drbrumley
Well-known member
I'm trying not to be personal about this.
I know.
You framed your question in terms of violence, as if someone has to die or be hurt to justify government involvement.
I did and continue to. I believe in the non aggression principle. I don't make exceptions to the golden rule and provide no moral loophole, no double standard, for government.
Is it not reasonable for the state to protect society from the horrors of families torn apart by adultery and lives destroyed by homos? (There's actually a powerful case for the physical harm brought on us by the fags.)
The state should protect our rights, but it cannot develop our character.