We were created in their image, male and female created He them. Spiritually speaking, we do create. The female aspect, also called our soul, like a womb, reproduces whatever seed is planted in it.
This is why hate is as of the sin of murder. Peace
What is the express image of God?
- Thread starter keypurr
- Start date
We were created in their image, male and female created He them. Spiritually speaking, we do create. The female aspect, also called our soul, like a womb, reproduces whatever seed is planted in it.
This is why hate is as of the sin of murder. Peace
Then once again, I'm in doubt here. Surely I do not understand your post. You don't think Yeshua used His power??? What on earth do you mean? Peace
keypurr
Well-known member
That is what I stated friend.
You did not state that the Word became flesh. This is what you said;
You disagree with the fact that Jesus is the Word.
freelight
Eclectic Theosophist
Hi BR,
Did you read my last post to you? Also,...if we go by the greek philosophical concept of 'logos' as an impersonal principle, plan, design, word, thought-concept, wisdom, logic, reason, etc....this 'logos' doesn't necessarily need to be a 'person', although it CAN be 'personified' in various theologies. In this case,...the logos becoming 'flesh' just means the 'mind-design' or 'plan' of God is being manifested/fleshed out/expressed in the person of Jesus and his goodnews message about the kingdom. There are other more liberal interpretations of John's gospel narrative
keypurr
Well-known member
Yes I did, read the last line.
Jesus is not the word, the spirit in him is the Word.
That spirit became flesh in the body that was prepared for him, Jesus. Heb 10:5
You don't believe John 1:14.
keypurr
Well-known member
Yes I do. But it is not about Jesus, it is about Christ, the spirit son of God. Christ spoke and acted through Jesus.
Reference: NKJV Study Bible John 1:14
The Son of God who was from eternity became human with limitations in time and space. This is the doctrine of the Incarnation: God became human. Nothing of the essential nature of the deity was lost in this event.
keypurr
Well-known member
Your notes re just another mans opinion friend.
The son in question is Christ not Jesus.
But he is not God, his Father is. I do not like your new Bible friend.
keypurr
Well-known member
Your notes are just another mans opinion friend.
The son in question is Christ not Jesus.
But he is not God, his Father is. I do not like your new Bible friend.
Just like, your "theories and false doctrine" are just another man's opinion. Know what I mean?
KP, your pure nonsense isn't getting you anywhere, is it? You'd have
a better chance posting that the world is gonna end in the next thirty
days. Then, when it doesn't happen, start the process over again.
Jesus is the Christ. He is not two different entities as you believe. I am saddened for you friend. You are lost and without hope. God is still able to change your thinking if you are willing. He's a good God. Give Him a chance.
Gros,
Have you ever been filled with the Spirit which was first in Jesus Christ?
LA
Your view is RCC spiritualism.
Gods word became flesh, not God became a little baby in Mary.
The word "Jesus Christ is come in the flesh" shows Jesus is a man.
Your view denies it, for a God in human flesh is not a man.
However Jesus Christ is also come in the flesh of His children who have /are filled with the Holy Spirit,
which is the core reason for the RCC false doctrine.
LA
keypurr
Well-known member
At one time they were two BR.
Christ came down from heaven to live in Jesus at his baptism. You do not wish to see that. I can not change what is written friend. My God is a great God, he's loved us enough to send his son to us. The express image is that son BR, not Jesus.
You poor soul. Your life-source is your own false doctrine and false theories.
What are you using? Because, you certainly don't understand the Scriptures?