Feel free to provide a direct quote of me lying
Offensive (?) video
- Thread starter musterion
- Start date
Feel free to provide a direct quote of me lying
Ive already done that today with the muslim bakery post, when you said they dont bake cakes and cakes are clearly shown in the video that they baked.
See this post: http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...never-answer&p=5028195&viewfull=1#post5028195
In jester's defense, I've never seen such a quote from him.
Check doser quotes though. This sounds like something he would say.
As for the vid:
No, funny actually.
glassjester
Well-known member
I don't. Try again.
no, all you did was demonstrate that you just aren't very bright. Crowder went to 14 bakeries including the Golden Bakery on Warren Avenue which only bakes bread.
the random image from the video that YouTube displays is from Dearborn Sweets (its a different bakery)
I get it - it's not gay bashing when YOU do it.
glassjester
Well-known member
Ok, brother. :idunno:
Nazis are an abomination. So you won't be an abomination. It's ok if others are an abomination. It's their choice.
Last edited:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Yes, they were, just like you are when you advocate senseless violence in the aims of whatever, like beatings etc. I would point out the irony, but then you'd need a few more IQ points to appreciate it...
glassjester
Well-known member
Being of a certain political view is an abomination? Chapter and verse, please.
Behavior is an abomination. And moving past your strawman.....You claimed it is in fact ok to engage in sodomy and other sexually perverted behavior. If he doesn't like it, then just he shouldn't do it. And I showed you the same thought process with the second worse socialists.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Careful GJ, he'll be advocating that you deserve a good beating next...
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
glassjester
Well-known member
I certainly didn't.
True. He shouldn't. Do you disagree? Do you think he should do it?
You based your silly little "argument" on a false premise. I never said it was "ok" to engage in homosexual activity. I simply asked about the purpose of "bashing" homosexuals.
glassjester
Well-known member
Good thing his words are false and meaningless.
You did. You did again in this post right here.
You say he should not judge homos, which makes them think their behavior is ok. You judge him and then tell him to not judge. You are quite the retard.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
The guy, is quite frankly, embarrassingly thick...
glassjester
Well-known member
Nope. You're imagining things.
Perhaps you and I have different definitions of "bashing."
Care to offer one?
glassjester
Well-known member
Maybe. It seems like he's just looking for an argument. Looking too hard, really.