Yeah, just as I thought. You can't do it. I knew that you'd never even bother to make an attempt because you knew that you had said was a lie when you typed it. If what you're suggesting here were true then science would be meaningless and useless. Sure people can lie but that doesn't mean the evidence (data) does.Take the data cherry-picked to prove a point that was predetermined?
Nope
Give me the raw data set. I'll make it say anything you want.
The data used in those charts is not "cherry picked". It's as straight forward as can be. Its simply cumulative infections over time after getting those shots. The people got the real shot showed very significantly less infection than those who got a placebo. You might want to pretend that you have the ability to make those numbers say something else but you're full of it. It wouldn't matter how you presented it. The data is the data. The shots work for at least several months and that a fact - period.
And while break through cases are clearly on the rise, they are not so much so that they are the drivers of this current surge in the Delta variant. The increase in current cases is being driven by those who listen to folks like you and the other fear mongers on this thread and then don't go get the very effective vaccine that, while not COMPLETELY harmless, is certainly far less harmful than the disease it prevents.
Clete