She might be lousy at what she does, I agree. But AP was one of her sources. In an article about Texas, giving Texas stats and showing, supposedly, how bad it was in Texas, saying this: "These numbers, however, provide another perspective, painting a picture of the true cost of the state's deep freeze", she says almost the same thing the AP article said, but not quite. It was enough different to show she had to think about it. She had an agenda to make Texas look bad, and it's obvious.
AP had a similar agenda. Epoch Times fell for it. Why do you think they so want Texas to look bad that they will deceitfully present data?