The problem is and was that the church relocated and hid homosexuals among unsuspecting folks. By not reporting those priest to the police who molested children the church emboldened those priest who preyed on kids.Actually it is about how the innocent priests during the pedophilia, are all also victims of violent crime, which is my answer to charges against the Church, that seems to indicate complicity with these violent criminal child raping paedophiles, who lied and deceived and hid the truth from all the good Christian innocent priests. There was no deliberate consent nor full knowledge on their part. They were tricked by wicked tricksters, who are literally the worst of the worst violent criminals, who target children.
Stop it.
Liberal Logic 101 states that pedophilia aimed at boys and youths by males isn't homosexual.
It also doesn't change the fact that it is rape. It is rape against children by homosexuals.
The problem is and was that the church relocated and hid homosexuals among unsuspecting folks. By not reporting those priest to the police who molested children the church emboldened those priest who preyed on kids.
Liberal Logic 101 states that pedophilia aimed at boys and youths by males isn't homosexual.
* Queen of Denial: Wayne Besen, director of the pro-homosexual Truth Wins Out, denied that any child sexual molestation could even theoretically be of a homosexual nature. Bob Enyart explained that many male child molesters hurt only girls, and many female molesters hurt only boys, and that these people are heterosexual child molesters. Likewise, while there are adult bisexuals, there are also bi-sexual child molesters. And male molesters who only rape boys are homosexual child molesters and females who only molest girls are lesbian molesters. Wayne Besen denied all this. T.W.O.'s director seemed completely uninterested in statistics regarding male on male and female on female child molestation occurring at rates that far exceed the percentage of homosexuals in society, which provide evidence of greater risk to children from homosexual adults. |
Who do the Bishops report to ? I believe everyone from the Pope on down knew of the molesting, but it seems like they wanted to protect the churches image at the expense of the kids, sadly.Let's talk about that. A thumbnail lesson in Catholic Church Governance 101:
Every diocese is its own autonomous entity. Much like a state, the governor of one state has nothing to do with other sates. If Cuomo turned out to be moving sicko assistants around, that is not a stain on America, its just a stain on him.
A bishop is like the governor of a diocese. There is only one bishop (and an auxiliary bishop) in each diocese. Hundreds of priests and brothers, but just one bishop. He runs the show.
So, a few bishops shuffling priests around is not the same as "The Catholic Church" shuffling priests around. Let's be clear.
And for the fourth time: I am not excusing bad behavior, I am just giving perspective.
Who do the Bishops report to ?
I believe everyone from the Pope on down knew of the molesting
. . . . . but it seems like they wanted to protect the churches image at the expense of the kids, sadly.
No TG there were many many children involved who were molested by priest. The cover up was what most folks , even Catholics in my own family, found so hard to take. Yes, we are all sinners but we should all try to protect the kids not cover up for the molesters.Nobody. It is actually a common misconception that the Pope manages them. The Pope has SUPREME authority on doctrinal matters, teaching and so forth. But in matters concerning basic governance and administrative stuff, the pope actually does not have anything to do with that stuff in other dioceses.
I cannot stop you from believing what you want to, but I can assure you that, for example, a pope with all he has to do, does not know nor is he interested in the administrative transfers of priests around the world.
And remember, as has already been demonstrated: The "molesting" you speak of was actually priests and young men having sex. With that in mind, yes, popes probably knew it was happening, but let's really think about that for a second: We are saying that popes knew that priests sin. OMG REALLY? Well, everyone sins. Priests, Popes and everyone's Auntie Mimi and Uncle Joe sins. If we kicked every sinner out of the Church there would be no Church. Just as with everyone else, it is assumed that a person who sins will repent and confess and sin no more.
I don't believe that any modern era pope ever thought that way. I really don't.
EDIT: Homosexual men in the priesthood was debated at one time, and the conclusion made perfect sense but did not work out in reality. The thought was, we are all sinners, and we are called not to sin. If a homosexual does not sin (i.e. he remains abstinent from sex) then he is the same as the rest of us, right? People prone to gluttony, people prone to drinking, people prone to sex in general, gambling, anger . . . . . we all have our thing right? Shall we bar all sinners from the priesthood? There would be no priesthood if we did. That was the thinking. It makes sense, on paper. Sadly, in reality, it did not work out so well.
No TG there were many many children involved who were molested by priest . . . .
. . . . Yes, we are all sinners but we should all try to protect the kids not cover up for the molesters.
No I believe every person priest or not should have had a day in court to face their accusers, but that was all but impossible with their church reposting them and hiding their crimes.Helloooooo . . you are not hearing meeeee. . . .
Wikipedia? The same site that has a million and one lies about Trump? The same site that has a million and one lies about conservatives?
I say again: We saw how fake new strung out a 4 year long massive propaganda campaign of lies against Trump so please do not think them incapable of doing the same thing to the Church too.
Few people know the truth about this topic. I am one of them thank God.
One thing: Where ae the court convictions in all those cases. Can you please point to a few and the sentences they received? In America, with the exception of a couple of showcase trials, almost every priest barred from the priesthood never had a day in court. Do you approve of that? Are you now on the side of the liberals, guilty until proven innocent?
The Spotlight team at the Boston Globe did an amazing job of tracking down and exposing that pandemic of pedophilia in the Roman Catholic "church".No I believe every person priest or not should have had a day in court to face their accusers, but that was all but impossible with their church reposting them and hiding their crimes.
And the Roman Catholic Church hid and sent those child molesting priest to un- suspecting parishes over and over.You people, and I'm sorry to say that it's every last one of you itt, are so willing to conflate homosexual offense with violent crime (child rape---all rape is violent, even if it doesn't leave a mark, even if it's "statutory"---there's a reason we have an age of consent), that it's appalling and worrisome. And unfortunately I doubt you're in the minority in your respective communities, families, and churches for those of you who "go to church," and the prospect of this widespread myopia is troubling.
You're barking up the wrong tree! You're barking up the tree with homosexual offenders in it, but the truth is that the right tree to be barking up, is the one with the violent criminals in it!
You're inured. And it's because they're all liars, up that tree are the most dangerous violent criminals, they're so dangerous that if they're ever caught and convicted and they're sent to prison, the other inmates try to kill them right away, because even the prison population knows more than you all do, about how dangerous they are. They'll kill you as soon as look at you, they're right from the pit of hell, and when they lie they speak their native tongue, and it's that last one that has you all barking up the tree of homosexuals, which is largely a tree full of non-violent non-criminals.
I don't think any of you understand how dishonest, duplicitous, deceitful and devious these violent criminals are, these aren't the "armed robberies" populating our prisons, these ones exploit naivete, targeting it like a guided missile, and striking with precision, these are the minds that concoct ways to not only rape children, but also to serially murder, child molesters /child rapists /pedophiles /paedophiles and serial murderers are of the same ilk.
They all either want to rape children, or murder innocent people, or both, or even more, with impunity. This is the type of violent criminal that descended upon the Catholic priesthood. That they were Catholic priests is as significant as if they were all garbagemen instead, it's just the occupation that these wickedly deceitful violent criminals decided to exploit, they saw it as an advantageous position, from which to strike their victims, who were all children, except for if they needed to murder an adult, who might expose their violent crimes (child rape) to law enforcement.
Mass murder is "grievous sin" too, so is rape, so is perjury---but so is all offense against chastity; masturbation, premarital heterosexual relations, adultery and homosexual offense. One category is violent crime, and the other category is not.Now you listen to me Bub, I don't defend any evil doer so you watch your mouth. If you would read more and talk less, you would have seen what I posted: I said: "just to be clear, I am not excusing those priests. Them having sex with 15, 1 and 17 year old boys was still a grievous sin"
No, I'm not. I'm a mouthpiece for human rights, and against paedophiles, child rapists, child molesters. Violent criminals.You are a mouthpiece for the Catholic and Christian hating fake news media.
I don't know any Catholics like you. I'm from Boston, and we're just not like you in this diocese.Congratulations. Make sure you genuflect on your way out.
The reason these most dangerous of violent criminals, and others like them, are able to get away with their violent crime---no matter where they're getting away with it---is because they are liars, and are so deceptive that lying is their native tongue. They exploit innocent naivete.And the Roman Catholic Church hid and sent those child molesting priest to un- suspecting parishes over and over.
Wrong, they got away with raping children because the RCC hid and covered their crimes to protect their phony image.The reason these most dangerous of violent criminals, and others like them, are able to get away with their violent crime---no matter where they're getting away with it---is because they are liars, and are so deceptive that lying is their native tongue. They exploit innocent naivete.
And once they get moved, then they just get back to raping kids. That's what they do. They live to rape children. That's all they care about, that's all they value. Like serial killers who have the same violent criminal tendencies, but who also murder on top of the raping. They have one interest. And they'll do anything to satisfy it.
Apparently you do not understand the problem within your own "church". The "church" moved these pedophile child rapists around within the "church" so that they could continue to do their perversion to child after child WITHIN the "church". They HID the problem so that these perverts were able to continue for YEARS and YEARS with CHILD AFTER CHILD.They all either want to rape children, or murder innocent people, or both, or even more, with impunity. This is the type of violent criminal that descended upon the Catholic priesthood. That they were Catholic priests is as significant as if they were all garbagemen instead, it's just the occupation that these wickedly deceitful violent criminals decided to exploit, they saw it as an advantageous position, from which to strike their victims, who were all children, except for if they needed to murder an adult, who might expose their violent crimes (child rape) to law enforcement.