Jabez
Friend of Jesus
elohiym said:Yes.
Do you consider denying Jesus a sin?
Yes, Was Peter a saved?
elohiym said:Yes.
Do you consider denying Jesus a sin?
Turbo,Turbo said::up: Worth repeating.
elohiym said:So if we continue on sinning after we are saved then we are not saved. Isn't that what you are saying?
Not when he denied Jesus. The Bible states he was not even converted (saved) at the last supper, just prior to his denial...Jabez said:Yes, Was Peter a saved?
Okay. Using homosexuality as an example, can a homosexual be saved without stopping sinning? Then once he is saved, however that happened, can he continue to sin and still be saved?God_Is_Truth said:no, that would mean our salvation was dependent on us, instead of Christ. what i mean is that when you are saved, you should repent of your sins. but repentence is a process, not something instant.
Shimei said:Christians still sin, but Christians are not under the law. Christians are no longer sinners, but saints. Even though Christians still sin, they do not lose their salvation.
Romans 6
14 For sin shall not have dominion over you, for you are not under law but under grace.
22 But now having been set free from sin, and having become slaves of God, you have your fruit to holiness, and the end, everlasting life. 23 For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Should we continue to sin because we can?
Romans 6
15 What then? Shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? Certainly not! 16 Do you not know that to whom you present yourselves slaves to obey, you are that one’s slaves whom you obey, whether of sin leading to death, or of obedience leading to righteousness? 17 But God be thanked that though you were slaves of sin, yet you obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine to which you were delivered. 18 And having been set free from sin, you became slaves of righteousness. 19 I speak in human terms because of the weakness of your flesh. For just as you presented your members as slaves of uncleanness, and of lawlessness leading to more lawlessness, so now present your members as slaves of righteousness for holiness.
elohiym said:Okay. Using homosexuality as an example, can a homosexual be saved without stopping sinning?
Then once he is saved, however that happened, can he continue to sin and still be saved?
Yes. God does not approve of anyone that condones sin. He says to rebuke those who sin before all.Turbo said:How about approving of those who practice homosexuality? Does God consider that a sin, elohiym?
elohiym said:Okay. Using homosexuality as an example, can a homosexual be saved without stopping sinning?
Then once he is saved, however that happened, can he continue to sin and still be saved?
elohiym said:Yes. God does not approve of anyone that condones sin. He says to rebuke those who sin before all.
Do you approve of those who practice homosexuality, Turbo, and do you think they have to stop performing homosexuality to be saved?
How about after they are saved, can they start sinning again, and still be saved? :think:
God_Is_Truth said:any thoughts on this verse?
1 Timothy 5:22
Do not lay hands upon anyone too hastily and thereby share responsibility for the sins of others;
:think:
No. Sin is transgression of the law.koban said:I think where Elohiym gets hung up is on the definition of sin. In his mind (and I'm sure he'll correct me if I'm wrong) sin = guilt under the law.
So if "you don't perform sin" how are you sinning?koban said:If you take an action, say lust or envy that is prohibited under the law, and perform that action after salvation, you don't perform sin, because you're no longer under the law.
Read Romans.koban said:Where he loses me is in saying that it isn't really you anyways, it's your old sinful nature that performs the act, and it isn't you, besides, its dead anyways, so the law doesn't apply to it.
No.koban said:I know you asked Turbo, but I'm sure he'll respond too, so don't get your knickers in a wad.
Can anyone stop sinning before they're saved?
If they turn back to sin, they are not saved.koban said:...because (according to Elohiym) they can't sin after they're saved, no matter what they do.
SOTK said:Keep thyself pure seems to suggest that we can become tainted by another's sin. Does this mean we are a sinner? I don't think it does. Tainted or affected does not equate with being a sinner.
koban said:I know you asked Turbo, but I'm sure he'll respond too, so don't get your knickers in a wad.
Can anyone stop sinning before they're saved?
koban said:No, because (according to Elohiym) they can't sin after they're saved, no matter what they do.
elohiym said:No. Sin is transgression of the law.
So if "you don't perform sin" how are you sinning?
God_Is_Truth said:yes, as i said before, it's impossible to stop sinning before you are saved.
I disagree with your conclusion. A person who continues to sin in spite of grace is grieving the Holy Spirit. That is the unpardonable sin.God_Is_Truth said:yes. salvation is by grace (unearned and undeserved) through faith, not by works.
elohiym said:No.
If they turn back to sin, they are not saved.
For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, Hebrews 10:26
Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin. And the servant abideth not in the house for ever: but the Son abideth ever. John 8:34
God_Is_Truth said:no, that would mean our salvation was dependent on us, instead of Christ. what i mean is that when you are saved, you should repent of your sins. but repentence is a process, not something instant.