You showed no such thing. This is the problem with proof texting. You can make the text agree with anything that you want to bring to it. Reading the Bible without reading anything INTO it is the most difficult thing about theology, by far. The point of the passage is the opposite of that which you claim. Without the temple, with that separation, that veil which was torn from top to bottom, there is no longer a need for a Gentile to become a Jew in order to be near to God because "He Himself is our peace, who has made both one, and has broken down the middle wall of separation, having abolished in His flesh the enmity, that is,
the law of commandments contained in ordinances, so as to create in Himself one new man from the two, thus making peace, and that He might reconcile them both to God in one body through the cross, thereby putting to death the enmity. And He came and preached peace to you who were afar off and to those who were near. For through Him we both have access by one Spirit to the Father."
Don't you see it? It isn't that the Judaism (i.e. the Law) has been preserved, its that its been abolished!! But "the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable" (Romans 11:29) and so those saved under the Dispensation of the Kingdom remained under that dispensation and are still under that dispensation and forever will be. Thus "when they (the Twelve) saw that the gospel for the uncircumcised had been committed to me (Paul), as the gospel for the circumcised was to Peter (for He who worked effectively in Peter for the apostleship to the circumcised also worked effectively in me toward the Gentiles), and when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that had been given to me, they gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship, that we should go to the Gentiles and they to the circumcised." (Galatians 2:7-9). So, those things written by Paul applied to the Gentiles at the time (and now to everyone) and those thing written to Kingdom believers (i.e. Hebrews - Revelation) applied to Kingdom believers at the time and will apply to Kingdom believers during the Millennial Reign of Christ when He returns to Israel.
Romans 11:24 For if you were cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and were grafted contrary to nature into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these, who are natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree?
25 For I do not desire, brethren, that you should be ignorant of this mystery, lest you should be wise in your own opinion, that blindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. 26 And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written:
“The Deliverer will come out of Zion,
And He will turn away ungodliness from Jacob;
27 For this is My covenant with them,
When I take away their sins.”
28 Concerning the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but concerning the election they are beloved for the sake of the fathers. 29 For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable. 30 For as you were once disobedient to God, yet have now obtained mercy through their disobedience, 31 even so these also have now been disobedient, that through the mercy shown you they also may obtain mercy. 32 For God has committed them all to disobedience, that He might have mercy on all.
So then,I have just one question for you that you will not answer...
WHY PAUL?
If things just kept right on going "without interruption" since Pentecost, then why Paul? God had 12 Apostles, all of whom received the Holy Spirit on Pentecost (Acts 1:23 - 2:4). Where's the need for Paul?
There's several other questions that you can't answer based on your theological position but since I seriously doubt you'll even attempt to answer this one with anything but hemming and hawing or personal opinion, I'll hold those for later, in case you surprise me.
So anyone who can't read your mind and intuitively understand and come to agreement with you without any effort on your part surely must not be saved at all.
You're a lunatic.
You don't know me at all. You have no idea what I believe or why I believe it. You've never one time ever seen me try to support a single claim I've ever made on the basis of who taught it to me.
And you learned from someone too, you mindless lunatic.
Romans 10:14 How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher?
Interesting that you say such a thing. The Law is the continuation of, the fruit of, Adam's partaking of the "wrong tree" in the garden of God...
The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil
1. The Tree is the ministry of death. Gen 2:17
2. Do not partake of the Tree. Gen. 2:17
3. In the day you partake of the Tree, you will die. Gen. 2:17
4. By the Tree is the knowledge of sin. Gen. 3:22
5. The Tree brought the offense. Rom. 5:17
6. The Tree’s curse died on the cross. Rom 5:18-19
7. The Tree of Life is in the new heaven, but not the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Ezek. 31:15; Rev. 22:14
The Law
1. The law is the ministry of death. 2 Cor. 3:7
2. Do not partake of the law. Rom. 7:6; 10:4
3. In the day you partake of the law, you will die. Rom. 7:9
4. By the law is the knowledge of sin. Rom. 3:20; 7:7
5. The law made the offense abound. Rom. 5:20
6. The law was nailed to the cross. Col. 2:13-14, 16
7. The Law of the Spirit is in the new heaven, but not the Law of Death. Rom. 8:2; 7:6
Resting in Him,
Clete