Mt 15:8
my thoughts re KY clerk Davis.. no bail!
- Thread starter republicanchick
- Start date
Mt 15:8
republicanchick
New member
maybe in her religion homosexuality is worse than divorce... Most people tend to feel that way
bottom line:
She has a right to her religion
_
republicanchick
New member
"They draw close to Me with their mouths but their hearts are far from Me"
(in the Bible, can't recall where)
(in the Bible, can't recall where)
Her history is irrelevant. There are often innocent parties in divorce. Today she has moral clarity and does her part to defend marriage (Heb 13:4, Ro 14:12).
Recommended reading:
'Til Faith Do Us Part: How Interfaith Marriage is Transforming America by Naomi Schaefer Riley
Divorce & Remarriage: A Position Paper by John Piper
republicanchick
New member
yes, it is pretty difficult to change the past
can it be done?
:think::crackup:
can it be done?
:think::crackup:
:chuckle: ..that's rich
Why do you think we saddled up to begin with? We prefer arguing eye-to-eye. :idea:
shagster01
New member
She absolutely does. And if her religion is at odds with the state, then she should not work for the state. It's not that hard to figure out, is it?
One's life can be made new (Ga 6:15) but he still lives with the consequences of his sin (2 Sa 12:14-31).
"Sin will take you farther than you ever expected to go; it will keep you longer than you ever intended to stay, and it will cost you more than you ever expected to pay." ~ Deeper Still Event Series
The Berean
Well-known member
How would she know if a couple applying for a marriage license had committed adultery or fornication? :idunno: Would she have to ask them or investigate them? With a homosexual couple it's obvious they are homosexual.
She is sitting in jail to defend marriage. What have you done to defend marriage? Heb 13:4
IF it were truly about not wishing to have her signature endorse sin, she would have asked.
OR ... what if it were a heterosexual couple applying for a license and the woman was very much pregnant?
How would she not be endorsing their premarital sex? She is not being consistent.
Personally, I don't believe she should be fined or serve a day in jail, however, she should definitely lose her job.
What have you done to defend marriage? Heb 13:4
Last edited:
yeah, you're right about the consistency things. and getting fired/terminated is a no brainer. she can be fired for multiple infractions: performance of duties is just one. in MO it's a fire at will state, they don't need a reason.
yes, what about pre-marital or previously divorced folks re-marrying. what about divorces period, did she sign off on those ? maybe a different clerk -
she deserves jail if she knew the consequences. her actions and stance do nothing for her standing with God. this incident means nothing to God
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rusha
IF it were truly about not wishing to have her signature endorse sin, she would have asked.
OR ... what if it were a heterosexual couple applying for a license and the woman was very much pregnant?
How would she not be endorsing their premarital sex? She is not being consistent.
Personally, I don't believe she should be fined or serve a day in jail, however, she should definitely lose her job.
(But patrick jane's constant defense of homosexuality does mean something to God).
I didn't know that publicly elected officials could be "fired". Tell us how the "firing" process works.
Originally Posted by Rusha
IF it were truly about not wishing to have her signature endorse sin, she would have asked.
OR ... what if it were a heterosexual couple applying for a license and the woman was very much pregnant?
How would she not be endorsing their premarital sex? She is not being consistent.
Personally, I don't believe she should be fined or serve a day in jail, however, she should definitely lose her job.
(But patrick jane's constant defense of homosexuality does mean something to God).
I didn't know that publicly elected officials could be "fired". Tell us how the "firing" process works.
Interesting that they can't just find a way to throw her out of her job. Why throw her in jail? :idunno:
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Apparently she's an elected official and can only be removed by an impeachment process
I'll bet she's in a union! :sibbie:
If she is not doing her job according to the courts how hard could it be to impeach her?
The bottom line is that being a homo is wrong. It's bad for society, but especially bad for the homos themselves. So one should not endorse the lifestyle by allowing them to pretend like they can be part of society.
As for marrying people that are fornicators... marrying does not necessarily make the problem worse for the couple, and can possibly help matters (and society).
As for marrying people that are fornicators... marrying does not necessarily make the problem worse for the couple, and can possibly help matters (and society).
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
:first: