Obama nominates child molesting homo for Secretary of the Army

[ok doser]

:nono:
The burden of proof is on the accuser.

right

and anna and cabinetmaker are accusing nick of lying without being able to prove it

 

[ok doser]

I find it amusing that the bananahead hasn't accused pj of lying with this thread title:

http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?115344-Cosby-Is-a-Serial-Rapist


unsurprisingly, she's willing to believe, without proof, that a man is a rapist

but not that a homosexual is a child molester :chuckle:

 

[ok doser]

Are any of those 15/16 threads left?

here

you can make your own

http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/181988030425?lpid=82&chn=ps&ul_noapp=true

 

[ok doser]

Child molester? Another lie by Nick ....

prove it

 

[WizardofOz]

prove it

Can you prove that Nick M is not a child molester?

 

[Rusha]

Are any of those 15/16 threads left?

I don't believe they are. Interesting, eh?

 

[Ktoyou]

Wow, is that how the American legal system works nowadays? The burden of proof is on the accused to establish their innocence lest they be presumed guilty, rumours included? Funny, thought it was kinda the other way around.

SOD, you're a wife beater.

Prove you aren't.

:thumb:

Yes. If you drive through a light with a camera and as you move though, it changes to red. you get a ticket in the mail. If you believe you are innocent, you have to prove it. Most travelers pay it, since it is out of town.

 

[rexlunae]

no it isn't

nick might have made his claim, as you believe, without a shred of evidence to support it

I far more reason to believe that Nick is lying than he has to believe that Fanning is a pedophile.

if what he claims is true, he's not lying

Yeah, but it's not. And he has no reason to think it is.

that's because Robertson isn't a pedophile :idunno:

No, he just believes in marrying children, and says so.

 

[rexlunae]

I find it amusing that the bananahead hasn't accused pj of lying with this thread title:

http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?115344-Cosby-Is-a-Serial-Rapist


unsurprisingly, she's willing to believe, without proof, that a man is a rapist

but not that a homosexual is a child molester :chuckle:

Not "proof", yet, according to the standard of legal proof. There's a fair amount of evidence, though. There's no evidence for what Nick said.

 

[intojoy]

Yea but they've been together for ten years woman!


Sent from my iPhone using TOL

 

[glorydaz]

Well, yes.



If you actually had any real evidence you would be all over the news proving to the world how all homosexuals are pedophiles and making sure Fanning is prosecuted for his crimes. You are not doing that. That leaves two possible options: a) you have no evidence, b) you are deeply morally bankrupt person. Which is it?

Ah yes....real evidence. How many child molesters leave "real evidence" behind?

Fortunately, most people see the signs and don't wait for the "real evidence" before they make a judgment. It's a matter of common sense. Where there is smoke, there is fire.

 

[WizardofOz]

Real evidence? How about any evidence?

 

[glorydaz]

I find it amusing that the bananahead hasn't accused pj of lying with this thread title:

http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?115344-Cosby-Is-a-Serial-Rapist


unsurprisingly, she's willing to believe, without proof, that a man is a rapist

but not that a homosexual is a child molester :chuckle:

That's just what I was thinking. If this man was straight, she'd immediately think he was a rapist or she'd be claiming his date was too young.

 

[glorydaz]

Real evidence? How about any evidence?

Just ask gay men how young they were when they were gotten to...it comes with the territory.

 

[WizardofOz]

Just ask gay men how young they were when they were gotten to...it comes with the territory.

Ah. Being gay is evidence for being a child molester.

So still no evidence then.

This entire thread is a big fail

 

[CabinetMaker]

Ah yes....real evidence. How many child molesters leave "real evidence" behind?

Fortunately, most people see the signs and don't wait for the "real evidence" before they make a judgment. It's a matter of common sense. Where there is smoke, there is fire.

What signs? Podophiles take where they can be close to children. He is nominated for Secretary of the Army. What signs do you see that makes you think he stocks children for sex?

Sent from my SM-G900T using TheologyOnline mobile app

 

[intojoy]

What signs? Podophiles take where they can be close to children. He is nominated for Secretary of the Army. What signs do you see that makes you think he stocks children for sex?

Sent from my SM-G900T using TheologyOnline mobile app

Come on cabinet breaker! You can see it in the eyes bro


Sent from my iPhone using TOL

 

[CabinetMaker]

Come on cabinet breaker! You can see it in the eyes bro


Sent from my iPhone using TOL

And you consider that convincing evidence? I shutter to think what you would do to your wife is she got a look in her eyes when she saw a handsome man walking down the street.

Sent from my SM-G900T using TheologyOnline mobile app

 

[Rusha]

Ah. Being gay is evidence for being a child molester.

So still no evidence then.

This entire thread is a big fail

That it is ...

 

[intojoy]

And you consider that convincing evidence? I shutter to think what you would do to your wife is she got a look in her eyes when she saw a handsome man walking down the street.

Sent from my SM-G900T using TheologyOnline mobile app

So now you're handsome CB?


Sent from my iPhone using TOL