GFR7
New member
Yes, I suppose that was the crux of her point......You are probably right, but the hypocrisy here (assuming the lesbian woman isn't making stuff up) is insane.
Yes, I suppose that was the crux of her point......You are probably right, but the hypocrisy here (assuming the lesbian woman isn't making stuff up) is insane.
I'm not sure I see the problem. Should people who commit adultery be able to stay annonymous? Do adulterers really have any business talking about "family values"? Should they even be in office?
God can use the actions of villains for good (Ge 50:20).Understood, and she is pointing out the hypocrisy. But is drawing from gossip the proper way to go about outing these people? And this seems counter to right to privacy......I don't know. She seems vengeful over the same sex marriage issue.
Even Satanists have standards. Is. 65:5...Talk tough about family values and the "sanctity of marriage," and maybe your dirty laundry comes out. Seems fair to me.
I thought so, too.What this woman is doing, is playing on the fears of those who have something to hide. She's bluffing, mostly.
Bad idea.
What this woman is doing, is playing on the fears of those who have something to hide. She's bluffing, mostly.
Bad idea.
They will look for some skeleton in her closet - and they will find it.Even if this were so I still don't see the problem. Make 'em squirm.
They will look for some skeleton in her closet - and they will find it.
[M]aybe 'sad' was the wrong word for me to use there. Do you think that 'twisted' or 'sick' would be a better choice?
Even if this were so I still don't see the problem. Make 'em squirm.
I've seen it happen before. Something she forgot....we shall see..........Well she's out, so that's not an option, and considering she's made herself a target, I doubt they'll find anything.
Yep ... tit for tat. Seems she has taken some notes from her opponents.
Ya know, I've asked this a couple times now and haven't gotten an answer:
If she was threatening to expose hypocrites as closet cases, why would the Christians here have a problem with it?
I absolutely do NOT approve of her getting death threats. If this is actually occurring, it is dreadfully wrong.
I am not approving of death threats, or saying she is owed them, no!your post blames her for the death threats
Understood, and she is pointing out the hypocrisy. But is drawing from gossip the proper way to go about outing these people? And this seems counter to right to privacy......I don't know. She seems vengeful over the same sex marriage issue.
I agree!Exactly, by making her empty threat, then admitting she had no evidence of such, only gossip, she shows herself already willing to use extortion to try to force people to do what she wants - ie support her agenda.
Already shows she dishonest.
Well being that all LGBTs care about is sex, as it is there chosen, central identifying substance above all other things, it's not surprising that a lesbian would come and threaten others on it.