I have watched the news, and they say he was too young to own the rifle. Of course, like anything (on the news), it might be wrongly stated.
Kyle Rittenhouse Shooting
- Thread starter The Berean
- Start date
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
the news reporting was based on the prosecution's misapplication of a pertinent Wisconsin law that the judge ruled the day before yesterday did not apply.
Like most of the news coverage of this event, the media's version is a lie
Newsmedia: If there is no money in it and is righteous, wrongly state it.
Maybe I should make it into a poem.
If Rittenhouse didn’t have a rifle he would be dead. Did you not see the man running at Kyle with a pistol in his hand ? All three rioters that Kyle shot were criminals. In the US , even if liberals and pacifist don’t like it, folks have a right to defend themselves.
The rifle was semi- automatic not full auto.
The rifle was not illegally automatic and someone did post he had a right to carry.
The real issue is, I used to carry all the time, but I did not go into a riot area at night because I'm sensible enough to know in a place where people are acting out being violent, I might have to defend myself. This is the deliberation, the jury will consider his ability to act responsibly. If someone much older went to a riot with a gun, they would be a cooked goose!
Another prosecution mistake? Did one bullet shred an assailants arm?
The issue is being sensible and reasonable. I used to be a fancy cop of sorts. I would not have gone to a riot at night with a rifle, unless I was doing my duty as a law officer there to maintain order. Had that been the case, I would not have had to shoot anyone. Rittenhouse was not equipped to deal with a riot situation. He did not belong there.
Korean shop owners brandished long guns during the Rodney King riots and their stores were not looted, smashed, or burned. What sort of protection do you think would be best for property owners to encourage rioting animals to avoid destroying their properties?
Sadly, it has become a divisive issue in which deranged leftists think they should riot, loot, and destroy at will and good Americans totally disagree with such uncivilized animal behavior.
The kid did not go there to shoot anyone. He went there to protect private property from deranged animals looting, burning, and destroying property with the blessing of the democrat party.
How is it a good idea to not get involved when rioting barbarians are looting, burning, and destroying cities without resistance?
Nobody belonged there, especially hired thugs like the armed felon who was shot for pointing his gun in the boy's face. What was the professional rioter doing there anyway? Who paid felons like that to destroy cities? The boy defending himself was not the problem prosecutors should have been addressing. The FBI should have been tracking down those who financed the riots as enemies of the state and professional terrorists.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
An excellent question and the reason I keep bringing Hannie Schaft and Freddie Oversteegen into the conversation. Unfortunately they are not well known in America.
The pedophiles should have stayed home.
Wait.
They should have been executed.
Wait.
They should have been executed by the government.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Woulda shoulda coulda
The fact of the matter was that last year, with the complicity of the mainstream media and the owners of digital media platforms, Democratic governors and Mayors allowed their cities to burn, with the sole intention of removing President Trump from office.
And those who opposed the carnage (which met the very definition of terrorism) were branded terrorists themselves.
That's the spirit.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
The pedophiles should have been executed yes.
and so should every single person who was complicit in the terrorism that was ongoing - from governors and mayors, to the violent people in the street, to the prosecutors in The Rittenhouse case, to Nancy Pelosi and Kamala Harris.
all of them should be tried as terrorists or enablers of terrorism and executed publicly.
Should be
and so should every single person who was complicit in the terrorism that was ongoing - from governors and mayors, to the violent people in the street, to the prosecutors in The Rittenhouse case, to Nancy Pelosi and Kamala Harris.
all of them should be tried as terrorists or enablers of terrorism and executed publicly.
Should be