Right Divider
Body part
No, it was not "confusing"... it was CONFUSED."Confusing". ( Grammar Police Badge Number 2838492 )
No, it was not "confusing"... it was CONFUSED."Confusing". ( Grammar Police Badge Number 2838492 )
Romans 8:35-36 KJVPaul never writes about shepherds of sheep. He never calls believers in the body of Christ "sheep".
Keep reading on to verse 37....Romans 8:35-36 KJV
(35) Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?
(36) As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter.
I will stick with Jesus, Peter, and Paul on this topic.Water baptism has no place in the body of Christ.
I know it doesn't always mean water.You have water on the brain in thinking that "baptize" always means water.
Baptism by the Holy Spirit does.The baptism of the Holy Spirit doesn't fit at all.
Just like a cult leader would say.I will stick with Jesus, Peter, and Paul on this topic.
There is NO WATER in THAT baptism. There is not a drop of water in the entire book to the Romans.Especially as I know this is how we enter into Christ. (Rom 6:3...."Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?" )
So you say, but you prove that you do not understand it in every one of your posts.I know it doesn't always mean water.
Water baptism was never about "burial" or "planting". It was always simply about cleansing for Israel and her priesthood.But to be likened to "burial", and "planting", as it is in Rom 6:4-5, water baptism fits the best.
The "planting" occurs by association without water."For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:"
The baptism into the body of Christ is baptism BY the Holy Spirit and NOT "of" the Holy Spirit.The baptism of the Holy Spirit doesn't fit at all.
Not in the body of Christ. You should join us.Water baptism is something "man" must do,
You continue to be totally confused. No doubt that you did not bother to follow the link that I gave you. It could help you, but only if you wanted to know the truth.while the baptism of the Holy Spirit is something God does in response to a real repentance from sin.
The context almost always makes it clear which is being referred to.
First off, in Heb 6 we are reminded of the "principals of the doctrine of Christ".Why are you convinced that Paul necessarily means baptize meaning water baptism, instead of baptize by the Holy Spirit only, and with no water?
Is it because of something outside Scripture, or something internal to the Bible?
"By", "For", they are the same thing.Baptism by the Holy Spirit does.
1Co 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free
Eph 1:13 In him you also, when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and believed in him, were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit,
No, it is not water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of past sins.Matthew 3:11 - he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire
Is that also a water baptism?
A follower of Jesus and His apostles will say it too.Just like a cult leader would say.
I guess you can prove that by the result of the baptism you did partake of.There is NO WATER in THAT baptism. There is not a drop of water in the entire book to the Romans.
That may be because the gift of the Holy Ghost is not often debated here.So you say, but you prove that you do not understand it in every one of your posts.
As the command by Peter in Acts 2:38 didn't involve any priests, we might be able to claim it is only for believing Israelites.Water baptism was never about "burial" or "planting". It was always simply about cleansing for Israel and her priesthood.
As per Rom 6, I don't believe you.The "planting" occurs by association without water.
Semantics.The baptism into the body of Christ is baptism BY the Holy Spirit and NOT "of" the Holy Spirit.
No way.Not in the body of Christ. You should join us.
I am not confused.You continue to be totally confused. No doubt that you did not bother to follow the link that I gave you. It could help you, but only if you wanted to know the truth.
So you're saying there's more than one Christian or Church baptism in the Bible.First off, in Heb 6 we are reminded of the "principals of the doctrine of Christ".
After repentance and faith, the doctrine of baptisms is cited.
Plural baptisms.
So is it possible that we're talking about different aspects of the same baptism then? Like a physical aspect and an eternal aspect, but both aspects being of the same thing?So we know there is more than one.
Second, is the context of any baptism related scriptures; some relate to something man must do while others point to what God will, or has done.
Third, sometimes one of the the fruits of the baptism is mentioned. (Acts 2:4,11, 10:46, 19:6, 1 Cor 12:10,28,30)
Especially the destruction of the old man and ensuing life without sin. (Rom 6:6-7,17-18,20,22)
Fourth, on a couple of occasion both baptisms are listed together. (Acts 10, 19, 1 Cor 6:11)
So according to you, you could be a "follower of Jesus and His apostles" or a cult leader. Great job!A follower of Jesus and His apostles will say it too.
You are what must be called a scripture twister. Paul says "freed from sin" and NOT "free from sinning".I guess you can prove that by the result of the baptism you did partake of.
As it was the means of the destruction of your old man of sin, (Rom 6:6), and your own death, (Rom 6:3-4), did it make you free from sinning? (Rom 6:7) ?
Jesus was not talking to you. This is a big reason why you continue to be extremely confused.That may be because the gift of the Holy Ghost is not often debated here.
Just Jesus' commanded water baptism.
Peter, also, was not talking to you.As the command by Peter in Acts 2:38 didn't involve any priests, we might be able to claim it is only for believing Israelites.
Cornelius was a gentile that blessed Israel. He was not a "generic" gentile.But Cornelius' case dispels that thought, as he was a Gentile.
Your bias has blinded you.So too, were the Philippian jailer and the twelve at Ephesus.
There is no water in Romans.As per Rom 6, I don't believe you.
It's not semantics, it's clearly different language with different meaning.Semantics.
"By", "Of", what's the difference?
That you don't what to be in the body of Christ (i.e., today's body of believers) is quite telling.No way.
I don't want to start sinning again, or walking in the flesh again !
I don't want to loose my communion with God or Christ !
Yes, you are.I am not confused.
Try these: https://graceambassadors.com/tradition/does-romans-6_3-4-teach-water-baptismI saw no link either.
Funny.Don't bother posting things that will lead me away from the faith.
Enjoy your surprise then Christ shows you the truth.The truth freed me from serving sin. (John 8:32-34)
Did your truth free you from committing sin?
Paul says that there is only one.So you're saying there's more than one Christian or Church baptism in the Bible.
The ONE baptism is not physical.So is it possible that we're talking about different aspects of the same baptism then? Like a physical aspect and an eternal aspect, but both aspects being of the same thing?
Obviously... this is why we must rightly divide the word of truth.There's obviously a difference between John's baptism (Acts 1:5, 19:4) and being baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus (Acts 8:16), and being baptized in the Holy Spirit.
Me and Hebrews 6:2 say that is so..So you're saying there's more than one Christian or Church baptism in the Bible.
No, as the water baptism done in the name of Jesus Christ is for the remission of past sins, while the gift of the Holy Ghost/baptism of the Holy Spirit is given by God to the truly repentantSo is it possible that we're talking about different aspects of the same baptism then? Like a physical aspect and an eternal aspect, but both aspects being of the same thing?
Yes, as the water baptism, post-resurrection of Christ, is done "in the name of Jesus Christ".There's obviously a difference between John's baptism (Acts 1:5, 19:4) and being baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus (Acts 8:16),
The baptism of/in the Holy Ghost is done by God, while the other baptisms, John's and in the name of Jesus Christ, are done by men.and being baptized in the Holy Spirit.
Nah, I am no leader.So according to you, you could be a "follower of Jesus and His apostles" or a cult leader. Great job!
If you see any difference between the two, say on.You are what must be called a scripture twister. Paul says "freed from sin" and NOT "free from sinning".
Jesus was talking to all who will submit to Him and to His Father.Jesus was not talking to you. This is a big reason why you continue to be extremely confused.
Peter, through the Holy Ghost, is talking to all who will submit to Jesus and His Father.Peter, also, was not talking to you.
He was a Gentile who honored God.Cornelius was a gentile that blessed Israel. He was not a "generic" gentile.
Thanks be to God, my love of God, and of His Son, has enabled me to see.Your bias has blinded you.
I disagree.There is no water in Romans.
My baptism "of" the Holy Spirit was done "by" the Holy Spirit.It's not semantics, it's clearly different language with different meaning.
More Freudian slips?That you don't what to be in the body of Christ (i.e., today's body of believers) is quite telling.
I disagree.Yes, you are.
I have checked those sites out previously and am just not interested in accommodations for sin.
That would be the truth Jesus said could free us from committing sin...right?Funny.
Enjoy your surprise then Christ shows you the truth.
No, you certainly are not.Nah, I am no leader.
Where are the grammar police nowBut I have been equipt to follow perfectly !
My doctrine agrees with the Bible, therefore it's true. Yours does not and is therefore false.Does your doctrine provide that freedom?
Finally, something we can agree on.No, you certainly are not.
I want a lawyer !Where are the grammar police now
Are you now a non-sinner?My doctrine agrees with the Bible, therefore it's true. Yours does not and is therefore false.
I am freed from sin, just like Paul says. Unlike your lie of "free from sinning", which appears nowhere in scripture.Are you now a non-sinner?
It is good to meet another non-sinner.I am freed from sin, just like Paul says. Unlike your lie of "free from sinning", which appears nowhere in scripture.