Asked often and answered as much. Why do you continue to seek contention in this manner?
Mine:
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4202313#post4202313
Yours? :idunno:
As to your implied notions, I suspect not a few believers cannot point to a single defining moment of their re-birth. So, if you are seeking to make "a lightning bolt" experience the litmus test of true re-birth your argument is with many more than just us poor Calvinists. Such is today's widespread evangelical stress on some amazingly emotional, out-of-this-world feeling. What is clear from the Epistles in Scripture is not a teaching to seek dramatic conversion but a story of the Church's life in building up everyone - whether they are abounding or abasing. GM, would Cornelius pass your "testimony" test, after all, it pales by that of Paul's? Yet he received the same efficacious (saving) grace as did Paul. Is not re-birth as mysterious as the blowing of the wind, so that no person is able to tell when it actually takes place?
I think
point in time conversion creates an impossible working environment for pastoral ministry. Hence I see that spiritual growth is for all of life. We are told to make our calling and election sure by giving diligence to add to our faith. Insofar as we do so we are being renewed or converted daily. Pastors should be very critical of the notion of people constantly trying to live in a conversion moment or re-producing that moment in which their emotions are aflame with passion. It is a seeking of
experience over
transformation. It is an unwillingness on some folk's part to actually seek maturity and, instead, want to recapture an emotional feeling. In fact, most of these folks do not feel like they're growing unless the emotional feelings are present. Inevitably this results in folks saying "they don't
feel saved". This why the church is often full of happy-clappy nonsense, re-baptisms, "let go and let God", and so on as the faithful struggle to maintain the emotional highs of some past onetime event.
One of the major pastoral problems associated with this
punctiliar conversion paradigm is its tendency to create a mindset which elevates experience over instruction. Rather than practice being made to conform to principle, it is usually the case that the "conversion" experience becomes the rule for distinguishing truth and falsehood. This seeking of fresh experiences or men that tickle itching ears from the pulpit is the difference between Christianity and Trinity Broadcasting Network.
The great strength of the linear conversion concept, as taught by the old standards, is that it is fully in keeping with everything our Lord has taught regarding the kingdom of God and its hidden but progressive nature. This leaves room for the humble practice of self-examination and self-denial as a part of true kingdom conversion. When Christians start to understand that faith is variously weak or strong depending upon the person and upon the season of their life they will stop looking for emotions as a substitute. For faith, it is, that clings to Christ ever. It is a faith that ever comes to Him as a beggar. It is a faith that is able to cry out, even when you don't feel converted, that simply says:
I believe! Help though my unbelief!
Critics of Calvinism need to master the difference between assertions and arguments. These critics need to become aware of their unexamined assumptions and learn that just because something
seems to be wrong to them, that creates no presumption that their perception is correct. These folks need to become cognizant of how often they beg the question and just intellectually freeload, pandering to the crowd for hi-fives, all the while expecting others to make their arguments for them.
If you, GM, have an honestly sincere question about that which I hold dear, please ask it in charity, and I will be happy to answer it to the best of my ability. I have extended you the courtesy of doing some heavy lifting here in hopes that you can see all is not as you think it is among Calvinists or other members of the faith. But when you seek, via odious one-liners, to call another's faith into question seeking ridicule of the same, they owe you nothing but a stern call to correction for breeding divisiveness.
AMR