As I've told you Darby followers over and over again, the New Covenant wasn't revealed to, or preached until after the cross (actually, not until after Pentecost)
Spam.
As I've told you Darby followers over and over again, the New Covenant wasn't revealed to, or preached until after the cross (actually, not until after Pentecost)
Why is it that you somehow think you are better than her?
You're telling everyone there's two gospels.
Why is it that you somehow think you are better than her?
You're telling everyone there's two gospels.
"as it is now revealed"-puts your "everyone knew the mystery" "theory to rest.
You're right; let's answer that. I'll go first - cause answering your questions is - oh SO! - worth ignoring - Booyah!!!
Okay, who's next answering his question, here, he did ask, lol
You mean you don't care that she is possibly still lost?
There were men who knew mysteries many years before Paul. There isn't just one mystery.
(Matt 13:11 KJV) He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.
TeT is one of those "NUTS" who believes Christ came back to earth in 70AD in the form of the Roman army! Is that silly, or what?
Should I care that you are possibly still lost?
I have that, "Rascal" TeT on permanent "eggnore!"
So, you are sure that Paul did not preach a different gospel than Peter.
If you read II Cor. 11:4-6, 13. Paul was talking about the gospel preached by the Apostles of Jesus while making a comparison with the way he preached about Jesus. The impression he had was that they were preaching about a different Jesus and refusing to accept Paul as an apostle. Probably Paul was not aware that they had already selected Matthias to replace Judas as an apostle and, he thought that it was because they could not consider him even as a disciple, let alone an apostle. Hence, Paul claimed not to be a whit behind the very "supper" apostles. (v. 5) At the end of the text in v. 13, Paul closed the discussion by considering them as false apostles.
Don't you consider this proof enough that they, Paul and the Apostles preached different gospels? Then, if you read Gal. 1:6-9 you will be convinced that's true. They did preach different gospels.
There ya go, Te tel a lie - your first student - already has his straws picked.
So, you are sure that Paul did not preach a different gospel than Peter.
Is there anyway you could convince your fellow Darby follower Johnny W to do the same as you?
Getting to ya, hunh, lol
Getting to ya, hunh, lol
That's just going to give him even more fodder to mess with you from.
Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding - Luh ay dees and gentuh men - in this corner - already down for the count before he even saw what was comin - Te tel a lie...
Not in 3D, but in 70AD, lol
Why do those who are in falseness have that certain style of writing about them?
Why is it that you somehow think you are better than her?