You like MiloOh the irony:
Reported Post by ok doser
Started by*Grandma Lucy,*January 29th, 2017*04:04 PM
Reported Post by ok doser
Started by*Grandma Lucy,*January 29th, 2017*04:00 PM
Reported Post by ok doser
Started by*Grandma Lucy,*January 29th, 2017*03:36 PM
Reported Post by ok doser
Started by*Grandma Lucy,*January 29th, 2017*03:35 PM
Etc. etc. etc.
And no, aCW isn't a fan of this kind of speech:
https://i.stack.imgur.com/ofmZq.jpg
Fighting words.
Only if you were educated by wolves. In which case the appropriate term is "Grrrrrrrrrrrrrooooowwwwwwrrrrr."
lain:With thanks to the Southern Poverty Law Center
Fighting words.
Only if you were educated by wolves. In which case the appropriate term is "Grrrrrrrrrrrrrooooowwwwwwrrrrr."
With thanks to the Southern Poverty Law Center
The Alternative Right is a term coined in 2008 byRichard Bertrand Spencer, who heads the white nationalist think tank known as the National Policy Institute, to describe a loose set of far-right ideals centered on “white identity” and the preservation of “Western civilization.”
The Alt-Right is intimately connected to American Identitarianism, a version of an ideology popular in Europe that emphasizes cultural and racial homogeneity within different countries...
Among the proponents of the alt right movement is Andrew Anglin, whose neo-nazi Daily Stormer website is described by Anglin as "the most visited alt right web site" going.
Richard Spencer, who founded the movement, also heads the alt-right think tank (to use the word liberally, which has to hurt) the National Policy Institute.
“Martin Luther King Jr., a fraud and degenerate in his life, has become the symbol and cynosure of White Dispossession and the deconstruction of Occidental civilization. We must overcome!" —National Policy Institute column, January 2014
“Immigration is a kind a proxy war—and maybe a last stand—for White Americans, who are undergoing a painful recognition that, unless dramatic action is taken, their grandchildren will live in a country that is alien and hostile.” —National Policy Institute column, February 2014
Others of note include Matt Heimbach, leader of the Traditionalists Youth Network.
“This is our home and our kith and kin. Borders matter, identity matters, blood matters, libertarians and their capitalism can move to Somalia if they want to live without rules, in the West we must have standards and enforce them. The ‘freedom’ for other races to move freely into white nations is nonexistent. Stay in your own nations, we don’t want you here.”—Matthew Heimbach, “I Hate Freedom,” Traditionalist Youth Network, July 7, 2013
And there's Greg Johnson...
“Since we are fighting for nothing less than the biological survival of our race, and since the vast bulk of Jews oppose us..." --—Greg Johnson, “White Nationalism & Jewish Nationalism,” August 2011
"This is why the Alt Right brand was so valuable to White Nationalists...Indeed, the original Alternative White Webzine was created as a tool of the White Nationalist entryism and conversion, and the Alt Right continued to function that way long after it became simply a generic term for edgy alternatives to conservatism." Greg Johnson, "White Nationalism, the Alt Right, and the Alt Light,"
Why the thumbs up?
That's a declaration in lieu of substantiation. It should only impress people who are easily misled.
Not reasonably, no. That's why there's a standard of reasonableness attached.
It's reasonable mitigation. It's not that there's no freedom to speak, it's that speech doesn't always pass consequence for its utterance singularly to the listener.
Which emphasizes another problem, assumption. For me the comments actually were below this one, given my settings have the newest above the oldest moving toward the top of the page. In any event, the sparse declarations failed to demonstrate any substantive opposition to my quoting the captains of the Alt Right or my point. So...good luck with that newspaper.
So a conservative internet site asks if the Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate group because it notes certain organizations claiming various related affiliations as promoting negative agendas? Wait, no, not really. It labeled one anti-gay, for its...wait for it...anti-gay rhetoric. The article calls that a technical correction. It's mostly a factual one.
Do you support the use of physical violence against people who you deem to be using hate speech?
