:doh: You ONLY know me by my words on TOL. Have I said anything unChrist-like to you?
I am talking about overall main streamers fruit showing to the world.
It is no secret, brother.
:doh: You ONLY know me by my words on TOL. Have I said anything unChrist-like to you?
Sorry, I think "Canonicity" within the bounds of discussion. You must remember this isn't just a theology site but owned by Christians such that canonicity is pertinent to our forum. You aren't going to get traction with a report against such a concern, Joseph. Our collective concern is certainly concerned about the greater issue of the book than a line by line discussion of its contents.I am going to start reporting ppl that have nothing to say about the subject at hand..I cant believe you guys are this disrespectful...
And I dont care about the canon, we have been over that subject... I have only reported ONE post since I been here and I try hard to get along with most,, please have some respect.
I know enough about gnosticism to join in and share, I believe, and felt 'welcomed.' Nobody mentioned debate was not encouraged because I try hard to honor intentions of O.P.'s... we do not need to know anything about Gnosticisim but those who do know something about it are welcome to share.
Hebrews 9:27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, and after this judgment.Here are three sayings that I think speak about reincarnation.
(11) Jesus said, "This heaven will pass away, and the one above it will pass away. The dead are not alive, and the living will not die. In the days when you consumed what is dead, you made it what is alive. When you come to dwell in the light, what will you do? On the day when you were one you became two. But when you become two, what will you do?"
(18) The disciples said to Jesus, "Tell us how our end will be."
Jesus said, "Have you discovered, then, the beginning, that you look for the end? For where the beginning is, there will the end be. Blessed is he who will take his place in the beginning; he will know the end and will not experience death."
(51) His disciples said to him, "When will the repose of the dead come about, and when will the new world come?"
He said to them, "What you look forward to has already come, but you do not recognize it."
Sorry, I think "Canonicity" within the bounds of discussion. You must remember this isn't just a theology site but owned by Christians such that canonicity is pertinent to our forum. You aren't going to get traction with a report against such a concern, Joseph. Our collective concern is certainly concerned about the greater issue of the book than a line by line discussion of its contents.
From the second quote of the OP:
I know enough about gnosticism to join in and share, I believe, and felt 'welcomed.' Nobody mentioned debate was not encouraged because I try hard to honor intentions of O.P.'s
(39) Jesus said: The Pharisees and the scribes have taken the keys of knowledge (and) have hidden them. They did not go in, and those who wished to go in they did not allow. But you, be wise as serpents and innocent as doves.
See Matthew 10:16,Matthew 23:13
Hebrews 9:27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, and after this judgment.
:nono: For saying the GoT isn't canonical and to take it with a grain of salt? I don't think so. If this user left, it was not because of me. :nono:
(maybe for being mean to PJ if it was his/her best friend or something - but I'd have to say 'very thin skinned and shouldn't be on TOL' at that point)
I understand that the difference between canonical and non-canonical books is the fact that a group of religious leaders concluded the non-canonical books were not Spirit inspired. I am not particularly educated on the subject and since you said that you believe you fit into the body of Christ as a teacher, I was hoping you could explain to me the reasoning behind why these religious leaders' opinions should determine the credibility of these writings.
Sorry, I think "Canonicity" within the bounds of discussion. You must remember this isn't just a theology site but owned by Christians such that canonicity is pertinent to our forum. You aren't going to get traction with a report against such a concern, Joseph. Our collective concern is certainly concerned about the greater issue of the book than a line by line discussion of its contents.
From the second quote of the OP:
I know enough about gnosticism to join in and share, I believe, and felt 'welcomed.' Nobody mentioned debate was not encouraged because I try hard to honor intentions of O.P.'s
Lon can take His teaching of the canon elsewhere.. and are not needed HERE,
For the blind will lead the blind.
The credibility of these writing are not in question HERE.
Only the study of there of.
TAKE IT ELSE WHERE.
(39) Jesus said: The Pharisees and the scribes have taken the keys of knowledge (and) have hidden them. They did not go in, and those who wished to go in they did not allow. But you, be wise as serpents and innocent as doves.
See Matthew 10:16,Matthew 23:13
Lon can take His teaching of the canon elsewhere.. and are not needed HERE,
For the blind will lead the blind.
The credibility of these writing are not in question HERE.
Only the study of there of.
TAKE IT ELSE WHERE.
Ah yes, the PJ hour commercial.I held the former charter thread here at TOL on 'Reincarnation', but my older thread was deleted with many other older threads in the last server upgrade (making new space). Our current extant thread on the subject was taken up by me here, so those interested in seeing what we've covered so far, can inquire there. - I gather I still have some other religious traditions to cover, on their views on 'rebirth'. My pivotal exchanges with Cruciform on the similarities and differences of 'reincarnation' and 'resurrection' are there as well.
Your passage quote above is covered here, it does not in any way, shape or form discount neither disprove the concept of 'reincarnation'. Reincarnation in some form or another is at the heart of many of our fundamental religious systems in their esoteric schools, the 'principle' being integral to the eternal progression and perfection of souls, via the 'plurality of existence', 'multiple life-experiences' or 'soul-embodiments'. The subject has some subtle complexities among the various schools and theories concerning the 'mechanics' involved, but philosophically....the logic and wisdom of such holds thru-out.
A shorter term used instead of 'reincarnation' but referring to the same thing is 'rebirth', when understood in the proper context.
pj
lain: Heard this from every cult on the planet and no Christian.Lon can take His teaching of the canon elsewhere.. and are not needed HERE,
For the blind will lead the blind.
:rain:The credibility of these writing are not in question HERE.
Only the study of there of.
TAKE IT ELSE WHERE.
I understand that the difference between canonical and non-canonical books is the fact that a group of religious leaders concluded the non-canonical books were not Spirit inspired. I am not particularly educated on the subject and since you said that you believe you fit into the body of Christ as a teacher, I was hoping you could explain to me the reasoning behind why these religious leaders' opinions should determine the credibility of these writings.
PJ's his friend and Unknown left so he's a bit angry at the moment. Not typical for Joseph.I don't think your shoeing me away is helping your cause, though.
Lon you have no proof whatsoever for that statement. Pure dogma.Our N.T. is written the same. Every book was handed to us by apostles who had Apostle authority to give them to us.