Right Divider
Body part
According to the HPT, the fountains were extremely hot when the events began (i.e, supercritical water at extremely high pressure).Also, the fountains were cold, not hot.
According to the HPT, the fountains were extremely hot when the events began (i.e, supercritical water at extremely high pressure).Also, the fountains were cold, not hot.
Yep, just like the Space X Falcon 9 blasted through the atmosphere, thanks to the continued addition of energy.
Yep, just like the Space X Falcon 9 blasted through the atmosphere, thanks to the continued addition of energy.
According to the HPT, the fountains were extremely hot when the events began (i.e, supercritical water at extremely high pressure).
Right. But the fountains themselves were cold.
I'm not sure what you definition of "fountains" is. My understanding is that the fountains are the waters that burst forth from under the earth that were heated to supercritical levels.
I'm not sure what you definition of "fountains" is. My understanding is that the fountains are the waters that burst forth from under the earth that were heated to supercritical levels.
You're still not getting it.
A rocket doesn't put out a pebble's worth of energy compared to the Fountains of the Great Deep.
You miss my point, a rocket gets to space by continued and additional energy to get to escape velocity. Where does a rock that later hit the moon get its energy?
You miss my point, a rocket gets to space by continued and additional energy to get to escape velocity. Where does a rock that later hit the moon get its energy?
You are still missing my point. How fast is a 100 pound rock going when it leaves the earth's surface per Brown?
More or less the same speed as all the other material that was launched.
And how fast is that? Does Dr. Brown give a number?
Cool1. that number came from a note to myself based on Brown's book. I'll see if I can find a specific reference.
It's relevant. The point is that he isn't stupid and isn't just making this stuff up off the top of his head. He knows what he's talking about and not only know how to do his homework on the subject but has done so.2. the fact he has a PhD is not really relevant. I have a daughter with a PhD
I understand the objection and I don't deny that it potentially a valid one but can you substantiate the objection with something more than the fact that you personally just don't buy it?3. still have an issue with the energy used to launch comets, asteroids etc. Once the material leaves the mid ocean ridge it needs additional input unless it is going at escape velocity to begin with. and, as it rises there is nothing to keep it from spreading thereby losing energy and making it more difficult for any inputs from below to be effective.
It's relevant. The point is that he isn't stupid and isn't just making this stuff up off the top of his head. He knows what he's talking about and not only know how to do his homework on the subject but has done so.
I understand the objection and I don't deny that it potentially a valid one but can you substantiate the objection with something more than the fact that you personally just don't buy it?
Also, it should be pointed out that the falsification of this single point would not do much at all to the rest of his theory. It's the geological aspects of his theory that I find most compelling.
The chambers under the crust were filled with supercritical fluids. When the crust cracked open, the resulting jets of water would have been cold due to the expanse of the fluid.
Fluids cool rapidly as they expand (as in from below the crust to the surface) as well described by the Joule-Thomson effect.
https://kgov.com/hydroplate-theory-h...lem-walt-brown
In fact, the fountains were so cold that the only thing preventing them from freezing apart from it's motion was that it was full of minerals wich lowered its freezing point to well below 32 degrees F.
You are still missing my point. How fast is a 100 pound rock going when it leaves the earth's surface per Brown?
How do get that he "refuses to accept Genesis 1:2"?Judge, It's nice to see you also believe the water inside Earth was supercritical at The Flood. But Walt's Hydroplate theory is wrong as he refuses to accept both Gensiss 1:2 and Enoch 3:3.
Your understanding of super critical water seems to be nonexistent.But concerning the water - do you know how it got so hot and is getting so hot again as to cause global warming?
Also, your understanding of expansion of hot water is a litte confused and you've obviously never worked with steam?
And how does this disagree with the HPT?FYI the geysers of The Flood continued quite a while and were so vast that they just kept on soaring up and out of Earth's atmosphere - and carried lots of debris out into space to make the asteroids and comets that are just big fluffy ice balls.
It was such iceballs that made the wide shallow craters on the moon and especially the peaked craters.
Some proof would be nice.The other planets all show GOD made them the same as Earth - as balls of water and basic elements.
What "same process"?The same process occurs around the spouts of taps in my bathroom due to precipitation of minerals which I have to remove periodically.
How do get that he "refuses to accept Genesis 1:2"?
Enoch is not scripture, so who cares?
Your understanding of super critical water seems to be nonexistance.
And how does this disagree with the HPT?
Some proof would be nice.
What "same process"?
What does any of this have to do with the topic?