Proof that Paul didn't preach a different gospel than Peter
- Thread starter tetelestai
- Start date
No.
(Rev 21:22) I did not see a temple in the city, because the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple.
Now, do you want to try answering the question?
Here it is again:
Do you believe the physical body of each believer is a temple for the Holy Spirit?
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Doesn't work that way. I was talking to GT about the kingdom of heaven, and you want to slide in a side topic to distract from the fact she said something completely stupid.
God's Truth
New member
When a person is saved, they have the kingdom of heaven within them.
1 Corinthians 6:17 But whoever is united with the Lord is one with him in spirit.
John 6:56Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in him.
Ephesians 2:6 And God raised us up with Christ and seated us with him in the heavenly realms in Christ Jesus,
Colossians 3:1 Since, then, you have been raised with Christ, set your hearts on things above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God.
Colossians 3:3 For you died, and your life is now hidden with Christ in God.
Colossians 1:13 For he has rescued us from the dominion of darkness and brought us into the kingdom of the Son he loves,
Romans 8:9 You, however, are not in the realm of the flesh but are in the realm of the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God lives in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, they do not belong to Christ.
God's Truth
New member
Please answer tetelestai.
Do you believe the saved are the temple of the Holy Spirit?
Shasta
Well-known member
I read through this lengthy thread though I saw many proclamations, many elaborate expositions of MAD and rather too much acrimony, I have yet to see anyone who believes in dual gospels reconcile Gal. 1:8 and 1 Peter 1:1 which you brought up. Why haveso many apparently creative people not applied their collective exegetical abilities to solve this problem?
The question pertains to what the two of you are discussing.
Why are you always so afraid of questions?
Wow, Craigie! How long did it take you to come up with that "show stopper?"
Clown. Sit down. You're an embarrassment to this site
They keep ignoring it because they know it completely destroys their "two gospel" theory.
It's why they keep ignoring it over and over again.
I brought it up in heir's "two gospel" thread, and it upset her so much, she closed the thread.
I believe those who are saved are indwelt with the Holy Spirit, and the physical bodies of each believer are temples that the Holy Spirit dwells in.
STP's problem is that he takes everything literal, and in doing so, has no understanding of anything spiritual.
God's Truth
New member
I wish he would answer your question.
I am wondering if his beliefs speak against each saved person receiving the Holy Spirit.
I am preparing myself to hear something new about his beliefs that goes against the scriptures.
Right - for according to you and yours, the Lord "spiritually" returned in 70AD, as the Roman Army against Jerusalem.
STP's, heir's "problem" is they are tired of "answer a fool according to his folly."
You well know you are just baiting them into your nonsense.
Vs. your "Judas preached there is only one piece of good news in the book" theory?
You realize, do you not, that con artist Preterist Tet., asserts that his saint Judas preached the good news of 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV, do you not? Go ahead-ask him.
His "nonsense," clown act:
“And that is what happened. The Lord came in a way that everyone could see Him. However, He never touched planet earth, and when this event was over, He then sat on the throne in Heaven NOT on planet earth.”-Tet.
"Everyone" that saw Him, according to Craigie, was Josephus, and Wikipedia. Wait....
Vs.
"Tet is a preterist that believes Christ already returned in 70 AD via the Roman Army."-Tambora, on another TOL thread
"Correct, and thanks for making it clear that it was the Roman army that was His return."-Gomer Craigie
"The Roman army destroyed Jerusalem in 70AD. That is what Jesus meant when He said He will return."-Gomer Tet.
Shazam, Gomer Tet.
Once again, we see another MADist who has no answer for 2 Peter 3.
Yet another MADist who has no answer for 2 Peter 3, or the OP of this thread.
To date, not one MADist who claims there were "two gospels" can explain 2 Peter 3.
As soon as you explain one of the 666 lies that you've spread on TOL, such as this lie, which we caught you on:
“And that is what happened. The Lord came in a way that everyone could see Him. However, He never touched planet earth, and when this event was over, He then sat on the throne in Heaven NOT on planet earth.”-Tet.
"Everyone" that saw Him, according to Craigie, was Josephus, and Wikipedia. Wait....
Vs.
"Tet is a preterist that believes Christ already returned in 70 AD via the Roman Army."-Tambora, on another TOL thread
"Correct, and thanks for making it clear that it was the Roman army that was His return."-Gomer Craigie
"The Roman army destroyed Jerusalem in 70AD. That is what Jesus meant when He said He will return."-Gomer Tet.
"which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Holy Spirit sent down from heaven."
You have a typo, there, brother - its 1 Peter 1:10-12.
It happens.
Anyway, that is not Paul's Mystery - rather, that is this - Hebrews 2:
3. How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him;
4. God also bearing them witness, both with signs and wonders, and with divers miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost, according to his own will?
5. For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak.