None of which you would NEED to answer if you believed what the Bible actually says.
we do believe what the bible says -
but we have a different interpretation -
can you understand that?
None of which you would NEED to answer if you believed what the Bible actually says.
That is correct.Agreed.
So when you claim the Spirit has led you to a particular belief, and another believer claims the Spirit has led him to a contrary belief...
You would say, then, that he (the other believer) was wrong?
That it was not the Spirit (but rather human error) that led to that belief?
Is this right?
I do. Your "interpretation" is corrupt in every way.we do believe what the bible says -
but we have a different interpretation -
can you understand that?
I do. Your "interpretation" is corrupt in every way.
This is what the Holy Spirit tells me based on the plain and simple reading of the Word of God.is that what your spirit tells you? -
how do you test it?
This is what the Holy Spirit tells me based on the plain and simple reading of the Word of God.
I miss John Corapi and Francis Mary Stone.
And Benedict Groeschel.
I like John Trugilio, but I can't stand Ray Guarendi, he's obnoxious.
:idunno:
I never watch Wrestling.
That anyone includes YOUR "church" and you give "US" no reason to believe you or them.anyone can say that -
you give us no reason to believe you
That anyone includes YOUR "church" and you give "US" no reason to believe you or them.
our interpretation is based on His church built on a rock which includes the keys and the power to bind and loose
Your interpretation is wrong and in so many ways.our interpretation is based on His church built on a rock which includes the keys and the power to bind and loose
Your interpretation is wrong and in so many ways.
Your interpretation is wrong and in so many ways.
Keep trying... your propaganda will not work on me.based on what? -
the spirit you haven't tested?
Keep trying... your propaganda will not work on me.
I would mostly agree, except for one thing. The scribes and the Pharisees had a tiny bit of actual legitimacy. The RCC has NONE whatsoever.Catholics should be more like Peter.
Peter opposed the huge religious machine of his day, stepped out, and clung to a few simple truths.
Catholicism is a huge religious machine like the ones that the scribes and Pharisees had created.
Apparently you do not know what propaganda means.they are reasons and as soon as you understand what a reason is you might be able to use them