toldailytopic: Should Knight be banned from TheologyOnline?

[elohiym]

God heavens no. Bob Hill is alive and well.

Glad to hear it.

I could have sworn I read on TOL somewhere that he passed. :idunno:

 

[elohiym]

I'm going to watch this thread VERY closely!

Come on! Put Knight in the red for just two hours. :chuckle:

Wouldn't that be a sight?

 

[ebenz47037]

Glad to hear it.

I could have sworn I read on TOL somewhere that he passed. :idunno:

I think you're talking about Bob B. I miss him.

 

[Psalmist]

toldailytopic: Should Knight be banned from TheologyOnline?​

Should Knight be banned? No, not really. Besides I couldn't think of anything that Knight would do to get banned.
​

 

[elohiym]

I think you're talking about Bob B. I miss him.

I must have been thinking of Bob B.

Thanks, Nori.

 

[TomO]

Should Knight be banned from TheologyOnline?

lain: I don't know how it could be done....he never breaks the rules.

I guess we could have a trial and falsify some evidence....it's worked before. :think:

Knight is the Law

 

[Zeke]

I'm going to watch this thread VERY closely!

Thats why they have all been politically correct so far.

 

[Lon]

God heavens no. Bob Hill is alive and well.

Good heavens too! and "Whew!" even!

I was deeply regretting a major faux pas!

 

[Lon]

Come on! Put Knight in the red for just two hours. :chuckle:

Wouldn't that be a sight?

As long as there is a HUGE madi gras-like build-up days before it happens...

If it isn't something spectacular, like with even a pinata winning contest, I'm out.

 

[GuySmiley]

Yes, he should . . . for promoting drinking, smoking, and carousing while being interesting. Shameful!

 

[ghost]

In Case Knight Gets Banned

 

[Ask Mr. Religion]

Yes, ban Knight. Make Hilston the site admin during the banishment period.

AMR

 

[webby]

lain: I don't know how it could be done....he never breaks the rules.

I guess we could have a trial and falsify some evidence....it's worked before. :think:

Knight is the Law

Yes, he should . . . for promoting drinking, smoking, and carousing while being interesting. Shameful!

You guys are making a compelling case. :think:

 

[Nathon Detroit]

Yes, he should . . . for promoting drinking, smoking, and carousing while being interesting. Shameful!

For if I am an offender, or have committed anything deserving of TOL banishment, I do not object to being banned; but if there is nothing in these things of which these men accuse me, no one can deliver me to them. I appeal to the Webmaster.

 

[elohiym]

As long as there is a HUGE madi gras-like build-up days before it happens...

If it isn't something spectacular, like with even a pinata winning contest, I'm out.

Did you have a poster in mind for the piñata?

:noid:

 

[ghost]

Yes, ban Knight. Make Hilston the site admin during the banishment period.

AMR

Is that YOUR decree?

 

[elohiym]

For if I am an offender, or have committed anything deserving of TOL banishment, I do not object to being banned; but if there is nothing in these things of which these men accuse me, no one can deliver me to them. I appeal to the Webmaster.

But you teach the people to not pay tribute to Webmaster, and claim you are the most interesting man in the world.

"Ban him! Ban him!"

 

[elohiym]

Yes, ban Knight. Make Hilston the site admin during the banishment period.

Well, if he does that through the holiday season, I suspect Christmas celebration on TOL will be forbidden.

 

[annabenedetti]

Someone better listen to the wife this time.

 

[chrysostom]

Knight needs to put a Catholic in the hall of fame
and
it does not have to be me
but
if he doesn't, some will say I am not there because I am Catholic