I'm sorry, I posted earlier that the vote was today, It's the 12 not the 5th.
I have no idea why I thought it was the 5th.
I'm not from Alabama.
:mock: fool
I'm sorry, I posted earlier that the vote was today, It's the 12 not the 5th.
I have no idea why I thought it was the 5th.
I'm not from Alabama.
Thanks for making the case for Roy Moore. Roy Moore has gone beyond the "she said-he said" defense, as he's shown that the accusers were either lying or have ulterior motives (Doug Jones supporters, etc.) to smear his impeccable reputation.
That he knew her. So when he said
“The allegations are completely false,” Moore said at a campaign event on Nov. 27.
“They are malicious. Specifically, I do not know any of these women.”
He was lying through his teeth.
“At 34 minutes and 56 seconds into the video, he says, unequivocally, I did not know any of them,” Gibson said.
“In that moment, it changed my perspective. I knew he was a liar.”
So, derf. Why did he say he didn't know her? :think:
Has any other men from that time and area said they dated teenagers too?
If part of the defense of Moore is that it was a different time, etc I'd be curious to know if anyone would stand up and say they attempted to date teenagers also. Maybe they cruised the local malls too.
Like I said, I don't know the context. Do you have a link to the actual video itself, so I can listen to it?
Notice that Gibson's "perspective" changed AFTER that video.
At a Nov. 29 rally at a church in the south Alabama town of Theodore, Moore said, "Let me state once again: I do not know any of these women, did not date any of these women and have not engaged in any sexual misconduct with anyone." |
So before the video, she must not have thought that Moore did ANYTHING WRONG. And if SHE, one of his accusers, didn't believe he did anything wrong, SHE MUST NOT HAVE BEEN ONE OF HIS ACCUSERS!
Thus, if he was saying he didn't know any of his accusers, but he knew Gibson, it provides context for his statement that he didn't know "any of these women", where "these women" is defined as those that are accusing him of wrongdoing.
This has been my argument on this thread from my first post--that there is NOTHING WRONG with a 32 year old man asking a 17 year-old woman to go out with him. Even Gibson didn't think it was wrong until he supposedly spurned her by saying he didn't know her. But before that she admits that she admired him AND STILL DID, even after she came forward to say that he dated her when she was 17.
Can YOU help me to understand what Gibson's allegation was in early November 2017, and why she still admired Moore until 27 November 2017?????????
I'm not a wholly devoted fan of anybody on this earth. Roy Moore can sin just like the worst of us, except he seems not to have been doing so most of his 70 years of life. For most of those 70 years, his reputation is impeccable, even when the whole country turned against him, and even with a majority of those that are being counted as his "accusers". You have to admit that, even if you don't agree with what he did as AL supreme court chief justice.Sure, I can post it. Before I bother, would it change your opinion or perspective if you heard it from his own mouth?
You completely ignored what I said. His concern, from what I could tell, was that some women were accusing him of sexual misconduct. He said he did not know or date any of the women that were accusing him of sexual misconduct. And yes, I wrote a whole post about the accusations, listing who was "accusing" him of what. Gibson did not accuse him of any sexual misconduct--period.Correct. He is effectively calling her a liar and she naturally took offense.
At a Nov. 29 rally at a church in the south Alabama town of Theodore, Moore said, "Let me state once again: I do not know any of these women, did not date any of these women and have not engaged in any sexual misconduct with anyone."
Do you not even know who has accused him of what?
This isn't that complicated. Gibson told her story of dating Moore when she was 17. Moore denied dating her. This then became an issue of credibility and if true, shows a pattern of Moore preferring younger girls. Now she is showing evidence that they did indeed have a bit of a relationship. If true, it further clouds his credibility by showing that if he is going to lie about dating her how is he credible when it comes to the more damaging accusations?
Which of them are Doug Jones supporters?
Because I heard that at least some of them were/are Trump supporters so it'd be strange to then also support Doug.
Unless the reason they are for Doug is because the other guy is a pervert who tried to date/assault them. Or maybe I heard incorrectly about the Trump supporter part.
You have me mistaken for some else.Why don't you get together with WizardofOz/SabbathMoon and discuss more unsubstantiated gossip, because they will be more interested in what you have to say than I am.
:mock: fool
One of Moore's accusers admits today that she wrote some of the content of the yearbook signing, including the date and location.
Yep.One of Moore's accusers admits today that she wrote some of the content of the yearbook signing, including the date and location.
I want to say it was on ABC today, I'm sure we'll see the footage. If I'm not mistaken, Bev is the one who claims she was 14, the only accuser that would be illegal for Moore. Not to mention the holes in her story of working at the diner.Yep.
Beverly Young Nelson had earlier said:"He wrote in my yearbook as follows: 'To a sweeter more beautiful girl, I could not say Merry Christmas, Christmas, 1977, Love, Roy Moore, Olde Hickory House. Roy Moore, DA,'".
Now she admits that she added some of the text, ........ but did not specify exactly how much she added.
That bolded part bothers me.
Did the person interviewing Beverly with this latest admission just not ask her to specify what she added, or did she just refuse to reveal any more specific details?
I would find it very suspect that the one interviewing did not ask her to be specific about what she added.
I would also find it suspect that Beverly would not say exactly what she added.
This just makes the accuracy of Beverly's claim even more fishy.
Beverly is not the 14 year old.I want to say it was on ABC today, I'm sure we'll see the footage. If I'm not mistaken, Bev is the one who claims she was 14, the only accuser that would be illegal for Moore. Not to mention the holes in her story of working at the diner.
Yep.
Beverly Young Nelson had earlier said:
"He wrote in my yearbook as follows: 'To a sweeter more beautiful girl, I could not say Merry Christmas, Christmas, 1977, Love, Roy Moore, Olde Hickory House. Roy Moore, DA,'".
Now she admits that she added some of the text, ........ but did not specify exactly how much she added.
That bolded part bothers me.
Did the person interviewing Beverly with this latest admission just not ask her to specify what she added, or did she just refuse to reveal any more specific details?
I would find it very suspect that the one interviewing did not ask her to be specific about what she added.
I would also find it suspect that Beverly would not say exactly what she added.
This just makes the accuracy of Beverly's claim even more fishy.
To a sweeter more beautiful girl, I could not say Merry Christmas, Christmas, 1977, Love, Roy Moore
Thanks, that settles it.http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/roy-moore-accuser-beverly-young-nelson-pray-hes/story?id=51666016
Asked by ABC News about Moore and his defenders’ saying discrepancies in the inscription would damage her credibility, Nelson said, “He wrote the note and signed his name.”
“I had wrote under it where it happened at,” she added, referring to where she said they were when she said he signed the book. “I want to make this straight."