That we are able to reveal through joking, the absurdity of these guidelines for women vs men , makes you wonder why they weren't laughed off the floor when they were presented.
THAT IS THE KEY: way too much power in academia.'cause feminists are humorless old hags
scary humorless old hags, who have way too much power in academia
The men should be considered criminal for taking advantage of drunk women, not the women.Unless of course a drunk husband beats his wife
It is THE WOMAN'S responsibility to take care of, protect, and do what is best for herself.
That is what fairness and equality, automony, all that stuff women always spout out to men is.
It is not a crime to take advantage of women, as women take advantage of men all the time, every day. They use them for money, they use their assets to tempt them to their bidding, they expect what you just demanded simply because they are female..
By your logic, the women's prisons should be bigger then the men's.
Just stop while you are behind :up:
Very apt and relevant :thumb: Kuddos
If what you are saying is true, then women have the same status as children, with men playing the adults. Do I really want a surgeon, a lawyer, a judge, a real estate agent who is a mere child? By your standard, women have no business in the professions.The men should be considered criminal for taking advantage of drunk women, not the women.
So, no, we don't need more women prisons.
No matter how much anyone wants men and women to be equal, they are not. Never have been.
From the beginning, it was man's responsibility to care for and protect women.
The same applies to adults vs. children.
They are not equal. And if an adult sexually abuses a child that happen to get drunk, it is the adult that is the criminal of abuse, not the child.
The men should be considered criminal for taking advantage of drunk women, not the women.
No matter how much anyone wants men and women to be equal, they are not. Never have been.
From the beginning, it was man's responsibility to care for and protect women.
The same applies to adults vs. children.
They are not equal.
And if an adult sexually abuses a child that happen to get drunk, it is the adult that is the criminal of abuse, not the child.
Absolutely - yet we are being vicitmized by the male dolts and idiots who do no such thing: On the contrary, they embrace it. Folly, vanity and worse than vanity. So what's the solution?Adversarial System- one is presumed innocent, the accuser must prove guilt
Inquisitorial System- one is presumed guilty, the accused must prove innocence
They want an inquisitorial system for men accused of a crime against a woman. Nothing else needs to be said- you dismiss it, call them insane, and move on
Well, it is commanded in Scripture to avoid it so it is more than just a "good idea".
Well, yes, as far as the fact that the head of children are adults, and the head of women is men.If what you are saying is true, then women have the same status as children, with men playing the adults.
One's profession has nothing to do with who their head is.Do I really want a surgeon, a lawyer, a judge, a real estate agent who is a mere child? By your standard, women have no business in the professions.
I think though that if men are the head, then the professions would be there, and one's profession indeed should reflect whether you are a leader or merely one to be protected. Either men and women are equal, or women should be in the home. Either/Or. Cannot have it both ways. Equal persons/ or men and their helpmates, women.Well, yes, as far as the fact that the head of children are adults, and the head of women is men.
In other words, (as the head) all adults should be responsible for watching out for and protecting all children. And (as the head) all men should be responsible for watching out for and protecting all women.
One's profession has nothing to do with who their head is.
But I'll go even further and say that I believe women should not be working outside the home.
I believe a whole lot of societies problems are a result of women flooding the job market.
I have concerns, but we need to see more detail and how it will work out.
currently the balance of justice is massively with the accused, and the victim is often the one who receives rough or no justice.
the status quo is not an option.
Well said. :thumb:Very true. But the answer to an injustice is never another injustice.
That's a social thing which is frowned upon, it is not nor should it be a crime.
If a women consents, she consents. If she feels bad about it later, then it's her fault she got drunk and made bad decisions.
Speaking of which, a lot of women don't care about themselves so much as to avoid circumstances of rape, but instead of working on that at all, it's now progressed into what you are saying now- that yes sometimes means no.
You want my personal opinion? If yes means no sometimes and men should take THEIR accountability, then take away women's voting rights since they aren't accountable enough for themselves, let alone the interests of society.
So you admit that that women petitioning for what is as far as I can tell an inquisitorial system of rape are, in fact, being infants :think:
Women have more rights and privilege then men. You are right, they aren't equal. However, it's the complete opposite of who you think is getting the short end of the stick_
skybringr, is that you?
I can change my IP anytime I want, it's impossible to get rid of me biitch, I'll make you responsible for me terroizying the hell out of you all the way you do everyone else