Idolater
"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
A simple explanation of this unfamiliar acronym will enable me to provide you a simple yes or no.
Thanks.
A simple explanation of this unfamiliar acronym will enable me to provide you a simple yes or no.
A simple explanation of this unfamiliar acronym will enable me to provide you a simple yes or no.
Thanks.
I don't enjoy how you never engage this OP.
The debate is over. The Protestant view on communion is dead.
Like all the many passages that declare the altar bread and wine of the Church to be the body and blood of Christ!
And like all of the other many passages which make zero sense unless the Eucharist is the Real Presence of Christ!
I included a link. Did you look at it?
That's awesome.I included a link. Did you look at it?
The Protestant position on the Real Presence has been utterly denied, that the bread and the cup are only symbols.
This view has been logically dispatched, in the OP's linked thread.
The rhetoric however lives on, in the minds of Protestants (who hold the identical view on the matter to all nonbelievers, which is something that @Right Divider pointed out earlier in this thread).
Logically, if Jesus is real, then Orthodoxy or Catholicism are the only two options if we believe in Him.
That's awesome. I was just thinking that your post is consistent with someone who didn't actually read the debate in the OP's linked thread. Because the whole "figurative language" lie was dispatched there.Probably not.
That's awesome. I was just thinking that your post is consistent with someone who didn't actually read the debate in the OP's linked thread. Because the whole "figurative language" lie was dispatched there.
Nope. Your view, which is the same view as all Protestants, and the same view of all atheists too, was crushed in the impromptu battle royale debate in the OP's linked thread.... our position is the one that is more correct.
Nope.
Your view, which is the same view as all Protestants,
and the same view of all atheists too,
was crushed in the impromptu battle royale debate in the OP's linked thread.
(@SaulToPaul was there promoting your view.
He had no answer to @brewmama, who 'cleaned up'. It began post 115 and was over post 217. It wasn't much of a contest either, sad to say.)
I mean sad for Protestants.
That's awesome.
The Protestant position on the Real Presence has been utterly denied, that the bread and the cup are only symbols.
This view has been logically dispatched, in the OP's linked thread.
The rhetoric however lives on, in the minds of Protestants (who hold the identical view on the matter to all nonbelievers, which is something that @Right Divider pointed out earlier in this thread).
Logically, if Jesus is real, then Orthodoxy or Catholicism are the only two options if we believe in Him.
I believe it as it is explained in the Catechism.EENS (extra ecclesiam nulla salus) quite simply means outside the Church there is no salvation. Specifically, the Catholic Church alone.
You either believe that, as a small percentage of Catholics do, based on past Catholic teaching (Pope Pius XII, for example: ""By divine mandate the interpreter and guardian of the Scriptures, and the depository of Sacred Tradition living within her, the Church alone is the entrance to salvation: She alone, by herself, and under the protection and guidance of the Holy Spirit, is the source of truth.") - or you don't believe it.
Which is it?
I believe it as it is explained in the Catechism.
Which means, ironically, no.
Edit: Also, what does this have to do with the OP or thread?
That makes Catholicism and Orthodoxy the only two serious contenders for the real Church in the Bible.
That would be the Roman Catholic Church that has been so diligently covering up pedophilia for decades upon decades?... the (Roman Catholic) Church alone is the entrance to salvation ...
That would be the Roman Catholic Church that has been so diligently covering up pedophilia for decades upon decades?
Do you believe in the Real Presence of Him in the Eucharist?Then why the aggressive approach to people you should consider part of the body of Christ?
Still isn't relevant. There's precisely one valid way to be a Christian /Church pastor, and it's to be made one /appointed by an already valid pastor, the most recent link in an ancient chain that reaches back through time all the way to the hands of an Apostle.As you may remember, I was responding to this:
Red herring fallacy.That would be the Roman Catholic Church that has been so diligently covering up pedophilia for decades upon decades?
Sounds pretty retarded to me
It really isn't.Red herring fallacy.
He said she said.It really isn't.
Good thing that's not the claim in the OP then. It's that the Protestant view of the communion bread and cup was logically positively proven to be false. That leaves only the Orthodox and the yes Catholic view still standing, which means you have two options if you want to be "a New Testament Christian".Regardless of its claims, the RCC is not the church Christ founded. It was corrupted long ago.