You don't understand that that is another scripture.
Well duh. Of course it's another scripture. I'm answering your silly questions that have nothing to do with the topic and that are libellous against me with scripture.
You don't have understanding, JR.
Saying something doesn't make it true.
The red herring is you saying 'red herring'.
That's not how it works, GT. But I'm not about to go into how red herrings work when it has nothing to do with the topic of the trinity.
So please, try to stay on topic.
What do you think?
Are you staying on topic?
You certainly are not.
I'm trying to, but you are avoiding answering my questions, which are relevant to the topic of the Trinity.
Do you know what a hypocrite is?
Not relevant to this discussion about the Trinity.
GT, has man been getting better or worse?
Oh, no, not me. John wrote that around 2000 years ago.
Here is what he wrote, and I'll highlight the portions that I quoted above:
John 1:1
ʼΕν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὀ Δὁγος καὶ ὀ Δὁγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν Θεόν καὶ
Θεὸς ἦν ὀ Δὁγος
In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and
God was the Word
John 1:14
Καὶ ὀ Δὁγοσ σὰρξ ἐγένετο καὶ ἐσκήνωσεν ἐν ἡμῖν καὶ ἐθεασάμεθα τὴν δόξαν αὐτοῦ δόξαν ὡσ μονογενοῦσ παρὰ Πατρός πλήρησ χάριτος καὶ ἀληθείασ
And the Word flesh became, and dwelt among us, and we beheld the glory of him, a glory as of an only only-begotten with a Father, full of grace and truth.