More leftist hypocrisy, nicely illustrated

[ok doser]

Lying, or drunk. Which is it?

it's friday night!


can't i do both? :banana:

 

[john w]

Scientific Fact or Principle Bible reference / Date of discovery by man

Air has weight Job 28:25 16th Century
The Earth is round Isaiah 40:22 15th Century
Oceans have natural paths in them Psalms 8:8 1854
Both man and woman possess the seed of life Genesis 3:15 17th Century
There is a place void of stars in the North Job 26:7 19th Century
Earth is held in place by invisible forces Job 26:7 1650
Taxonomic classification of matter Genesis 1 1735
Certain animals carry diseases harmful to man Leviticus 11 16th Century
Early diagnosis of leprosy Leviticus 13 17th Century
Quarantine for disease control Leviticus 13 17th Century
Blood of animals carries diseases Leviticus 17 17th Century
Blood is necessary for life Leviticus 17:11 19th Century
Earth was in nebular form initially Genesis 1:2 1911
Most seaworthy ship design ratio is 30:5:3 Genesis 6 1860
Light is a particle and has mass (a photon) Job 38:19 1932
Radio astronomy (stars give off signals) Job 38:7 1945
Oceans contain fresh water springs Job 38:16 1920
Snow has material value Job 38:22 1905, 1966
Infinite number of stars exist Genesis 15:5 1940
Dust is important to survival Isaiah 40:12 1935
Hubert Spencer's scientific principles Genesis 1 1820
Light can be split up into component colors Job 38:24 1650
Matter is made up of invisible particles Romans 1:20 20th Century
Plants use sunlight to manufacture food Job 8:16 1920
Arcturus and other stars move through space Job 38:32 19th Century
Water cycle Ecclesiastes 1:7 17th Century
Life originated in the sea Genesis 1 19th Century
Lightning and thunder are related Job 38:25 19th Century
Human beings were the last living things created Genesis 1 15th Century



Credit: John N. Clayton

 

[Greg Jennings]

Lying, or drunk. Which is it?

Lie. I thought I could refrain from the entertainment of your posts. I was wrong. I guess that's a lie in your book

 

[Greg Jennings]

Link proving you exist.

I'm not a famous historical figure. At least not to most. Maybe my forum presence has a greater effect on you

 

[Greg Jennings]

Slower-the bible is true, has been proven to be true, despite objections from droids like you.


You hate that.


Too bad.

Except for a woman can't turn to salt, the Earth is not 6000 years old, snakes can't come from sticks or talk to people, people can't live for hundreds of years.......


Need I really continue?

 

[Greg Jennings]

Yes, it does, habitual liar.

Then post the link, you (actual) habitual liar

 

[Greg Jennings]

they're a starting point





a miraculous event, where the Lord rained down burning sulfur

so we got plenty of calcium, phosphorous, sulfur - all in a nitrogen/oxygen environment with plenty of available carbon and trace elements

I will consider this. I think you've come up with something that's actually reasonable.

 

[Greg Jennings]

Tell us how the universe was created, and how a computer can work.

Answered, and unrelated/I don't have a clue

Prove the earth is "fill in the blank" years old.

Zircon dating. Here's a link: http://www.tulane.edu/~sanelson/eens211/radiometric_dating.htm

You: God can created the universe, raise the dead....but not turn a woman to salt.

I'm agnostic when it comes to whether God does or does not exist. I follow the evidence wherever it hay lead. And it DOESN'T lead to many of the conclusions stated in the Bible

You cannot be this stupid.

You can only imagine what scientists say about you :chuckle:

 

[Crucible]

Is that you, [MENTION=1851]john w[/MENTION]ayne? Is this me?

 

[MrDante]

yes, and the example you gave is insufficient for the task

do you have additional examples?

If you aren't smart enough to understand one example what would a dozen more do for you?

 

[MrDante]

Childish response. I would expect nothing less from you.

A response devoid of reasoning or even a glimmering of understanding of the topic. It's the best anyone could expect of you.

 

[MrDante]

But the Leftists would gladly "force" a woman to keep feeding her 3-year-old. Isn't that a trespass against the mother's bodily autonomy?

What if mommy wants her body to go to Aruba for a month?
Would the Leftist "force" the mother to keep her body at home and care for her toddler?

It's her body, isn't it her choice what she does with her body?

This isn't even a good strawman.

 

[ok doser]

The things that qualify as life for a human being are absent at conception....

and those would be?

a functioning brain for example.

(doser attempts to get traci to expand on his "those things that qualify as life")

(traci, unable or unwilling to, resorts to insults and evasions)

If you aren't smart enough to understand one example what would a dozen more do for you?

again, and patiently....

i understand your example

do you understand that it is not sufficient for what was asked?

you seem to think that there are "things that qualify as life"

can you give me more than one example?

 

[john w]

Answered, and unrelated/I don't have a clue

No, you punted, as usual.

Zircon dating. Here's a link

Speculation-you punted.

I'm agnostic when it comes to whether God does or does not exist. I follow the evidence wherever it hay lead. And it DOESN'T lead to many of the conclusions stated in the Bible

How do you "know" that?

Self refuting "argument."


Sit.


Prove that you exist.


Not a peep.

 

[john w]

Then post the link, you (actual) habitual liar

Nice imitate me-your daddy the devil, the great imitator, taught you well.

 

[john w]

Lie. I thought I could refrain from the entertainment of your posts. I was wrong. I guess that's a lie in your book

Habitual liar...

The bigger point beyond THAT is that you believe in impossible things simply because an old book tells you so....4000 year old manuscript

Vs.

Veracity is independent of age.

 

[Greg Jennings]

Nice imitate me-your daddy the devil, the great imitator, taught you well.

Your superstitious nature undermines your attempts at sounding smart pretty substantially, friend

 

[Greg Jennings]

Habitual liar...



Vs.

Been explained to you already why the bible isn't inerrant (snakes don't come from sticks.....etc).

Much like some others on this site (though not usually on this part of the forum) you seem to think that by asserting I haven't answered you, that means I actually haven't answered you. But much like in the real world, your personal beliefs hold little value

 

[Greg Jennings]

No, you punted, as usual.



Speculation-you punted.



How do you "know" that?

Self refuting "argument."


Sit.


Prove that you exist.


Not a peep.

Just ignore everything that contradicts the bible. Just bury that head in the sand a little deeper. You either didn't read or couldn't understand the link I gave you about zircon, yet you act like you have a clue :rotfl:


You're a fool. I enjoy conversing with fools, though. So you're in luck

 

[john w]

Your superstitious nature undermines your attempts at sounding smart pretty substantially, friend

"friend," you quip?

Negative-I don't associate with devil kids, who habitually lie, taught by the father of all lies, daddy devil....

The bigger point beyond THAT is that you believe in impossible things simply because an old book tells you so....4000 year old manuscript..

Vs.

Veracity is independent of age.