patman
Active member
thelaqachisnext said:Q.Why does the angel assume Daniel's knowledge of such written Scripture of Truth?
A. -because the writings of 1 Enoch said he saw all the tablets written in heaven, which were written there so that the angels would read them and know all events which were to happen to the sons of Adam, on earth, until the end of this present creation and the beginning of the New Creation [Which Enoch told of]. -which is why Gabriel had authority to "bind" the prince of Persia, upon the Written Word He read in heaven -which Michael came to aid him in the "binding" of the prince of Persia, as "two sons of God agreeing, as touching the revealed will of God"
"Confounding of the languages does not mean that no one knew how to speak or write or read the first language! and where does it say that the original language of Adam -through to Noah- was done away with? Chapter and verse please!
......
Also, Patman, You aren't being logical about languages and about records from before the flood, which Moses had access to when he included the genealogies of the patriarchs and of Cain's genealogy, also, in Genesis. do you not see your own contradiction of yourself?
Moses wasn't there, but he wrote from records recorded before the flood -all the way to after, at Babel. Where did Moses get the pre-flood records?
Enoch was written in a relatively young language, not a 5000 year old language.
The point of confusing the languages was so no one could understand the other and to divide the world into nations, allowing them to speak the original language is self defeating.
I already showed you in Gen 10:1-4ish where the languages were established 300 years before Abram, you can count for yourself the years from these men to Abram in chapter 11... Abram WASN'T present during the language change. Notice how he already had a nation to migrate to... had he been alive during the language change, Canaan would not yet exist.
God told Moses the Genealogy from before the flood, or it was passed down by word of mouth through time. Names do not change where language do.
The bottom line is still that the original language is lost, the language Enoch is written in is new, and your sources thus far that are extra biblical have been found lacking. You like them so much you try to impose them in the Word where it isn't, that is what people do when they are bias about something.
Job cried "Oh that God had written a book!" According to this statement, God hadn't written anything yet... yet you say Job knew all about Enoch, a inspired book of God, as you say. It just isn't true, even Job doesn't acknowledge it as he wishes something had been written.