That being the case, it was Trump who resurrected this "alleged" relationship from a decade ago by directing his lawyer to offer $130000 for Ms Daniels to sign a nondisclosure agreement just 10 days before the 2016 Presidential Election?Pretty much all of what's been alleged happened back when he was a Democrat, so it doesn't count.
You may go.
Attempting to buy the silence of a former "acquaintance" for political purposes using a "shell" company that close to the 2016 Election is not only considered an unreported campaign contribution/expense, but it was also "red-flagged" by the financial institution as a suspicious transaction!
That does count!