The two covenants are the Old Covenant and the New Covenant.
The OC was Hagar, born from the slave woman.
The NC was Sarah, born from the free woman.
ECT "Things that are different" included Gentiles
- Thread starter heir
- Start date
The two covenants are the Old Covenant and the New Covenant.
The OC was Hagar, born from the slave woman.
The NC was Sarah, born from the free woman.
It was.
God divorced the House of Israel, scattered them amongst the Gentiles, told them they were not a people, and had no mercy on them. But, God said one day He would return to them.
For over 700 years, these millions and millions of Israelites from the 10 lost tribes had been living amongst the pagan Gentiles, and had intermingled with the pagan Gentiles.
By the time the first century came (over 700 years later), it was impossible to tell know who these descendants were. Most of them could not be distinguished from a Gentile.
Making the NC with both Jews and Gentiles is how God kept His promise to the House of Israel.
Interplanner
Well-known member
That's not how it is done. Sorry you have to give your private recipe! You have to take all of them together and all the contexts of each together.
I doubt if you can explain yours anyway.
The faith was once for all delivered to the saints. it is not a private party like you want it to be.
Interplanner
Well-known member
Your first entry here validates what I'm saying in other posts, and your 2nd one has no proof other than the mighty Mind of RD. How do you know? Please work in the realm of reasons, not the realm of the mighty domain of the Mind of RD.
Jerry Shugart
Well-known member
So all men have had their sins forgiven even though not all men believe?
Right Divider
Body part
God's revelation to mankind is PROGRESSIVE. That's because He did NOT reveal ALL of His plans at once.
Since you CANNOT understand His FIRST MENTION of a thing, you are hopeless.
Christ Jesus made the one time sacrifice for ALL sins.
Having our sins paid for was part of the New Covenant.
(Heb 9:15) For this reason Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance--now that he has died as a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant.
As we see above, sins committed under the OC were paid for at the cross, because the New Covenant was made.
His 'one size fits all' bucket.
Jerry Shugart
Well-known member
Why do you not answer my question?:
So all men have had their sins forgiven even though not all men believe?
Smart people here know that.
Right Divider
Body part
One would think that of all people: one who holds to the Mid-Acts Dispensational Viewpoint that in a way, Acts 17:11-12 is the basis of - one would think such an individual would find it refreshing that a valid point is allowed no matter who or what side makes it.
Titus 1:12-13
Proverbs 27:17.
Eph. 4:16
Lol, you're truly hopeless to seeing the obvious about you and your pals.
heir
TOL Subscriber
:chuckle:
Interplanner
Well-known member
Actually RD, the genetic situation of the time matches the miserable geo-political situation I outlined in the essay on the 2 circumstances of 1st century Judea. The genetic would be a 3rd.
You don't know the power of God, then. He can create an 'ethne' out of rocks. But he did create one out of the disaster that Israel was in the 1st century.
heir
TOL Subscriber
These Gentiles (which include us) are fellowheirs and of the same body (beginning with Paul 1 Timothy 1:16 KJV) with the Jews and Greeks (Romans 1:16 KJV) to whom Paul was first sent (heirs according to the promise (Galatians 3:29 KJV) and partakers of Christ by the gospel (1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV)
Ephesians 3:6 That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:
As to your satanic perversion of the above passage, we are not fellowheirs with Israel as God is not finished with Israel/they have a future (the one you are trying to steal for yourself (Matthew 19:28 KJV, Hebrews 8:8 KJV and so on).
To quote RD's words to Tel's practice of same "I love how you flutter like a butterfly from "translation" to "translation" until you get the one that suits your "needs".
Well, that and your various commentaries and dictionaries used by you in that same way.
Lol - your old school ways are even older than mine.
Mine agreeing more with the study practices of a now also old school that arose after yours.
At least, from what I have noticed in the resulting conclusions of one school or another and the study methods and practices said results cannot but always point back to.
Personally, I continue to find all fascinating.
heir
TOL Subscriber
BY the cross, not AT the cross
We have now received the atonement (Romans 5:11 KJV), but Israel waits for it (Acts 3:19-21 KJV). You know, the covenant you keep trying to make yours (Romans 11:26-27 KJV) not to mention hijack this thread about. Go open your own thread.
heir
TOL Subscriber
She wants the power of God to be anything, but the preaching of the cross (1 Corinthians 1:18 KJV).
So you keep telling EVERYONE that does not adhere to your 'one size fits all'.