Originally posted by firechyld
This is something that really scares me about Christians like you. You imply that, without your faith and without Biblical teaching, you'd be a savage, a horrible and violent and "evil" person.
I don't base my life on the Bible. But I'm not a horrible, violent, evil person. The idea that Christianity is the only thing stopping you from becoming a monster says quite a lot about you... not so much about Christianity.
I think you miss the point. What they mean is that without their faith and the teachings of the Bible and a Church to guide them that they could be an adulterer or a homosexual in America, and would condone abortion for others at the very least. Of course these are legal and are not generally considered horrible, violent or evil at the present time. They could also worship Satan, or any number of false gods. They could blaspheme the name of God with virtual impunity in most settings.
Since several of these sins are against the ten commandments, and- or required the death penalty in the assembly of theocratic Israel, I don't see that one could be much worse; except by a matter of degree? Since I used to practice some of these sins before my conversion, the statement makes perfect sense to me.
Since many people practice these things today without the smallest twinge of guilt, the statment makes no sense to them. Yet the typical non believer routinely breaks most of the ten commandments and consider, themselves more righteous by degree then the average Christian.
The truly bizarre statement is the one that granite, and other former believers have made. {Paraphrased} "Now that I am no longer a believer, I am a better Christian in many ways."
How can that possibly be??????
It would be like saying, I used to be a terrible Boy Scout, but when I quit believing in the highest ideals of the Scouts and broke some of the oath and pledges, I became a better scout. Maybe so, but you never were, nor ever could be better than any scout who continued to believe and kept the oath and pledges as best as he could.
If Christianity is a total farce as someone like granite might now maintain,
one must not use Christians as a conveniant whipping boy, if you were one, and not a very good one, by your own admission.
If faith without works is useless, and if even the demons believe and tremble, how much more useless is it to say that one does not even have the faith of a demon, but has better works than a Christian? Works without faith is totally meaningless in a Christian perspective.
Likewise for a Christian to say that he would be a terrible "person" as an atheist, is far more understandable than sayng I am a better Christian as an atheist. It is a non -sequitor.
You may be a better person in society, as an atheist, but it is impossible to be a better Christian as an atheist, by ignoring the first four commanments concerning God, and practicing the next six, concerning man, slightly less imperfectly than before.