This isn't the first time we've had a reset. I caused one of them.
Or, because if it had happened to one person it would have been remarkable enough, but it wasn't just happening to one or two people, but to a large and exclusive group of them and happening when it wasn't happening to anyone else. That's why when the opening objections came in there wasn't a Glory to point to. She came on the heels of the complaints.
My best bet is that no one in soots would like to see her rep page put on public display or set out as a chronological record. Not blaming her at all, mind you, only stating that if someone who could do that did it I know what we'd see.
But forget that. Here is the narrative that illustrates the problem easily enough:
Two posters, call them
A and
B
Both arrive about the same time. Both develop a number of friendships and general good will.
A is more conservative and gravitates to soots.
The reset happens.
Inside a day
B sees his rep received averages increase a good bit as people respond to the reset. Now
B's old averages had managed, over time, to put him in the position to hit the rep ceiling and cause an earlier rep reset, only to move again to the ceiling and remain ahead of most until this one.
And, again, his averages and his participation are both up in the day or so following the reset.
A doubles his rep anyway, without a post, without being present.
How?
Only two possible answers. Either a large group of people are moving through and repping her old posts or a small number with rep power they aren't capable of having without an undisclosed advantage are doing it.
Either way, people are gaming the system.
Because neither of those was happening to
A before the reset and none of what began to happen was happening outside of soots like it was inside of soots.
Couple that with an observation of similar rising totals across a limited number of people with a rather singular unifying trait and you have a statistical happening that isn't happening by accident.
This isn't guesswork. And I can repeat the example (because bizarre statistical odd men out happen) with a few others, did so at the time and settled on one of them as the example only because I knew if she figured out that I was talking about her it wouldn't upset her.
And I looked for the exceptions, the break. I looked across every friend I had who was active, including and I didn't find them, let alone an offset that would look like what I saw with my active soots friends. I was doing better than about anyone outside of soots in that day, which given my position at the time of the reset makes sense.
What doesn't make sense is how present, active soots members found themselves so dramatically outside of any reasonable predictor.
At least someone in soots knows what I'm saying is true. Likely more. In any event I've told the truth and set it out.That's all I mean to do to begin with.
:e4e: