I have been a baptized Jehovah's Witness for 40 years. I was baptized in 1975, after joyfully leaving the Southern Baptist Church.
I asked you if you belong to the church, your testimony appears to be no
I have been a baptized Jehovah's Witness for 40 years. I was baptized in 1975, after joyfully leaving the Southern Baptist Church.
That argument fails because Jesus is the only begotten (created through reproduction) Son of God.
Any being created through production instead of reproduction is not God.
The trinity doctrine defies both logic and rational explanation, but that doesn't seem to dampen the trinitarian's resolve to protect AT ALL COSTS this complex theological formula. The anger & agitation caused by anyone questioning the trinity doctrine is actually puzzling....does this betray a lack of confidence in this so-called unquestionable "party-line" of all of the ministers in Christendom?
The name YHWH comes from two causative participles of the Aramaic HYH and HWH verbs. We have Origen's special column thanx to Eusebius copying it from the Hexpla. This is a horrible translation, and there is no person in Hebrew names. All Hebrew names are also made from participles which tend to be shorter than their verbs.
JWs make more sense than you do, and they're an obvious cult. JWs don't appear to be as confused as you are.
No, pops.
The internal and external evidence is clear....the NT was written in Greek.
When one listens, one learn.
When one talks, they don't.
You loose on this one Keypurr. The gospels may contain some aramaic words but they were written in greek.
You loose on this one Keypurr. The gospels may contain some aramaic words but they were written in greek.
I guess it depends on which history book you read. Greek was used in the West but Aramaic was used in the East in the early church. But the originals were in Hebrew and Aramaic.
I guess it depends on which history book you read. Greek was used in the West but Aramaic was used in the East in the early church. But the originals were in Hebrew and Aramaic.
Reference?
He'll give you the Aramaic-English New Testament. Right Keypurr?
Probably....and the one that he has loaded on his tablet with no reference whatsoever...lol...
How about the Peshitta English Aramaic Critical Edition.
a compilation, annotation and translation of the Eastern original Aramaic New Testament Peshitta Text.
www.AENT.org
Check it out
The Peshitta is not the original NT language, pops.
Maybe you need to read more, check it out, it is worth your time and money.
Show us a scholarly reference which supports the Peshitta.
Why, you not believe it anyway.