The "miracle" of evolution is a myth - part 1

[Alate_One]

Are you a rock?

Explain why you get a headache if I hit you on the head with a rock if you aren't a rock?

Maybe you've been hit in the head by too many rocks? Viruses can attack an organism because their proteins fit into a "slot" on the surface of the cell. If humans had nothing physically to do with animals, why should they have such similar "slots" to those found in animals (specifically mammals in this case)?

 

[marke]

Maybe you've been hit in the head by too many rocks? Viruses can attack an organism because their proteins fit into a "slot" on the surface of the cell. If humans had nothing physically to do with animals, why should they have such similar "slots" to those found in animals (specifically mammals in this case)?

Why assume similarities in physical characteristics or similarities in DNA mean Darwinism disproves God?

 

[ok doser]

Maybe you've been hit in the head by too many rocks? Viruses can attack an organism because their proteins fit into a "slot" on the surface of the cell. If humans had nothing physically to do with animals, why should they have such similar "slots" to those found in animals (specifically mammals in this case)?

Who is saying that humans have nothing physically to do with animals? We were all created by God. It's obvious to me that the similarities of mechanisms on a cellular level are due to that intelligent design.

 

[marke]

Who is saying that humans have nothing physically to do with animals? We were all created by God. It's obvious to me that the similarities of mechanisms on a cellular level are due to that intelligent design.

Human biology is far too complicated to have been created by dumb luck or whatever stupid method unsaved sinners think may have done it. Natural selection is not God and has less evidence of being real than God has.

 

[ok doser]

Human biology is far too complicated to have been created by dumb luck or whatever stupid method unsaved sinners think may have done it. Natural selection is not God and has less evidence of being real than God has.

Natural selection only makes sense if you reject God as the Creator.

 

[marke]

Natural selection only makes sense if you reject God as the Creator.

Natural selection is unscientific. It has not been observed, measured, or proven to be fact.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Natural selection is unscientific. It has not been observed, measured, or proven to be fact.

Don't overstate your position.

Natural selection DOES occur.

What DOES NOT occur, however, is the gain of function through natural selection, as natural selection" can only REMOVE the unfit, not make a species more fit.

 

[marke]

Don't overstate your position.

Natural selection DOES occur.

What DOES NOT occur, however, is the gain of function through natural selection, as natural selection" can only REMOVE the unfit, not make a species more fit.

Yes, evolution occurs, but not Darwinian macroevolution. Real evolution and real natural selection are terms that only describe what is better described as God-given natural abilities to adapt to changing environments and circumstances.

 

[Right Divider]

Yes, evolution occurs, but not Darwinian macroevolution. Real evolution and real natural selection are terms that only describe what is better described as God-given natural abilities to adapt to changing environments and circumstances.

That was exactly JR's point. This means that your earlier statement was incorrect.

Natural selection is unscientific. It has not been observed, measured, or proven to be fact.

 

[marke]

That was exactly JR's point. This means that your earlier statement was incorrect.

Calling natural adaptations evolution is a dishonest trick of the devil and the deluded.

 

[Right Divider]

Calling natural adaptations evolution is a dishonest trick of the devil and the deluded.

I enjoy how you always divert attention away from your false statements. Very childish.

 

[marke]

I enjoy how you always divert attention away from your false statements. Very childish.

Are you saying my clarifications are right but do not agree with your misinterpretations of my original statements?

 

[Right Divider]

Are you saying my clarifications are right but do not agree with your misinterpretations of my original statements?

I'm saying :

• You make a false statement.
• Someone points it out.
• You do not repent of your false statement.
• You try to divert instead of taking responsibility for your original false statement.

 

[marke]

I'm saying :

• You make a false statement.
• Someone points it out.
• You do not repent of your false statement.
• You try to divert instead of taking responsibility for your original false statement.

You are being uncharitable. I will go back and explain myself for you.

 

[marke]

Natural selection is unscientific. It has not been observed, measured, or proven to be fact.

Natural selection as portrayed by evolutionists to explain the evolution of different species is unscientific. Evolutionary natural selection of Darwinian evolution of the species has not been observed, measured, or proven to be fact. Secularists take natural God-given abilities and add fictional powers to support Darwinian evolution which is a lie and is not scientific.

Here is an evolutionary view that does not demonstrate or prove natural selection drives Darwinian evolution:

Understanding Natural Selection: Essential Concepts and Common Misconceptions - Evolution: Education and Outreach

Natural selection is one of the central mechanisms of evolutionary change and is the process responsible for the evolution of adaptive features. Without a working knowledge of natural selection, it is impossible to understand how or why living things have come to exhibit their diversity and...

evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com

Natural selection is one of the central mechanisms of evolutionary change and is the process responsible for the evolution of adaptive features. Without a working knowledge of natural selection, it is impossible to understand how or why living things have come to exhibit their diversity and complexity. An understanding of natural selection also is becoming increasingly relevant in practical contexts, including medicine, agriculture, and resource management. Unfortunately, studies indicate that natural selection is generally very poorly understood, even among many individuals with postsecondary biological education

 

[Right Divider]

@marke
It would have been great if you could have said that in the first place. Then we would not need to tell you that you were making false statements.

 

[marke]

@marke
It would have been great if you could have said that in the first place. Then we would not need to tell you that you were making false statements.

I'm sorry I was not more specific in my first statement.

 

[Right Divider]

I'm sorry I was not more specific in my first statement.

You can the edit post (i.e., correct it).

 

[marke]

You can edit post (i.e., correct it).

Of course. However, I did not know I was going to be misunderstood.

 

[Right Divider]

Of course. However, I did not know I was going to be misunderstood.

Once you knew, why not just edit it?
Why all of the stubbornness?