You're a follower of John Nelson Darby.
Spam.
You're a follower of John Nelson Darby.
]You're just another follower of Darby who can't reconcile 2 Peter 3 with your "two gospel" theory.
I believe Jesus came for a massive amount of people then.So you believe Jesus Christ's Second Coming happened in 70AD.
Do you believe that too? That is what he is saying.
If you need him to spell it out then you just prove you are incapable of the understanding you think you have.
Its why you are ever asking people what they meant about this, that, the other.
Examine that about yourself already...
What? You have said that!
You said forgiveness of sins has nothing to do with salvation.
Nope! I've never said
:doh: It's like talking to a wall...Asking to be forgiven and already forgiven all trespasses is NOT the same thing!You even went against glorydaz for saying she asked God to forgive her!
:doh: It's like talking to a wall...Asking to be forgiven and already forgiven all trespasses is NOT the same thing!
Ephesians 4:32 KJV, Colossians 2:13 KJV
I have NEVER said forgiveness of sins has nothing to do with salvation. Believing the Lord died for my sins, was buried and that God raised Him from the dead for my justification proves forgiveness and is the means by which I am saved (1 Corinthians 15: 1-4 KJV).
“Tet., what is the gospel?..............There is a chance that Tet. has been taught wrong about how we are saved. I hope he knows that Paul did not mean faith and no obey; however, I believe that at least Tet. knows that we have to obey to stay saved. HE KNOWS we have to listen to Jesus and obey. He knows there is only one gospel.”-“god”’suntruth
Whataya say, Craigie Tet.? Your fellow “saved” buddy asked you a question. Speak up, man pleaser.
Go reread and study harder what I wrote.I am not doing what you accuse me of doing.
I am saved and will not lose my salvation. However, we must warn others that they must remain in Jesus' love.
Go reread and study harder what I wrote.
What a bad misunderstanding about me you have.You are merely acting as a mocker.
Oh yes Jesus did.
You are already not speaking the truth about him. You falsely accused him of being a man pleaser.
You are merely acting as a mocker.
What a bad misunderstanding about me you have.
As usual you pervert what Paul said. Here are his exact words:
"I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed" (Gal.1:6-8).
Paul does not say that there is only one gospel.
He knew that there were two gospels and he also knew that those preaching the other gospel would not be preaching that gospel to the Gentiles:
So there is nothing written at Galatians 1:6-8 that proves that only one gospel was preached during the Acts period.
In the same chapter Paul speaks of the gospel which he preached to those in the churches which he founded and he says that he received that gospel from the Lord Jesus for the express purpose to preach it among the Gentiles:
We can understand that the gospel of which Paul is speaking is strictly for the Gentiles by his remarks later in the same epistle:
If there were only "one" gospel then there would be absolutely no reason to specify that the gospel that he is speaking of is the one "which I preach among the Gentiles."
If the gospel he preached among the Gentiles was the same gospel which he preached among the Jews then why would he need to go to Jerusalem in order to consider its relationship to the gospel which he had preached earlier in the company of some of the Apostles (Acts 9:27-29)? Of course there would be no reason for him to do that if the gospel which he earlier preached with other apostles was the same one that he was preaching to the Gentiles.
Spam. Her "Hail Mary."