The Late Great Urantia Revelation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Caino

BANNED
Banned
It's the opposite. Please go to your nearest university religious studies class where you will get out from under your cult consciousness and learn some truth about Christian beliefs. For example do you know why God Most High was called that? Do you know that EL was the Canaanite name for the planet Saturn and that astrology is firmly embedded within the Gospels? Is this in the Urantia? Do even Bible book idolators know of this? No. And this is why these ancient ideas keep recycling without understanding because modern people fail to realize they were pertaining to astronomical events given anthropological mythologies, e.g. the birthday of the sun at the Winter's Solstice.

Oh, I thought you had actually read the book that you don't agree with. Typical! But yes, we know what El means.


YAHWEH—GOD OF THE HEBREWS

96:0.1 IN CONCEIVING OF DEITY, man first includes all gods, then subordinates all foreign gods to his tribal deity, and finally excludes all but the one God of final and supreme value. The Jews synthesized all gods into their more sublime concept of the Lord God of Israel. The Hindus likewise combined their multifarious deities into the “one spirituality of the gods” portrayed in the Rig-Veda, while the Mesopotamians reduced their gods to the more centralized concept of Bel-Marduk. These ideas of monotheism matured all over the world not long after the appearance of Machiventa Melchizedek at Salem in Palestine. But the Melchizedek concept of Deity was unlike that of the evolutionary philosophy of inclusion, subordination, and exclusion; it was based exclusively on creative power and very soon influenced the highest deity concepts of Mesopotamia, India, and Egypt.

96:0.2 The Salem religion was revered as a tradition by the Kenites and several other Canaanite tribes. And this was one of the purposes of Melchizedek’s incarnation: That a religion of one God should be so fostered as to prepare the way for the earth bestowal of a Son of that one God. Michael could hardly come to Urantia until there existed a people believing in the Universal Father among whom he could appear.

96:0.3 The Salem religion persisted among the Kenites in Palestine as their creed, and this religion as it was later adopted by the Hebrews was influenced, first, by Egyptian moral teachings; later, by Babylonian theologic thought; and lastly, by Iranian conceptions of good and evil. Factually the Hebrew religion is predicated upon the covenant between Abraham and Machiventa Melchizedek, evolutionally it is the outgrowth of many unique situational circumstances, but culturally it has borrowed freely from the religion, morality, and philosophy of the entire Levant. It is through the Hebrew religion that much of the morality and religious thought of Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Iran was transmitted to the Occidental peoples.


1. DEITY CONCEPTS AMONG THE SEMITES

96:1.1 The early Semites regarded everything as being indwelt by a spirit. There were spirits of the animal and vegetable worlds; annual spirits, the lord of progeny; spirits of fire, water, and air; a veritable pantheon of spirits to be feared and worshiped. And the teaching of Melchizedek regarding a Universal Creator never fully destroyed the belief in these subordinate spirits or nature gods.

96:1.2 The progress of the Hebrews from polytheism through henotheism to monotheism was not an unbroken and continuous conceptual development. They experienced many retrogressions in the evolution of their Deity concepts, while during any one epoch there existed varying ideas of God among different groups of Semite believers. From time to time numerous terms were applied to their concepts of God, and in order to prevent confusion these various Deity titles will be defined as they pertain to the evolution of Jewish theology:

96:1.3 1. Yahweh was the god of the southern Palestinian tribes, who associated this concept of deity with Mount Horeb, the Sinai volcano. Yahweh was merely one of the hundreds and thousands of nature gods which held the attention and claimed the worship of the Semitic tribes and peoples.

96:1.4 2. El Elyon. For centuries after Melchizedek’s sojourn at Salem his doctrine of Deity persisted in various versions but was generally connoted by the term El Elyon, the Most High God of heaven. Many Semites, including the immediate descendants of Abraham, at various times worshiped both Yahweh and El Elyon.

96:1.5 3. El Shaddai. It is difficult to explain what El Shaddai stood for. This idea of God was a composite derived from the teachings of Amenemope’s Book of Wisdom modified by Ikhnaton’s doctrine of Aton and further influenced by Melchizedek’s teachings embodied in the concept of El Elyon. But as the concept of El Shaddai permeated the Hebrew mind, it became thoroughly colored with the Yahweh beliefs of the desert.

96:1.6 One of the dominant ideas of the religion of this era was the Egyptian concept of divine Providence, the teaching that material prosperity was a reward for serving El Shaddai.

96:1.7 4. El. Amid all this confusion of terminology and haziness of concept, many devout believers sincerely endeavored to worship all of these evolving ideas of divinity, and there grew up the practice of referring to this composite Deity as El. And this term included still other of the Bedouin nature gods.

96:1.8 5. Elohim. In Kish and Ur there long persisted Sumerian-Chaldean groups who taught a three-in-one God concept founded on the traditions of the days of Adam and Melchizedek. This doctrine was carried to Egypt, where this Trinity was worshiped under the name of Elohim, or in the singular as Eloah. The philosophic circles of Egypt and later Alexandrian teachers of Hebraic extraction taught this unity of pluralistic Gods, and many of Moses’ advisers at the time of the exodus believed in this Trinity. But the concept of the trinitarian Elohim never became a real part of Hebrew theology until after they had come under the political influence of the Babylonians.

96:1.9 6. Sundry names. The Semites disliked to speak the name of their Deity, and they therefore resorted to numerous appellations from time to time, such as: The Spirit of God, The Lord, The Angel of the Lord, The Almighty, The Holy One, The Most High, Adonai, The Ancient of Days, The Lord God of Israel, The Creator of heaven and Earth, Kyrios, Jah, The Lord of Hosts, and The Father in Heaven.

96:1.10 Jehovah is a term which in recent times has been employed to designate the completed concept of Yahweh which finally evolved in the long Hebrews experience. But the name Jehovah did not come into use until fifteen hundred years after the times of Jesus.

96:1.11 Up to about 2000 B.C., Mount Horeb was intermittently active as a volcano, occasional eruptions occurring as late as the time of the sojourn of the Israelites in this region. The fire and smoke, together with the thunderous detonations associated with the eruptions of this volcanic mountain, all impressed and awed the Bedouins of the surrounding regions and caused them greatly to fear Yahweh. This spirit of Mount Horeb later became the god of the Hebrew Semite, and they eventually believed him to be supreme over all other gods.

96:1.12 The Canaanites had long revered Yahweh, and although many of the Kenites believed more or less in El Elyon, the supergod of the Salem religion, a majority of the Canaanites held loosely to the worship of the old tribal deities. They were hardly willing to abandon their national deities in favor of an international, not to say an interplanetary, God. They were not universal-deity minded, and therefore these tribes continued to worship their tribal deities, including Yahweh and the silver and golden calves which symbolized the Bedouin herders’ concept of the spirit of the Sinai volcano.

96:1.13 The Syrians, while worshiping their gods, also believed in Yahweh of the Hebrews, for their prophets said to the Syrian king: “Their gods are gods of the hills; therefore they were stronger than we; but let us fight against them on the plain, and surely we shall be stronger than they.”

96:1.14 As man advances in culture, the lesser gods are subordinated to a supreme deity; the great Jove persists only as an exclamation. The monotheists keep their subordinate gods as spirits, demons, fates, Nereids, fairies, brownies, dwarfs, banshees, and the evil eye. The Hebrews passed through henotheism and long believed in the existence of gods other than Yahweh, but they increasingly held that these foreign deities were subordinate to Yahweh. They conceded the actuality of Chemosh, god of the Amorites, but maintained that he was subordinate to Yahweh.

96:1.15 The idea of Yahweh has undergone the most extensive development of all the mortal theories of God. Its progressive evolution can only be compared with the metamorphosis of the Buddha concept in Asia, which in the end led to the concept of the Universal Absolute even as the Yahweh concept finally led to the idea of the Universal Father. But as a matter of historic fact, it should be understood that, while the Jews thus changed their views of Deity from the tribal god of Mount Horeb to the loving and merciful Creator Father of later times, they did not change his name; they continued all the way along to call this evolving concept of Deity, Yahweh.



Caino
 

freelight

Eclectic Theosophist
time capsules.....

time capsules.....

The Urantia is b.s., somebody's obsessive fantasy rewrite of the existing biblical fables. To see how Urantia writers are earth-bound creatures like the rest of us one only has to note their reliance on earth-bound celestial observation of the seven "planetary rulers" of our ancient men's understanding of an earth-centered cosmos, this limitation being projected out to create Urantia seven universes, etc.

Welcome to the thread,...on our first page we also have a link to our charter thread on the UB (intro.) The UB has admittedly used the schools of knoweldge at that point in time during the revelation, augmenting or enhancing such when appropriate. The revelators however does give us a clearer picture of the cosmos with its 7 superuniverses and a most wonderful cosmology far surpassing anything the Bible could reveal about how the universe operates, the great heirarchy of sons of God, and most notably the ascension plan of evolutionary mortals who choose to do God's will. I dont get too much into the science shared anyways,...my fields are more philosophic/religious.

Urantia writers took Abrahamic Jewish and Christian myths as real history which historical discovery routinely overturns as these biblical myths fall, e.g. the Exodus mythology, the David and Solomon Greater Israel mythology that even Israeli archeologists now say are national fictions. This revealing includes the Story of Jesus mythology that now is being traced back to Alexandrian Jews writing in the 2nd Century about the mysterious Christ the Magician cult figure whose legend seems to have arisen somewhere between 100 BC and 100 AD.

Yes, the UB assumes or carries on from much of the original stories of the Bible, but adds more info. or makes some corrections. Myths have their place in most ancient cultures. Kind of a mythicist myself, - we have threads on the Pagan origins of the Christ Myth, and I've taken a liberal/eclectic view in general.

Never trust books that are full of ton's of verbiage about spiritual matters. That's a first clue they don't know what they're talking about but are trying very hard to snow those ignorant of history and Abrahamic religious borrowings.

First read/research the content of the book or channeled information, then you can draw a more reasonable/informed conclusion, and also continue to learn more.


Such as...

"1,973 BC. His coming was unspectacular; his materialization was not witnessed by human eyes.... his mission was embodied in the simple statement which he made to this shepherd, "I am Melchizedek, priest of El Elyon, the Most High, the one and only God."

When one discovers how scribes and priests of Judah remade pagan deities into Hebrews this Melchizedek nonsense might end as it should. Please research the Vedic connection to the Abraham mythology where Brahma became Abraham and Brahma's consort, Sarasvati, became Sarah, and Ghaggar-Hakra became Hagar. As for Melchizedek, you might want to check the derivation of that name because where Hebrews say "Melech" means "King" linguistic derivation says "Melech" is derivative of "Moloch", and indeed the god of Abraham demands a very Moloch type of burnt firstborn son sacrifice. Moloch was a god of war and again we see Melchizedek honoring Abraham's war victory with a eucharist meal. The mythology built around Melchizedek shows how easy it is to remake ancient religious mythologies into something politically expedient for cultural control through religion.

I've noted the connection between Brahma/Abraham, Sarah/Saraswati, - we can draw many wonderful parallels and common myth origins for many themes in our religous history, a blending of archetypes. Melchizedek certainly has his place and memory connected to some of our ancient mystery schools and occult sciences.


pj
 

waterbear

BANNED
Banned
"Oh, I thought you had actually read the book that you don't agree with. Typical! But yes, we know what El means."

Oh, but I tried to read the big fat Urantia book and because it mixes fact with science-fiction just like Hubbard did it just reads like gobbledigook for this person who doesn't like historical facts and religious mythologies combined in snow jobs. Like I say and I say it as a spiritual visionary, never trust books full of verbiage about spiritual matters which are quite simply grasped when authentically of God and not man, or aliens as the case with Urantia.
 

freelight

Eclectic Theosophist
adventures in space......

adventures in space......

"Oh, I thought you had actually read the book that you don't agree with. Typical! But yes, we know what El means."

Oh, but I tried to read the big fat Urantia book and because it mixes fact with science-fiction just like Hubbard did it just reads likegobbledigook for this person who doesn't like historical facts and religious mythologies combined in snow jobs. Like I say and I say it as a spiritual visionary, never trust books full of verbiage about spiritual matters which are quite simply grasped when authentically of God and not man, or aliens as the case with Urantia.

As a spiritual visionary myself,...the wonderful cosmology revealed in the UB is pretty awesome. I draw from many sources which all come from the One Source. Sounds like your sweeping with a broad brush to dismiss the whole of the book, for a few mythological or scientific quandaries the book may have, but seems your issues go back to the biblical records themselves.

Your affiliation is as 'Christian (Other)' - I went by that years ago here, but have since gone beyond in my journey (see profile/bio). Seems your view is pretty heterodox when it comes to the bible's authenticity, or what is your view on it as a reliable source for true wisdom or revelation? Or is there a primary text or approach that you consider the best at this time to draw from?


pj
 

Caino

BANNED
Banned
"Oh, I thought you had actually read the book that you don't agree with. Typical! But yes, we know what El means."

Oh, but I tried to read the big fat Urantia book and because it mixes fact with science-fiction just like Hubbard did it just reads like gobbledigook for this person who doesn't like historical facts and religious mythologies combined in snow jobs. Like I say and I say it as a spiritual visionary, never trust books full of verbiage about spiritual matters which are quite simply grasped when authentically of God and not man, or aliens as the case with Urantia.

Thanks for clarifying your ignorance of the book and your short attention span. As a spiritual visionary and knee jerk skeptic, when you write your own bible to enlighten the world we will assume the same contempt prior to investigation.


Caino
 
Last edited:

waterbear

BANNED
Banned
As a spiritual visionary myself,...the wonderful cosmology revealed in the UB is pretty awesome. I draw from many sources which all come from the One Source. Sounds like your sweeping with a broad brush to dismiss the whole of the book, for a few mythological or scientific quandaries the book may have, but seems your issues go back to the biblical records themselves.

Your affiliation is as 'Christian (Other)' - I went by that years ago here, but have since gone beyond in my journey (see profile/bio). Seems your view is pretty heterodox when it comes to the bible's authenticity, or what is your view on it as a reliable source for true wisdom or revelation? Or is there a primary text or approach that you consider the best at this time to draw from?


pj

I'm a modern Gnostic Christian meaning my particular Gnostic path doesn't follow the classical Gnostic theology but is direct spiritual knowledge of God centered vs. adherence to established ancient formulations. These are new times and a new revelation is needed as we enter into a new aeon. I follow the Gnostic Solitary Path which means whatever my own religious views, yours are going to be your own and not mine as we are different individuals. This viewpoint is akin to the Native American idea that no man can tell another what to do. We arrive at union by recognizing a common Spirit uniting us all regardless of our particular spiritual paths. Goodness, being good people, i.e., helping others and not harming them, is universally recognized. This is what the Creator wants of us all; to transform human beings into humane beings.

So with this religious philosophy I find the goodness of God in many sources, even in the Bible! ;) a book that for my Gnostic Christian path does contain a "golden thread" of spiritual movement culminating in the universalization of the Spirit of Christ, the strongest spiritual emanation from the Godhead. So I can't and don't toss out biblical information. For example I find the Gospel of John to be the most spiritually truthful of all gospels even though I don't believe the Story of Jesus Christ it contains is real history. The Gospels are trying to historize into a single historical event a universal astro-theological mythology that was based on the ancient world's view of the cosmos as setting the archetypes for events on earth, "As above, so below". Why proto-Christian Jews wanted to do this is the real mystery of Christianity as it was a direct revolt against Jewish theology as well as being a return to pagan astro-theology albeit heavily disguised as the continuation of the Jewish messianic epic. There. Have I said enough words to give you some idea of where I'm coming from?

Ok, I'll add this in too: For me, God uses "Signs" for spiritual guidance, i.e., synchronicity happenings, and these can be "trigger" words found in Scriptures for one's spiritual consciousness to grasp some important concept needed to propel one forward in spiritual knowledge. But these "trigger" words can also be found anywhere, in the headlines of your newspaper or classified ads or telephone book. God can and does use anything that happens as communication. This is why libraries are the real Word of God and not any single book. My opinion but it's the best one around in my opinion. Take it from me. Please.
 

waterbear

BANNED
Banned
Thanks for clarifying your ignorance of the book and your short attention span. As a spiritual visionary and knee jerk skeptic, when you write your own bible to enlighten the world we will assume the same contempt prior to investigation.


Caino

Canine, or anyone, how do you use your own avatar here? There was these stock images you can use but no where I could find to use your own avatar image.
 

Caino

BANNED
Banned
Canine, or anyone, how do you use your own avatar here? There was these stock images you can use but no where I could find to use your own avatar image.

click user cp (top left hand on tool bar this page), then click"edit avatar" then scroll to bottom where you can upload from your computer files the pic you want. There are size limitations......ruff ruff!



Caino
 

waterbear

BANNED
Banned
click user cp (top left hand on tool bar this page), then click"edit avatar" then scroll to bottom where you can upload from your computer files the pic you want. There are size limitations......ruff ruff!



Caino

There is no option for using one's own images in my Edit Avatar screen. There's the displayed avatar or none as in my case and there is the pre-determined avatar selections. No place for imputing one's own image on my Edit Avatar page. Are newbie Edit Avatar pages different from yours?
 

freelight

Eclectic Theosophist
gnosis

gnosis

I'm a modern Gnostic Christian meaning my particular Gnostic path doesn't follow the classical Gnostic theology but is direct spiritual knowledge of God centered vs. adherence to established ancient formulations. These are new times and a new revelation is needed as we enter into a new aeon. I follow the Gnostic Solitary Path which means whatever my own religious views, yours are going to be your own and not mine as we are different individuals. This viewpoint is akin to the Native American idea that no man can tell another what to do. We arrive at union by recognizing a common Spirit uniting us all regardless of our particular spiritual paths. Goodness, being good people, i.e., helping others and not harming them, is universally recognized. This is what the Creator wants of us all; to transform human beings into humane beings.

So with this religious philosophy I find the goodness of God in many sources, even in the Bible! ;) a book that for my Gnostic Christian path does contain a "golden thread" of spiritual movement culminating in the universalization of the Spirit of Christ, the strongest spiritual emanation from the Godhead. So I can't and don't toss out biblical information. For example I find the Gospel of John to be the most spiritually truthful of all gospels even though I don't believe the Story of Jesus Christ it contains is real history. The Gospels are trying to historize into a single historical event a universal astro-theological mythology that was based on the ancient world's view of the cosmos as setting the archetypes for events on earth, "As above, so below". Why proto-Christian Jews wanted to do this is the real mystery of Christianity as it was a direct revolt against Jewish theology as well as being a return to pagan astro-theology albeit heavily disguised as the continuation of the Jewish messianic epic. There. Have I said enough words to give you some idea of where I'm coming from?

Ok, I'll add this in too: For me, God uses "Signs" for spiritual guidance, i.e., synchronicity happenings, and these can be "trigger" words found in Scriptures for one's spiritual consciousness to grasp some important concept needed to propel one forward in spiritual knowledge. But these "trigger" words can also be found anywhere, in the headlines of your newspaper or classified ads or telephone book. God can and does use anything that happens as communication. This is why libraries are the real Word of God and not any single book. My opinion but it's the best one around in my opinion. Take it from me. Please.

I agree with much of what you share, being an eclectic gnostic myself. You're welcome to join my 'Esoteric School of Gnostic Wisdom' if you like.

What I shared about the UB still stands, it is one of many valid sources to draw spiritual insight and wisdom from. - however if you havnet read significant portions of it and gotten a fair comprehension of its cosmology and spiritual vision, you really cant 'judge' it in fairness. In any case,....blessings in the Shekinah :)


pj
 

freelight

Eclectic Theosophist
There is no option for using one's own images in my Edit Avatar screen. There's the displayed avatar or none as in my case and there is the pre-determined avatar selections. No place for imputing one's own image on my Edit Avatar page. Are newbie Edit Avatar pages different from yours?

You may have to be member for a few weeks or have so many posts before you can upload your own avatar image. Subscribers have immediate access to such features. Need to check rule-descriptions......


pj
 

Caino

BANNED
Banned
After the resurrection Jesus appeared 19 times.

"Peace be upon you. While the Son of Man appeared on earth among the Jews, he came to minister to all men. In the kingdom of my Father there shall be neither Jew nor gentile; you will all be brethren—the sons of God. Go you, therefore, to all the world, proclaiming this gospel of salvation as you have received it from the ambassadors of the kingdom, and I will fellowship you in the brotherhood of the Father's sons of faith and truth."​

http://www.truthbook.com/index.cfm?linkID=1442



Caino
 

Caino

BANNED
Banned
“O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, and the people thereof, what slaves you are—subservient to the Roman yoke and victims of your own traditions—but I will return to cleanse yonder temple and deliver my people from this bondage!”

JESUS AT JERUSALEM
12 years old

"NO INCIDENT IN all Jesus’ eventful earth career was more engaging, more humanly thrilling, than this, his first remembered visit to Jerusalem. He was especially stimulated by the experience of attending the temple discussions by himself, and it long stood out in his memory as the great event of his later childhood and early youth. This was his first opportunity to enjoy a few days of independent living, the exhilaration of going and coming without restraint and restrictions. This brief period of undirected living, during the week following the Passover, was the first complete freedom from responsibility he had ever enjoyed. And it was many years subsequent to this before he again had a like period of freedom from all sense of responsibility, even for a short time......."



1. What really exists in the holy of holies, behind the veil?
2. Why should mothers in Israel be segregated from the male temple worshipers?
3. If God is a father who loves his children, why all this slaughter of animals to gain divine favor—has the teaching of Moses been misunderstood?
4. Since the temple is dedicated to the worship of the Father in heaven, is it consistent to permit the presence of those who engage in secular barter and trade?
5. Is the expected Messiah to become a temporal prince to sit on the throne of David, or is he to function as the light of life in the establishment of a spiritual kingdom?


http://www.truthbook.com/index.cfm?linkID=1377#U125_0_1



Caino
 

freelight

Eclectic Theosophist
“O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, and the people thereof, what slaves you are—subservient to the Roman yoke and victims of your own traditions—but I will return to cleanse yonder temple and deliver my people from this bondage!”

JESUS AT JERUSALEM
12 years old

"NO INCIDENT IN all Jesus’ eventful earth career was more engaging, more humanly thrilling, than this, his first remembered visit to Jerusalem. He was especially stimulated by the experience of attending the temple discussions by himself, and it long stood out in his memory as the great event of his later childhood and early youth. This was his first opportunity to enjoy a few days of independent living, the exhilaration of going and coming without restraint and restrictions. This brief period of undirected living, during the week following the Passover, was the first complete freedom from responsibility he had ever enjoyed. And it was many years subsequent to this before he again had a like period of freedom from all sense of responsibility, even for a short time......."



1. What really exists in the holy of holies, behind the veil?
2. Why should mothers in Israel be segregated from the male temple worshipers?
3. If God is a father who loves his children, why all this slaughter of animals to gain divine favor—has the teaching of Moses been misunderstood?
4. Since the temple is dedicated to the worship of the Father in heaven, is it consistent to permit the presence of those who engage in secular barter and trade?
5. Is the expected Messiah to become a temporal prince to sit on the throne of David, or is he to function as the light of life in the establishment of a spiritual kingdom?


http://www.truthbook.com/index.cfm?linkID=1377#U125_0_1


Caino

The questions above are posited to be what Jesus discussed with the sages - we read further this insightful description of how Jesus handled these dialogues -

125:5.8 And all the day through, those who listened marveled at these questions, and none was more astonished than Simon. For more than four hours this Nazareth youth plied these Jewish teachers with thought-provoking and heart-searching questions. He made few comments on the remarks of his elders. He conveyed his teaching by the questions he would ask. By the deft and subtle phrasing of a question he would at one and the same time challenge their teaching and suggest his own. In the manner of his asking a question there was an appealing combination of sagacity and humor which endeared him even to those who more or less resented his youthfulness. He was always eminently fair and considerate in the asking of these penetrating questions. On this eventful afternoon in the temple he exhibited that same reluctance to take unfair advantage of an opponent which characterized his entire subsequent public ministry. As a youth, and later on as a man, he seemed to be utterly free from all egoistic desire to win an argument merely to experience logical triumph over his fellows, being interested supremely in just one thing: to proclaim everlasting truth and thus effect a fuller revelation of the eternal God.

Concerning question #3 above -
What stands out still as glaring is the assumption of animal-sacrifice and the merit of some kind achieved in shedding blood. More peculiar is that the rebuilding of the 3rd Temple will reinstate these rituals and somehow be acceptable to the Jewish Messiah when he returns to rule his kingdom. I wonder if this is a step backward or forward? - again we ask what spiritual benefit or moral value will animal sacrifice grant Israel, and what good did it do even in the past? - people still needed to repent and transform themselves from within, whether there was an animal to sacrifice or not, so the killing of any creature here is questionable as even necessary, let alone moral.



pj
 

Caino

BANNED
Banned
Pilate

Pilate

Why was Pilate so afraid of the Jews, he was after all the Roman governor.



THE TRIAL BEFORE PILATE

http://www.truthbook.com/index.cfm?linkID=1437#U185_0_1


"Just as the Jews were about to engage in shouting their protests against the release of Jesus, a vast crowd came marching up to the praetorium for the purpose of asking Pilate for the release of a prisoner in honor of the Passover feast. For some time it had been the custom of the Roman governors to allow the populace to choose some imprisoned or condemned man for pardon at the time of the Passover. And now that this crowd had come before him to ask for the release of a prisoner, and since Jesus had so recently been in great favor with the multitudes, it occurred to Pilate that he might possibly extricate himself from his predicament by proposing to this group that, since Jesus was now a prisoner before his judgment seat, he release to them this man of Galilee as the token of Passover good will."​



Caino
 

freelight

Eclectic Theosophist
Personality

Personality

~*~*~

The Personality of the Universal Father


As shared before, one of the significant revelations shared in the Urantia Papers is the subject of 'personality', how that 'God' is a divine Personality, and the source of all personality as it expresses itself in every individual soul. Hence, God is the God of all personalities.

The above telecast is taken from Paper 1, The Universal Father, part 5. One may continue reading (and listen in audio format) part 6 & 7 on personality (last 3 sections) Here. More is shared at the bottom of this paper, part 6(last part) on 'The God of Personality' Here.




pj
 
Last edited:

bucksplasher

New member
UA seems to miss the even more enlightened concept of "three personalities in one" as the ultimate example of Love.

Has UA missed the fact that God most supreme attribute is love?

tWINs
 

Caino

BANNED
Banned
UA seems to miss the even more enlightened concept of "three personalities in one" as the ultimate example of Love.

Has UA missed the fact that God most supreme attribute is love?

tWINs

Hi Bucksplasher,

You should probably read about the Trinity in the UB (we don't know what UA is) first before implying that the Trinity isn't in the Urantia Revelation. http://www.truthbook.com/index.cfm?linkID=1255

After you read about the Trinity, Triunity's and Triodity's of the UB get back with us.



Caino
 

freelight

Eclectic Theosophist
Educate yourself before assuming...........

Educate yourself before assuming...........

UA seems to miss the even more enlightened concept of "three personalities in one" as the ultimate example of Love.

Has UA missed the fact that God most supreme attribute is love?

tWINs

The explanation of the Trinity in the UB is one of the most awesome/detailed descriptions given anywhere (exceeding a traditional/orthodox christian conception), and each member in that divine Trinity is revealed as a divine personality. The UB also reveals more about trinune relationships thru-out the cosmos, that have the Trinity as the master-source of such patterns.

Paradise Trinity

Also more on trinue and triodite relationships -

The growth of the Trinity concept

The UB wholly and consistently teaches that God is Love and that Love is expressed and realized 'relationally'. The whole revelation is a grand cosmology about these relationships.




pj
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top