Thanks for telling me what I believe. Appreciate that. Perhaps you would care to explain the background microwave radiation.
It's not my opinion, it's your moronic strawman. Are you a moron?
You mean the book that believes the universe is trillions of years old? Is believing a religion made up by a crackpot superior to the fact that actually the universe is 13.7 billion years old? Maybe reality is inferior for crackpots.
No, I think you will find that it gives SOME answers that actually WERE stolen from real science, some of which were corrected after the publication of the Book of Plagiarism thereby freezing in print things that were subsequently shown to be wrong, and lies that misrepresent the real science amongst which they are interspersed.
Yes plagiarism, it steals without reference to the original authors. The only reason the author (a Mr. Sadler, by the way) is left as "mysterious" is that he should have been up for theft of intellectual property. As it is, he waited until a significant number of the important "contributing" scientists who did the real work had died (Rutherford and Einstein, for example) before abusing their memory with the publication of this grubby and forgettable little effort.
The WHAT?? Hilarious.
But you don't have the first clue about what is true. You have demonstrated that on numerous occasions. And you don't understand intellectual honesty, and you clearly don't respect intellectual property.
"If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants".- Isaac Newton
You, on the other hand, are standing on the shoulders of crackpots looking backwards at the ideas science rejected, as much as the ones it kept as good. Your book just steals from giants. I suppose if you have nothing to offer humanity, you can always steal something from those who do have something to offer, and offer that to us instead. Of course it is immoral and illegal to do that without asking, and without citing the source.
Here is my own quote from the Urantia Book, Ch57 (note the acknowledgement of the source there Caino, it is something you also do that your book of theft fails to do):
57:1.3 987,000,000,000 years ago associate force organizer and then acting inspector number 811,307 of the Orvonton series, traveling out from Uversa, reported to the Ancients of Days that space conditions were favorable for the initiation of materialization phenomena in a certain sector of the, then, easterly segment of Orvonton. |
Now, if you didn't laugh at this extract as poorly-constructed science fiction then you are as gullible as the most ignorant Young Earth Creationist. The YEC believes the earth is less than 10,000 years, and the UB follower believes the universe is at least 987 billion years old. The YEC must believe the distance from New York to Los Angeles is a matter of a few miles, and the UB promoter must think it is more than 207,000 miles, actually the distance traveled in circumnavigating the earth nearly 33 times. Moronic.
This appears a little earlier:
57:1.1 Urantia is of origin in your sun |
No it's not. Planets that can support our kind of life have elements that arose in a supernova. Our sun (presumably the one to which it refers, since we do call our star the sun) has never been a supernova and will never be one. Also moronic.
I note that there is one thing you fail to do, Caino, and it is that you never post any of this kind of really absurd nonsense from the UB. Are you afraid to do that?
You seem to have this egocentric attitude that it is only you who knows what is written in the Tracts That Stole Without Acknowledgment (showing no confidence in the likelihood that anyone would read the vast tracts of it you discourteously copy - ironically - and paste here).
And what is the theory of "fostered evolution" that explains the evidence at least as well as natural selection explains the fact of evolution?
Stuart