The fossil record shows there never was evolution.

Sonnet

New member
It was written or rather revealed by celestial beings who were here when Jesus was on the earth. In some cases they have been here since they planted life hundreds of millions of years ago. But let's not get this thread off track.

Sure.
 

Caino

BANNED
Banned
What makes you think there ever was an "ordinary secular history"? It never was- and pretending that it was and is a "history" in the modern sense is one of the great errors of Bibilcall literalists of all types.

I disagree, I think pretending that the Israelites were a miraculous people has become a great stumbling block for sincere truth seekers.

The surviving books of the Old Testament mention other books that did not survive. You may find a list of those books here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-canonical_books_referenced_in_the_Bible
 

Caino

BANNED
Banned
On the issue of Neanderthal DNA, non-Africans are the only ones who have it. Africans don't have it basically because the Neanderthals were in the area of Europe when they intermixed with other humans.

So if Noah's family were the carriers of Neanderthal DNA, and Eurasians got theirs from Noah's male descendants, ironically it didn't make it over to Africa.
 

6days

New member
Caino said:
The surviving books of the Old Testament mention other books that did not survive.
Yes, the OT mentions other books. Those books never were part of the OT. Likewise anybody can write a book and call it a gospel, but that doesn't make it God's Word.
 

6days

New member
Caino said:
Weather it's 20 % or 5 % or 1% it's still there. I was pointing out how that DNA would have to have come through Noah according to the flood story of the Hebrews.
The correct number is 99.7%. Neandertal is as fully human as you or me.

"In other words, a typical European and a Neanderthal are 99.7% similar over 96-98% of their DNA and 100% similar to a Neanderthal over 2-4% of their DNA. A sub-Saharan African will be 99.7% the same as a Neanderthal over 100% of their DNA.

So the 2-4% of a non-African person’s genome that is of Neanderthal origin will still be 99.7% similar to the matching stretch of DNA in an African person’s genome. In terms of the whole genome, that is only 0.006% of actual difference!"
http://genetics.thetech.org/ask-a-geneticist/human-neanderthal-similarity-africans-europeans

Caino said:
BTW, in 1934 UB readers knew that Neanderthals were much more intelligent than believed, ...But they weren't the sharpest tools in the shed, more advanced humans destroyed them roughly 40,000 years ago in Europe.
That is another example of false conclusions of of UB. We know Neandertals were intelligent...they may have been more intelligent than us. We don't know. (They did have slightly larger brains than us). And, we don't know what happened to Neandertals. Did they simply assimilate with other people groups? Did they die off because of genetic problems and disease as other people groups have done?

One thing we do know for certain is that these people loved and cared for each other. They were descendants of Adam and Eve. And these people were loved by their Creator, the God of the Bible.
 

Caino

BANNED
Banned
Outside of religious speculation, Neanderthals predate the arrival of Adam and Eve by hundreds of thousands of years. But there was an indication in the ancient Mesopotamian story of Adam and Eve, adopted by the Hebrews, that Cain feared people out in the world away from his parents tribe. God agreed with him.


Wiki


Neanderthals or Neandertals UK /niˈændərˌtɑːl/, us also /neɪ/-, -/ˈɑːndər/-, -/ˌtɔːl/, -/ˌθɔːl/)[3][4] (named after the Valley (=thal) of the Neander River area in Germany) were a species or subspecies of human in the genus Homo which became extinct between 40,000 and 28,000 years ago. They were closely related to modern humans,[5][6] having DNA over 99.5% the same.[7] Remains left by Neanderthals include bone and stone tools, which are found in Eurasia, from Western Europe to Central, Northern, and Western Asia. Neanderthals are generally classified by paleontologists as the species Homo neanderthalensis, having separated from the Homo sapiens lineage 600,000 years ago, or alternatively as a subspecies of Homo sapiens (Homo sapiens neanderthalensis).[8][9][10]

Several cultural assemblages have been linked to the Neanderthals in Europe. The earliest, the Mousterian stone tool culture, dates to about 300,000 years ago.[11] Late Mousterian artifacts were found in Gorham's Cave on the south-facing coast of Gibraltar.[12][13]

Neanderthals had a higher volume to surface ratio, with shorter legs and a bigger body, compared to Homo sapiens because they inhabited higher latitudes, in conformance with Bergmann's rule, and their larger stature explains their larger brain size because brain size generally increases with body size.[14] Their average cranial capacity of 1600 cm3,[15] was notably larger than the 1250 - 1400 cm3 average for modern humans, indicating that their brain size was larger. Males stood 164–168 cm (65–66 in) and females 152–156 cm (60–61 in) tall.[16]

The Neanderthal genome project published papers in 2010 and 2014 stating that Neanderthals contributed to the DNA of modern humans, including most non-Africans as well as a few African populations, through interbreeding, likely between 50,000 to 60,000 years ago.[17][18][19] Recent studies also show that a few Neanderthals began mating with ancestors of modern humans long before the large "out of Africa migration" of the present day non-Africans, as early as 100,000 years ago.[20] In 2016 research indicated that modern humans had three distinct interbreeding events with Neanderthals; the first encounter involved the ancestors of all non-African modern humans probably soon after leaving Africa, the second after the ancestral Melanesian group had branched off (and subsequently had a unique breeding event with Denisovans), and the third involving the ancestors of East Asians only.[21][22]

In December 2013, researchers reported evidence that Neanderthals practiced burial behavior and intentionally buried their dead.[23] In addition, scientists reported having sequenced the entire genome of a Neanderthal for the first time. The genome was extracted from the toe bone of a 50,000-year-old Neanderthal found in a Siberian cave.[24][25][26]
 

Caino

BANNED
Banned
Yes, the OT mentions other books. Those books never were part of the OT. Likewise anybody can write a book and call it a gospel, but that doesn't make it God's Word.

Those other books mentioned by the Old Testament weren't gospels, some of them appear to be secular history books as indicated by their titles. Conveniently they disappeared, the only books that did survive were the priestly books.
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Uh.... Not sure. Does that relate to Neandertals?
:chuckle:
Perhaps see Psalm 104:8
The mountains were pushed upward. This is not up for debate. What is open to discussion is how they got where they did.

Some simple rules of physical necessity based on what has to happen to get rocks to where they are rules out the possibility of old ages and any chance of finding evidence of evolution.
 

6days

New member
Outside of religious speculation, Neanderthals predate the arrival of Adam and Eve by hundreds of thousands of years.
Religious speculation (UB) about pre-adamites is wrong. Science has proven virtually everything wrong that evolutionists once taught about Neandertals. So, don't cling too tightly to your remaining speculations.
 

Caino

BANNED
Banned
Religious speculation (UB) about pre-adamites is wrong. Science has proven virtually everything wrong that evolutionists once taught about Neandertals. So, don't cling too tightly to your remaining speculations.

Outside of religious dogma is a whole different world. Science has proven the creation story of the Hebrews wrong on so many levels. But the authors and redactors of Genesis weren't scientist, historians or philosophers.

The UB revealed quite a bit about Neanderthals that science is just now proving to be correct.
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Outside of religious dogma is a whole different world. Science has proven the creation story of the Hebrews right on so many levels. The authors and redactors of Darwinism aren't scientist, historians or philosophers.
 

Sonnet

New member
Uh.... Not sure. Does that relate to Neandertals?
Perhaps see Psalm 104:8

No - it's just the way mountains are understood to form - through plate tectonics. The proof came too late for Velikovsky to take account of it.
 

Lon

Well-known member
The UB revealed quite a bit about Neanderthals that science is just now proving to be correct.

:nono:
Urantia Scam said:
The scientific facts stated for example are outdated and based on knowledge known only at the time the book was written. Highly irrelevant if it were communicated from a well advanced race of aliens. The described formation of the solar system is consistent with the Chamberlin-Moulton planetesimal hypothesis discarded in the 1940’s. Some species are said to have evolved suddenly from single mutations without transitional species, but the idea has not been supported since 1930. Controversial statements in the book support the idea of distinctive “spheres” in society based on physical differences such as color. According to Gardner, William S. Sadler and Wilfred Custer Kellogg who wrote some eugenicist works, had a hand in editing or writing the book, and that this is how the ideas were included. Another fact is that the book is said to have been published in 1955, giving more time for the editors to edit old scientific facts to satisfy the needs. Furthermore, in recent years the book had shown that it was edited again from its earlier versions, to include more accurate scientific facts, so they make it look like the whole thing was prophesied in 1911. -Urantia Scam
 
Last edited:
Top