Yes and John Hopkins was very embarrassed when Cecilia Dhejne the author of one of the studies McHugh and Mayer quoted heavily from pointed out thatthey lied about her research.
Top Pediatrician Says Pushing Transgender Ideology on Kids Is 'Child Abuse'
- Thread starter Angel4Truth
- Start date
Yes and John Hopkins was very embarrassed when Cecilia Dhejne the author of one of the studies McHugh and Mayer quoted heavily from pointed out thatthey lied about her research.
So you don't want to respond to the question of why conservatives repeatedly use well-known frauds to back them up.
And you can't present any of the 'legitimate sources' you claim exist.
I understand you have nothing to back yourself up with and that you aren't remotely honest enough to admit that
Ah the pervert claim. Classy that.
glorydaz
Well-known member
I did respond. You just don't understand plain good old commons sense. I told you that would be the case.
glorydaz
Well-known member
You libs are the ones who cite frauds. That you point your slinky little digits at conservatives doesn't mean there is anything to see there.
I'm disgusted by you liberal lying fools who can't even see the gutter you wallow around in. Swamp dwellers!
glorydaz
Well-known member
Wow...that is such a low blow. :rotfl:
yep, youre a pervert too.
per·vert
verb
verb: pervert; 3rd person present: perverts; past tense: perverted; past participle: perverted; gerund or present participle: perverting
pərˈvərt/
1.
alter (something) from its original course, meaning, or state to a distortion or corruption of what was first intended.
glorydaz
Well-known member
If I were them, I'd be embarrassed to even admit I supported such deviant behaviour. They have no shame...which speaks of a seared conscience. :nono:
Recent news:
5 Times ‘Transgender’ Men Abused Women And Children In Bathrooms
Top 25 stories Target’s Pro-Transgender Bathroom Policy Is Dangerous to Women and Children
Lots of just recent examples in those 2 articles, i could post them on and on. These suffice to show you wrong.
ClimateSanity
New member
What you consider a fraud is not a fraud to us.
ClimateSanity
New member
We don't give a crap what you consider to be a legitimate source.
ClimateSanity
New member
It's deeper than any sociological study could find out. You don't measure in God's ways.
Really? So why do anti-gay conservatives use well-known frauds and fake research to back up their claims?
Common sense says it because they don't care that they are fakes and lies and that the anti-gay lot is desperate to justify their prejudice that they will stoop to any level. But maybe you have some other insight.
Can you back this up or is just a lie?
Yeah Angel has a long history of trolling and personal attacks.
Like Mayer and McHugh when they lied about the legitiamte research of others
number 1. The New York Daily News (2/17/16)reports that the man was not transgender and never claimed to be but rather someone trying to attack the transgender with this publicity stunt
Number 2. Christopher Hambrook was determined to have multiple mental illnesses and rated as a high re-offense risk during psychiatric assessments, during which he admitted he was not transgender. Perhaps rather than scapegoating the transgender population we should ask why a man who had shown himself willing and able to sexually assault children and the disabled and showed no remorse whatsoever and was judged by his psychiatrist to be at high risk of reoffending was released after spending only four years in jail.
Number 3. Richar Rodriguez was not transgender. He was a man who dressed in women’s clothing in order to enter the women’s bathroom and film women there.
Number 4. Jason Pomare was not transgender. He was a man who dressed in women’s clothing in order to enter the women’s bathroom and film women there.
Number 5. I don't know why this is even included other than your source couldn't find any real examples
Do you have any that are actually true?
Glorydaze is the one that brought that up. And it is painful that you don't care about truth.
Well, that is obvious. Who needs the facts to make a decision?