Yes, I stated this over a year ago. The three men who were shot attacked Rittenhouse first. They instigated the violent encounter. Rittenhouse went above and beyond to run away from his attackers. The three ADULT men chose to engage a teenage boy in violence. It's pretty stupid to attack a person carrying a rifle and who knows how to use it. There are no "heroes" here. But IMO Rittenhouse was justified in defending himself. He should be found not guilty.Rittenhouse only ever fired in self defense after several criminals assaulted him. I don't know why some people can't see that, but those people are in "denial of reality" mode on this issue.
Agreed except for the part about there being no "heroes" here. Rittenhouse acted out of altruism from beginning to end. He went to Kenosha to scrub graffiti and put out arson fires. He was armed for his own protection and defended himself when necessary. If every 17 year old was a Kyle Rittenhouse, we'd have a lot less crime in our country. Rittenhouse is a hero.Yes, I stated this over a year ago. The three men who were shot attacked Rittenhouse first. They instigated the violent encounter. Rittenhouse went above and beyond to run away from his attackers. The three ADULT men chose to engage a teenage boy in violence. It's pretty stupid to attack a person carrying a rifle and who knows how to use it. There are no "heroes" here. But IMO Rittenhouse was justified in defending himself. He should be found not guilty.
The liberal media is total garbage here. They are trying to paint this kid as a racist white nationalist which is a complete lie. This case has nothing to do with racism.
The one muppet who unquestionably attempted to murder him got away with only a shot in the arm. Kyle let him off easy. which proves that he was not the ruthless killer or vigilante that the MSM are trying to paint him out to be.That kid should be held up as a national hero and the muppets who tried to murder him executed.
This is just my personal view but killing an unarmed man is not particularly heroic. Sometimes killing is unavoidable or necessary for instance in self defense or the death penalty. But we should never take pleasure or celebrate the killing of another human being. But Rittenhouse had every right to defend himself and he did so legally as far as I can tell. I just do not like the idea in general of 17 year old kids carrying weapons. Rittenhouse was still a minor. Where were his parents? Rittenhouse seems to be mature for his age which is great. He kept his cool under pressure and duress. He attempted run away from his attackers That's a credit to him. But the vast majority of 17 year old are nothing like Rittenhouse.Agreed except for the part about there being no "heroes" here. Rittenhouse acted out of altruism from beginning to end. He went to Kenosha to scrub graffiti and put out arson fires. He was armed for his own protection and defended himself when necessary. If every 17 year old was a Kyle Rittenhouse, we'd have a lot less crime in our country. Rittenhouse is a hero.
LOL!!!!
It worked for Nick SandmannI hope he sues, successfully, every media figure and outlet that slandered him as guilty before he even stood trial.
This is just my personal view but killing an unarmed man is not particularly heroic.
Sometimes killing is unavoidable or necessary for instance in self defense
or the death penalty. But we should never take pleasure or celebrate the killing of another human being.
But Rittenhouse had every right to defend himself and he did so legally as far as I can tell.
I just do not like the idea in general of 17 year old kids carrying weapons.
Rittenhouse was still a minor. Where were his parents? Rittenhouse seems to be mature for his age which is great. He kept his cool under pressure and duress. He attempted run away from his attackers That's a credit to him. But the vast majority of 17 year old are nothing like Rittenhouse.
True, but the rioters, looters, arsonists, etc had no business being there either. Perhaps one can fault him for being to idealistic, I can't fault this kid for trying to be on the side of right.r.
He is clearly guilty of the misdemeanor gun charge though, but he had no business being there in the first place.
Law enforcement across the country was overwhelmed at that point.If he feared his safety he would have stayed home and let law enforcement do their job.
The ones who got killed were far, far dumber, but sure, let's ruin this kid's future. No, wait, let's not.Since they didn't ask him or any other boy scouts for help he was just in the way and wound up almost getting killed himself and killing other people,. That dumb kid
s Shapiro ever going to grow up, he looks like Dobie Gillis.4:38 Shapiro rips the leftist MSM coverage of the trial.
How about all those other people walking around armed? Why single out Rittenhouse when he was not there to riot?Maybe baby, but I don't know? Seems like I would not have an AR type gun and I would not take a gun to a riot, or whatever you call it, and not think it might lead to shooting someone. Maybe I'm strange, but I think walking about armed is asking for trouble.