God's Truth
New member
What? This? "Then you are an admitted walking FALSEHOOD."
Well, you'd be the one to know what the devil sounds like, so....... :idunno:
I do know. He is the accuser. You are making all kinds of accusations.
What? This? "Then you are an admitted walking FALSEHOOD."
Well, you'd be the one to know what the devil sounds like, so....... :idunno:
God is #1 - :first:Saying God is a first, second, and third is not scripture. That goes against the scriptures.
So when someone comes in first place, another in second, and another in third---according to you they are all first? And you say I speak perversion?
I do know. He is the accuser. You are making all kinds of accusations.
We could do it the other way around if it would make you happy. The Spirit is first which is why blaspheming the Holy Spirit is an unpardonable sin. Or Jesus is first because He created all things. Or the Father could be 3rd because He gave all power to the Son. Or.....
Point being there is no race, ringy dingy.
God is ONE being who is not in competition with Himself.
SPIRIT.
I have told you that so many times. Can you retain what your opponent says?
So look in the written word for the word "added" in reference to GOD becoming man.I will, ONCE AGAIN, stick with what the BIBLE says.... that the Word that was God was made flesh.
I'm only speaking about humanity being "added" to GOD specifically, not that GOD didn't humble HIMSELF to the form of creation, but that nothing had to be added to GOD the omniscient and omnipotent, in order for that to take place.Well, God the Father made the world through Jesus. God made the plan for salvation to be through the man Jesus; He made that plan before He made the world. So I believe that humanity had to be experienced by God.
I don't deny any part of what you said I refuse except for that humanity had to be added to GOD. It isn't scriptural, or maybe it is and you just don't feel like showing it. And no; if GOD so chose; GOD could embody clay. That is pretty much what happened, not that Jesus was merely clay.
So look in the written word for the word "added" in reference to GOD becoming man.
Man wasn't added to GOD.
i posted the actual scripture and all possible derivatives, moment of which equal "add"
Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk
You're my opponent? Wow.
The last I heard, you were claiming "They were the same God with different titles."
Who knows what pronouncements of yours I'm supposed to memorize as if they were God's words. :chuckle:
I'm only speaking about humanity being "added" to GOD specifically, not that GOD didn't humble HIMSELF to the dorm of creation, bit that nothing had to be added to GOD the omniscient and omnipotent, in order for that to take place.
Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk
You don't know I am your opponent?
I have been telling you they were the same Spirit.
They are the same one and only Spirit.
Could be. I'm just trying to get you to stop preaching a false Gospel.
God is a spirit being.
But God is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
You can't seem to comprehend the depth, and height, and breadth and length of God. His fullness escapes you. You're missing out. That's sad.
There is NO SUCH THING as "first place, second place and third place" in the trinity doctrine. They are simply LABELED with a number for REFERENCE purposes.So when someone comes in first place, another in second, and another in third---according to you they are all first? And you say I speak perversion?
You fixate on something that you do not understand. The Word did not occupy a human body and now He does. Call that whatever you want.So look in the written word for the word "added" in reference to GOD becoming man.
Man wasn't added to GOD.
i posted the actual scripture and all possible derivatives, moment of which equal "add"
Who is saying to do otherwise?I will, ONCE AGAIN, stick with what the BIBLE says.... that the Word that was God was made flesh.
There is NO SUCH THING as "first place, second place and third place" in the trinity doctrine. They are simply LABELED with a number for REFERENCE purposes.
Yes, you pervert every legitimate doctrine that you can.
Pretty sure we aren't to add to scripture like placing the words "add" or " person" to the nature of GOD and then calling it scriptural and those who disagree stupid.Took upon Him is not adding?
Taking upon Himself humanity is not adding?
Well, what I see is a fella who strains at a gnat, but swallows a camel.
Pretty sure we aren't to add to scripture like placing the words "add" or " person" to the nature of GOD and then calling it scriptural and those who disagree stupid.