It's not.
Keypurr's comin' round.
And it aint just because a that AENT he's readin'.
Good to see yuh, friend.
It's not.
Keypurr's comin' round.
And it aint just because a that AENT he's readin'.
Good to see yuh, friend.
The first man is 'earthly', the second 'spiritual', of the Lord from heaven, the immortal man. Paul understood these mysteries, we digress
Not to be concerned about being off topic. Let the spirit flow.
I feel that I among friends right now.
The first anthropos Adam became a nephesh-chayah living soul and was formed of dust from the adamah, that is, soil-like, dusty, choikos-earthy-dusty; and this is clearly the first anthropos-man formed of Elohim in Genesis 2:7. The second anthropos is from the heavens, (Genesis 1:26-27). For a man can receive nothing unless it be given him from the heavens.
Indeed, 'Man' is the apex of God's creation, the mirror of His own Self. Hence the 'Adam-Kadmon' concept holds. Man is the individual expression of the Universal Father, and such 'image' and 'likeness' is intrinsic to his creation, in both substance and form, - of which Jesus is the perfect representation, in whose image we are also 'conformed' as we are perfected in Spirit.
The first man is 'earthly', the second 'spiritual', of the Lord from heaven, the immortal man. Paul understood these mysteries, even to showing that the resurrection is really 'spiritual',...but that's another subject, lest we digress
The AENT is putting a rubber stamp on my thoughts. But I am still learning about the real me. Why have I put limits on myself when I can fly?
Icarus comes to mind.
Don't wanna fly to high to fast.
Peace Key.
Icarus comes to mind.
Don't wanna flytotoo hightotoo fast.
Peace Key.
to describe something is in excess, like too much; it's 2 o's
like too many times - not: to many times
:thumb: Hey Keypurr!
I noticed you said "of the Lord from heaven" in that previous post but did not want to go into it at the time. However, now that the Spirit is free to flow with the blessing of the OP I would suggest the following:
The Textus Receptus indeed says that the second man is "the Lord from heaven", (at least that is how the AV-KJV renders it without the "of" which you had rendered and is forever debateable anyways as you probably know) but the Majority GNT-Morph Texts do not contain "the Lord" in that same statement:
1 Corinthians 15:45-47 KJV
45. And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; [Gen 2:7] the last Adam was made a quickening spirit [Messiah Yeshua].
46. Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.
47. The first man is of the earth, earthy: [Gen 2:7] the second man is the Lord from heaven [?].
1 Corinthians 15:45-47 ASV
45. So also it is written, The first man Adam became a living soul [Gen 2:7]. The last Adam became a life-giving spirit [Messiah Yeshua].
46. Howbeit that is not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; then that which is spiritual.
47. The first man is of the earth, earthy: [Gen 2:7] the second man is of heaven [Gen 1:26-27].
I would strongly suggest that Paul does not use "the Lord" which is found in the TR version of 1 Cor 15:47 for several reasons. First reason is that the Torah and all the Prophets prophesied until Yochanan, (Matthew 11:13) and this includes Genesis and the creation account. Second reason is that the first man Adam which Paul speaks of was clearly formed in Genesis 2:7, (choikos, earthy, dust-like). However, when we read that account, we see that the first anthropon Adam was formed of dust from the adamah BEFORE there was any plant of the field in the earth, and BEFORE any herb of the field had sprouted or grown. This means the first Adam was taken from the dust of the adamah in qedem - olam past, that is, before time because it is before the fourth day creation of the greater light, the lesser light, and the stars, (which were created for signs, seasons, times, appointed times, days, and years, according to the Word spoken therein). The second man is therefore the one given dominion over the fish of the sea, fowls of the heavens, and all the beasts of the earth, and everything that moves upon the earth. That one is from the heavens, and is cut down in the image of Elohim in Genesis 1:26-27. It is not that the second man is not the Master from the heavens but that if that statement is included in 1 Cor 15:47 then most will not likely ever even begin to think that Paul speaks of the creation account in that statement. In other words to truly understand what is being said one must understand that Golgotha is the Sixth Day prophesied in Genesis 1, (hehe). Therefore likewise Yeshua says, "My Father works UNTIL NOW, and I work", (when he was accused of breaking their version of Shabbat, John 5:16-17).
to describe something is in excess, like too much; it's 2 o's
like too many times - not: to many times
so it's too high, too fast, too furious
stop smearin' MAD Ian !!
But I floo 2OO high.:shocked:
Yes, I been seein' that too. :cheers:
How about this for a resurrection? The soul stays trapped in whatever it did not overcome while still in the body (the garment spotted by the flesh), but the spirit returns to the One that sent it. The resurrection is the RE-union of the soul and spirit, which can happen while still in the body. It's the superior of the resurrections Paul spoke of.
So failing to understand this, what has Christendom wrought, but a bunch of people who want to die and "go to heaven", not realizing that they will not get past the gates of the city. Paul could not have made it any plainer by stating that he did not want to be UNCLOTHED, but clothed upon, mortality swallowed up of immortality, yet they create their own doctrine.
Hoping amiss, means your hope has no chance of materializing. Christ IN US, is the only hope of glory, ie. a glorified body. There is nothing in death in and of itself to bring glory.
I understand. I guess I didn't see it as throwing off the topic, since it's actually describing the finished product of the Seed becoming much fruit. Peace
stop smearin' MAD Ian !!
Ya'll are just two funny! :crackup: :crackup:
I guess it is on-topic after all, eh friend? So Adam died, as he was warned, but YHWH had a plan all along and clothed him from on High, (second man from the heavens typology).
{ speaking to freelight:}
I noticed you said "of the Lord from heaven" in that previous post but did not want to go into it at the time. However, now that the Spirit is free to flow with the blessing of the OP I would suggest the following:
The Textus Receptus indeed says that the second man is "the Lord from heaven", (at least that is how the AV-KJV renders it without the "of" which you had rendered and is forever debateable anyways as you probably know) but the Majority GNT-Morph Texts do not contain "the Lord" in that same statement:
1 Corinthians 15:45-47 KJV
45. And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; [Gen 2:7] the last Adam was made a quickening spirit [Messiah Yeshua].
46. Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.
47. The first man is of the earth, earthy: [Gen 2:7] the second man is the Lord from heaven [?].
1 Corinthians 15:45-47 ASV
45. So also it is written, The first man Adam became a living soul [Gen 2:7]. The last Adam became a life-giving spirit [Messiah Yeshua].
46. Howbeit that is not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; then that which is spiritual.
47. The first man is of the earth, earthy: [Gen 2:7] the second man is of heaven [Gen 1:26-27].
I would strongly suggest that Paul does not use "the Lord" which is found in the TR version of 1 Cor 15:47 for several reasons. First reason is that the Torah and all the Prophets prophesied until Yochanan, (Matthew 11:13) and this includes Genesis and the creation account. Second reason is that the first man Adam which Paul speaks of was clearly formed in Genesis 2:7, (choikos, earthy, dust-like). However, when we read that account, we see that the first anthropon Adam was formed of dust from the adamah BEFORE there was any plant of the field in the earth, and BEFORE any herb of the field had sprouted or grown. This means the first Adam was taken from the dust of the adamah in qedem - olam past, that is, before time because it is before the fourth day creation of the greater light, the lesser light, and the stars, (which were created for signs, seasons, times, appointed times, days, and years, according to the Word spoken therein). The second man is therefore the one given dominion over the fish of the sea, fowls of the heavens, and all the beasts of the earth, and everything that moves upon the earth. That one is from the heavens, and is cut down in the image of Elohim in Genesis 1:26-27. It is not that the second man is not the Master from the heavens but that if that statement is included in 1 Cor 15:47 then most will not likely ever even begin to think that Paul speaks of the creation account in that statement. In other words to truly understand what is being said one must understand that Golgotha is the Sixth Day prophesied in Genesis 1, (hehe). Therefore likewise Yeshua says, "My Father works UNTIL NOW, and I work", (when he was accused of breaking their version of Shabbat, John 5:16-17).
42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown a perishable body, it is raised an imperishable body; 43 it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; 44 it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body. 45 So also it is written, “The first man, Adam, became a living soul.” The last Adam became a life-giving spirit. 46 However, the spiritual is not first, but the natural; then the spiritual. 47 The first man is from the earth, earthy; the second man is from heaven. 48 As is the earthy, so also are those who are earthy; and as is the heavenly, so also are those who are heavenly. 49 Just as we have borne the image of the earthy, we will also bear the image of the heavenly.
-NASB
Just to meditate upon the image of the heavenly, (Christ in us, the hope of glory) is a wondrous thing As the image of divinity is further unfolded in us, the greater glory to God.
Romans 5:14 KJV
14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come .
I concur that the TR's rendition of the second man being "the Lord from heaven" may not be the most accurate translation here, since we see that Paul's description of the 'heavenly man' is not necessarily about Jesus only (who no doubt serves as the prototype of the resurrected man) but is the universal archetype of resurrected man (all mankind who qualify and undergo this transformation).
We see this better in the full context of this passage which further affirms that we will bear the "image" of the heavenly man (essentially 'God' himself, of whom the Lord Jesus is the express image, and we ourselves AS we put on the heavenly form).
Just to meditate upon the image of the heavenly, (Christ in us, the hope of glory) is a wondrous thing As the image of divinity is further unfolded in us, the greater glory to God.
42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown a perishable body, it is raised an imperishable body; 43 it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; 44 it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body. 45 So also it is written, “The first man, Adam, became a living soul.” The last Adam became a life-giving spirit. 46 However, the spiritual is not first, but the natural; then the spiritual. 47 The first man is from the earth, earthy; the second man is from heaven. 48 As is the earthy, so also are those who are earthy; and as is the heavenly, so also are those who are heavenly. 49 Just as we have borne the image of the earthy, we will also bear the image of the heavenly.
-NASB
The AENT is putting a rubber stamp on my thoughts. But I am still learning about the real me. Why have I put limits on myself when I can fly?