But the money ain't. It ain't everlasting. And it don't bring happiness. And it ain't even real. None of it is real.
"Your money perishes with you."
Nope, the kids get it !!
But the money ain't. It ain't everlasting. And it don't bring happiness. And it ain't even real. None of it is real.
"Your money perishes with you."
Nope, the kids get it !!
It was to save sinners that Jesus Christ came into the world. He did not come to help them to save themselves, nor to induce them to save themselves, nor even to enable them to save themselves.
AMR
People do not save themselves, but they can of their own free will refuse Jesus' right to rule over them or to accept His rule.It was to save sinners that Jesus Christ came into the world. He did not come to help them to save themselves, nor to induce them to save themselves, nor even to enable them to save themselves.
AMR
Luke 19:27 27 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. |
When it suits you, "all" means each and every person who ever lived. Try imposing that more reasonably. See also John 12:32; 6:37; Luke 11:42; Acts 2:17; 10:12; Rom 14:2; 1 Cor 1:5; 2 Peter 3:9; 1 Tim 2:1-2, 4, 8; Matt 9:35. Cherry-picking Scripture to suit your purposes is not exegesis at all, Robert. :AMR1:
Proponents of general atonement like yourself cite general terms in three groups of texts to prove that God intended for Jesus to die for all humans without exception and that Jesus’ death is ineffective for some for whom He died.
(1) Texts containing the word “world”: John 3:16; 1 John 2:1-2; John 6:51; 2 Cor 5:19; John 1:9, 29; 3:17; 4:42; 1 John 4:14; John 12:46
(2) Texts containing the word “all”: 1 Tim 2:4-6; 2 Pet 3:9; Heb 2:9; 2 Cor 5:14-15; 1 Cor 15:22; Rom 5:18
(3) Texts allegedly depicting the perishing of those for whom Christ died: Rom 14:15; 1 Cor 8:11; 2 Pet 2:1; Heb 10:29
None of these texts substantiates general atonement. To the contrary, these texts uphold definite atonement without any contradiction. Proponents of general atonement cite John 3:16, for example, but a right understanding of God’s love, τὸν κόσμον, and πᾶς ὁ πιστεύων perfectly harmonizes with definite atonement; as David used Goliath’s own sword to sever Goliath’s head, so proponents of definite atonement may use John 3:16 to refute general atonement. The same is true of the other passages, such as ἱλασμός and ὅλου τοῦ κόσμου in 1 John 2:2, οἱ πάντες in 2 Cor 5:14-15, ὁ ἀδελφός in Rom 14:15 and 1 Cor 8:11, and τὸν ἀγοράσαντα αὐτοὺς δεσπότην ἀρνούμενοι in 2 Pet 2:1.
AMR
It was to save sinners that Jesus Christ came into the world. He did not come to help them to save themselves, nor to induce them to save themselves, nor even to enable them to save themselves.
AMR
There comes a point where we must admit that we don't know. If we are going to give Pate credit then here it is.
We don't know everything. Robert Pate has uncovered our dirty little secret.
I know who my savior is and it is not John Calvin.
The olive branch has been extended to you many times. In fact to many times. So many times that the message is clear.
Now I'm going to help you Robert Pate.
John 3:16 is going positive. And so am I.
It has been positive for over 2000 years.
He has to tell us who his people are and what they did.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=109848
Pate's hero ( and savior) Robert Brinsmead