Thanks. Evidently, I'm scoring points.
I fail to see why you are making a joke of idolatry in light of the fact that idolatry is an offense which incurs the death penalty in the Old Testament.
What makes Bob Enyart “the man” of this site?
- Thread starter Sierrasam
- Start date
Thanks. Evidently, I'm scoring points.
I fail to see why you are making a joke of idolatry in light of the fact that idolatry is an offense which incurs the death penalty in the Old Testament.
Was that really worth the time it took you to register? :idunno:
C
cattyfan
Guest
It's not a sin to make fun of idolatry, and there is no penalty.
There is a penalty, however, for not having a sense of humor.
Yes, my humor is alive and well. I was laughing hysterically when I learned that Bob Enyart actually wants to make the Mosaic law the law of the land.
That isn't what Bob wants. So... are you laughing now?
To make light of idolatry is no laughing matter.
:mock: Palladius
C
cattyfan
Guest
You find no absurdity in the thought of worshipping someone or something other than the One True God? The idea is so ludicrous, it's funny...hence, the amusement of making fun of idolatry.
C
cattyfan
Guest
Wikipedia can be written and edited by anybody. I wouldn't use that as my single and sole source on anything.
Knight, Cattyfan - are you telling me that these AREN'T legitimately his thoughts/words vis-a-vis this country's future?
http://shadowgov.com/Constitution/ConstitutionOfAmerica.html
Because this is pretty scary stuff, and it's on a site with his copyright on it.
http://shadowgov.com/Constitution/ConstitutionOfAmerica.html
Because this is pretty scary stuff, and it's on a site with his copyright on it.
Palladius, while there is some overlap, God's criminal justice system is not the same as the mosaic law. Bob does not advocate enforcing the mosaic law. After all.... Bob is a Christian why would he advocate enforcing something Jesus nailed to the cross?
wikipedia is not always a reliable source.
wikipedia is not always a reliable source.
Last edited:
It would appear that Yahweh did not consider it such a laughing matter.
"Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:
thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God" Exodus 20:3-5
Mr. Enyart does not advocate the death penalty for homosexuals?
Agreed. Wikipedia can be biased. Here's a classic example.
PyramidHead
Active member
C
cattyfan
Guest
No...I'm not commenting on his beliefs, because I'm not a follower and don't have enough knowledge one way or another. I've already stated I'm not a fan.
What I'm saying is Wikipedia is not a source I would look to when trying to find the most accurate information. You would do better to read Enyart's own writings or listetn to his program (which can be done via podcast) and draw conclusions from his own words, rather than someone else's interpretations.
C
cattyfan
Guest
Yes. And if I were actually bowing down to someone else, there would be cause for concern. This is why I said
See, if you actually read the words, I said I find the idea of worshipping anyone else to be a ridiculous idea. I would, therefore, never worship anyone else.
Am I going to fast for you? Let me slow it down.
I
am
not
really
worshipping
someone
else.
It
was
a
joke.
God didn't say Thou shalt not make jokes.
That's what I meant. It's my understanding, looking at that site, that it's his own writings/thoughts/words. And I find those thoughts and words frightening, particularly given that there appear to be a number of people here who seem to give him credibility.
Definitely not! Not when the ultimate source is available and public.