempting Eve, then Eve sinned by believing the serpent and tempting Adam who, on earth, sinned third. For Adam to have brought death (proof of sin) into the world, he had to have sinned before he came into the world as the first sinner to be sent here. The eisegesic interpretation of these verses to make Adam who was the third to sin to be counted as the first to support the theory we are created on earth is egregious.I said that that we are stuck with the CONSEQUENCES of Adam's sin.
He had a son already in eternity.The Lord cannot be called creator if he did not have creeated beings or writting. A father can't be called father without his children.
Jesus was God before He came to earth and took upon Himself the form of a man.He had a son already in eternity.
John 17:5 - Prayer for the Son
And now, Father, glorify Me in Your presence with the glory I had with You before the world existed.biblehub.com
I was pointing out to @grumix8 that God didn’t need to create to be a father.Jesus was God before He came to earth and took upon Himself the form of a man.
A tip for you. If you want to engage with someone’s post, hit the “post reply” button and make sure it includes the post you’re replying to, or we can’t always tell who you’re talking to.but with no one around who will aknowledge him he created beings aroundhim such as angels to serve him and to help him. Being self creation cannot be proven without witnesses and he tell us in scripture we are his witnesses of his glory. G-d is one being perfect but for A father to be called A father he needeth A son Jesus is that son before the devil, Michael, and Gabriel was Jesus and he himself bestowed his will by creating other beings special relationship he has with the universe thus G-d created other beings to be A creator of himself in that way is creator but for special purpose to be called A father you need A son.
Occasional paragraph breaks also help a lot.Periods are also helpful.
As a Trinitarian I cannot accept this. GOD is love and love without an object to love is meaningless, self love and narcissistic.. To be eternally loving there had to be an eternal object of love, at least one... Father has nothing to do with creation of the Son but with the attitude, pov and impetus of perfect Fatherhood and perfect Sonship.Your wrong derf, G-d loves ya. He created everything but to be called A father he's first being is not Lucifer it was Jesus.
The Bible doesn't refer to God's role as Creator as a Father role.Father is A title and it is the word given to us that represent his relation as Creator perhaps he has other names he uses. But father is one and I don't trustscot ;D.
So we should rely on whet ‘we know’ about God rather than what God revealed to us about Himself?What please we know he is the father and as father the one who created the universe the title of God-head is only his.
He "is the Father" in regards to some things in particular. He's not just some vague "father".What please we know he is the father and as father the one who created the universe the title of God-head is only his.