Truster, I know this is hard for you, but please do try to stay on topic. We're talking about the potential murder of an innocent child.
Just for once in your pitiful existance look beyond second cause to the First Cause.
Truster, I know this is hard for you, but please do try to stay on topic. We're talking about the potential murder of an innocent child.
Your PUBLIC celebration of salvation is the prime example of your self righteousness
Yet you doubt everyone else's salvation. Stay on thread topicMy celebration is according to scripture and is in my Saviour my King and His Rest.
Yet you doubt everyone else's salvation. Stay on thread topic
Just for once in your pitiful existence look beyond your self-righteousness and piousness and have some compassion for a child who is about to be murdered because his only crime is that he's terminally ill.Just for once in your pitiful existance look beyond second cause to the First Cause.
Just for once in your pitiful existence look beyond your self-righteousness and piousness and have some compassion for a child who is about to be murdered because his only crime is that he's terminally ill.
You think what is happening is just? What is little innocent Charlie being judged for? Living? Being terminally ill? What?I have compassion, but I have no need to shout it from the roof tops. Every second 1.8 people leave time and enter eternity. This is justice and judgement at work.
The UK hospital where Charlie is has announced that they have received new evidence of treatments from Rome and the US. They want another hearing
The UK hospital where Charlie is has announced that they have received new evidence of treatments from Rome and the US. They want another hearing
I haven't heard, but the parents were given 48 hours to produce evidence that experimental treatment would benefit.Any reports on what the new evidence is?
I haven't heard, but the parents were given 48 hours to produce evidence that experimental treatment would benefit.
:thumb:It is irrelevant, what is relevant is that a government feels so inclined to interfere with the wishes of the parents & the life of a child. If the child dies after all experimental treatments which are being offered fails than so be it but, for a government to lord over the decision for this child to receive the treatment is criminal. This is what government run healthcare looks like, and that is why I reject it in total. :down:
It is irrelevant, what is relevant is that a government feels so inclined to interfere with the wishes of the parents & the life of a child. If the child dies after all experimental treatments which are being offered fails than so be it but, for a government to lord over the decision for this child to receive the treatment is criminal. This is what government run healthcare looks like, and that is why I reject it in total. :down:
It is irrelevant, what is relevant is that a government feels so inclined to interfere with the wishes of the parents & the life of a child. If the child dies after all experimental treatments which are being offered fails than so be it but, for a government to lord over the decision for this child to receive the treatment is criminal. This is what government run healthcare looks like, and that is why I reject it in total. :down: