I'm sure someone will try it, and then appeals will go up to the SCOTUS, (if it gets that far) and there it will die.
Bet you a chocolate chip cookie.
Bet you a chocolate chip cookie.
I'm sure someone will try it, and then appeals will go up to the SCOTUS, (if it gets that far) and there it will die.
Bet you a chocolate chip cookie.
Nope. Esp if they are a church that is a 501c3.
But what does it all really mean?
I guess it means we'll all just have to live and let live and mind our own business, perhaps? :idunno:
That doesn't seem to say either way but I don't read Legal Weaselese too good.
Sounds like what the church did in Germany, when Hitler started rounding up Jews.I guess it means we'll all just have to live and let live and mind our own business, perhaps? :idunno:
Here's a case of a "couple" in the UK suing to force a church to perform their ceremony. Cases like this (win or lose) will pave the way.Way different ballpark.
Wonder if the Muslims are going to fuss about having to do this in their mosques here?Here's a case of a "couple" in the UK suing to force a church to perform their ceremony. Cases like this (win or lose) will pave the way.
Do you think I am wrong?
Wonder if the Muslims are going to fuss about having to do this in their mosques here?
Why don't you turn your attention to enforcing these OT passages: "I hate divorce, says the Lord"? Mal 2:16
"Thou shalt not commit adultery."
Yes. Different law, foundation and precedent. The only time you'll see a high court consider outside law is when there's no precedent in our own.Here's a case of a "couple" in the UK suing to force a church to perform their ceremony. Cases like this (win or lose) will pave the way.
Do you think I am wrong?